Brecht’s Gale

References

• Arthur, Christopher J. (2004) The New Dialectic and Marx’s Capital, Leiden and Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, Christopher J. (2011) ‘Towards a systematic dialectic of capital’, https://chrisarthur.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/towards-a-systematic-dialectic-of-capital.pdf, accessed 14 April 2016
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, David (2011) ‘Toward a definition of post-Brechtian performance: The example of In the Jungle of the Cities at the Berliner Ensemble, 1971’, Modern Drama 54(3): 333–56.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, David (2013) ‘Performing dialectics in an age of uncertainty, or: Why post-Brechtian ≠ postdramatic’, in Karen Jürs-Munby, Jerome Carroll and Steve Giles (eds) Postdramatic Theatre and the Political, London: Bloomsbury Methuen, pp. 47–66.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Walter (2008) ‘The author as producer’, in Michael Jennings, Brigid Doherty and Thomas Y. Levin (eds), trans. E. F. N Jephcott, The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Boenisch, Peter (2015) Directing Scenes and Senses: The thinking of Regie, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brecht, Bertolt (2000a) ‘Radio as a communications apparatus’, in Marc Silberman (ed. and trans.) Brecht on Film & Radio, London: Bloomsbury Methuen, pp. 41–7.
   Google Scholar
• Brecht, Bertolt (2000b) ‘The Threepenny lawsuit’, in Marc Silberman (ed. and trans.) Brecht on Film & Radio, London: Bloomsbury Methuen, pp. 147–201.
   Google Scholar
• Brecht, Bertolt (2015a) ‘Notes on the opera Rise and Fall of the City of Mahogany,’ in Marc Silberman, Steve Gilles and Tom Kuhn (eds) , trans. Steve Gilles, Brecht on Theatre: The development of an aesthetic, London: Bloomsbury Methuen, pp. 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Brecht, Bertolt (2015b) ‘Notes on The Threepenny Opera‘, in Marc Silberman, Steve Gilles and Tom Kuhn (eds), trans. John Willet, Brecht on Theatre: The development of an aesthetic, London: Bloomsbury Methuen, pp. 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Clayton (1997), The Innovator’s Dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, Susannah (2015) ‘An explosive response to Bizet’, The Guardian, 26 April, http://www.theguardian.com/ stage/2015/apr/26/carmen-disruption-almeida-review, accessed 21 March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, Peter (2007) Innovation and Entrepreneurship, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Endnotes (2010) ‘Communisation and value-form theory’ , Endnotes 2: Misery and the value form, http://endnotes.org. uk/en/endnotes-communisation-and-value-form-theory, accessed 5 January 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, Jan (2006) ‘Innovation: A guide to the literature’, in Jan Fagerberg, David Mowry and Richard Nelson (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, Ian (2015) ‘As good a time as any’, There Ought to Be Clowns, 9 May, http://oughttobeclowns.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/review-as-good-time-as-any-print-room. html, accessed 12 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Garton, Tom (2015) ‘Carmen Disruption’, The Arbuturian, 29 April, http://wwwcarmen-disruption, accessed 12 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoit (2015) Innovation Contested: The idea of innovation over the centuries, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, Ryan Anthony (2016) ‘Short reviews’, PAJ 112: 123–6.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, Michael (2012) An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital, trans. Alexander Locascio, New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarcho, Julia (2014) ‘Mouthing off: The negativity of monologue in Mac Wellman’s A Murder of Crows‘, Modern Drama 57(3): 293–314.
   Google Scholar
• Jürs-Munby, Karen, Jerome Carroll and Steve Giles, eds (2013) Postdramatic Theatre and the Political, London: Bloomsbury Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, Douglas (2010), ‘Brecht’s Marxist aesthetic: The Korsch connection’, in Betty Weber and Hubert Heinen (eds) Bertolt Brecht: Political theory and literary practice, Athens: The University of Georgia Press, pp. 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Korsch, Karl (1977) Revolutionary Theory, ed. Douglas Kellner, Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Hans-Thies (2006) Postdramatic Theatre, trans. Karen Jürs-Munby, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, Edward (2015) ‘Carmen Disruption at the Almeida Theatre’, 20 April, http://www.onceaweektheatre. com/?p=1582, accessed 15 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl (1993) Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy, trans. Martin Nicolaus, New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl (2015) Capital: A critique of political economy, Volume 1, ed. Friedrich Engels, trans. Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling, Marxists Internet Archive, http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf, accessed 5 January 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels (2008) The Communist Manifesto, trans. Samuel Moore, London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal (2005) On the Political, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Roswitha (2006) ‘Learning for a new society: The Lehrstück‘ in Peter Thomson and Glendyr Sacks (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Brecht, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, Michael (2013) Novelty: The history of the new, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques (1999) Disagreement: Politics and philosophy, trans. Julie Rose, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridout, Nicholas (2006) Stage Fright, Animals and Other Theatrical Problems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph (2008) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, Mike (2008) Avant-Garde Performance and the Limits of Criticism: Approaching the Living Theatre, Happenings/Fluxus, and the Black Arts Movements, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanbury, Kate (2015) ‘Carmen Disruption’, Official London Theatre, 20 April, http://www.officiallondontheatre.co.uk/ news/first-nights/article/item278857/carmen-disruption/, accessed 12 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, Simon (2015a) ‘How Bizet’s Carmen became a male prostitute’, The Guardian, 13 April, http://www.theguardian.com/music/2015/apr/13/carmen-as-male-prostitute-simon-stephens-carmen-disruption, accessed 21 May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, Simon (2015b) Carmen Disruption, London: Bloomsbury Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin, Liz (2011) Acts and Apparitions: Discourses on the real in performance practice and theory, 1990–2010, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Matt (2015) ‘Opera and drama deconstructed’, The New York Times, p. 10, 23 April.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, Brandon (2013) ‘Towards a paradoxically parallaxical postdramatic politics?’ in Karen Jürs-Munby, Jerome Carroll and Steve Giles (eds) Postdramatic Theatre and the Political, London: Bloomsbury Methuen, pp. 31–46.
   Google Scholar