The Responsibility to Protect: A Normative Shift from Words to Action?

References

• Acharya, Amitav. ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.’ International Organization 38, no. 2 (2004): 239–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnoli, Carla. ‘Humanitarian Intervention as a Perfect Duty: A Kantian Argument.’ In Nomos XLVII: Humanitarian Intervention, ed. Terry Nardin and Melissa Williams, 117–40. New York: New York University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, Alex. ‘Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm.’ Ethics & International Affairs 25, no. 3 (2011): 263–9. doi: 10.1017/S0892679411000219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, Alex. Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnée, Jutta, and Stephen J. Toope. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, Michael. Question of Intervention: John Stuart Mill and the Responsibility to Protect. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, Matthew. Law, Ethics, and the War on Terror. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Gareth. Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, WB. ‘Essentially Contestable Concepts.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 56 (1955–1956): 167–198. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, Aidan. The Responsibility to Protect: Rhetoric, Reality and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• ICISS. The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identities in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, Alan. ‘Suicidal Rebellions and the Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention.’ In Gambling on Humanitarian Intervention, ed. T. Crawford and A. Kuperman, 1–25. London: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, David. Decision-Making in the Security Council: The Case of Haiti 1990–1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, Jeremy. ‘Sovereignty as Irresponsibility? A Realist Critique of the Responsibility to Protect.’ Review of International Studies 39, no. 1 (2013): 113–135. doi: 10.1017/S0260210512000113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, Robert, and Aidan Hehir. ‘Intervention in the Emerging Multipoloar System: Why R2P Will Miss the Unipolar Moment.’ Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 20, no. 3 (2012): 387–406. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2012.714237
   Google Scholar
• Pattison, J. Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Gerry. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Kok-Chor. ‘The Duty to Protect.’ In Nomos XLVII: Humanitarian Intervention, ed. Terry Nardin and Melissa Williams, 84–116. New York: New York University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, Ramesh. The People vs. the State: Reflections on UN Authority, US Power and the Responsibility to Protect. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. New York: United Nations, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility. New York: United Nations, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century. New York: United Nations, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, Thomas G. ‘The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention? The Responsibility to Protect in a Unipolar Era.’ Security Dialogue 35, no. 2 (2004): 135–53. doi: 10.1177/0967010604044973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar