Political guidance or autonomy in peacebuilding? EU police reform in Afghanistan and Kosovo

Bibliography

• Allen, Susan Hannah, and Amy T. Yuen. ‘The Politics of Peacekeeping: UN Security Council Oversight across Peacekeeping Missions.’ International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 3 (2014): 621–32. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucoin, Peter. ‘Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums.’ Governance 3, no. 2 (1990): 115–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.1990.tb00111.x
   Google Scholar
• Auswärtiges Amt. Sachstand Kosovo – Serbien/Dialogprozess/Nordkosovo. Berlin: Auswärtiges Amt, Jan. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Michael W. ‘Introduction: Organizational Change, Management Reform and EU Policy-Making.’ Journal of European Public Policy 15, no. 5 (2008): 627–47. doi: 10.1080/13501760802133138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet, Richard, Morgan Greene, and Jonathan Friedman. Building the Police Service in a Security Vacuum: International Efforts in Kosovo, 1999–2011. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Innovations for Successful Societies, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Breakey, Hugh, and Sidney Dekker. ‘Weak Links in the Chain of Authority: The Challenges of Intervention Decisions to Protect Civilians.’ International Peacekeeping 21, no. 3 (2014): 307–23. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2014.928572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budäus, Dietrich, and Gernod Grüning. ‘New Public Management – Entwicklung und Grundlagen einer “Revolution” des öffentlichen Sektors.’ Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation (zfo) 67, no. 1 (1998): 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Coombes, David L. ‘The Place of Public Management in the Modern European State.’ In Innovations in Public Management: Perspectives from East and West Europe, ed. Tony Verheijen and David L. Coombes, 8–38. Cheltenham: Elgar, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. Assessment Report on Compliance with International Standards in the Anti-Corruption (AC) Area. Ed. Fleming Denker, Drino Galicic, Jean-Christophe Geiser and Edmond Dunga. Brussels: Project against Economic Crime in Kosovo (PECK) by the Council of Europe, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Robert W. ‘The Executive Head: An Essay on Leadership in International Organization.’ International Organization 23, no. 2 (1969): 205–30. doi: 10.1017/S002081830003157X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa, Diana Felix, and John Karlsrud. ‘“Bending the Rules”: The Space between HQ Policy and Local Action in UN Civilian Peacekeeping.’ Journal of International Peacekeeping 17, no. 3–4 (2013): 293–312. doi: 10.1163/18754112-1704007
   Google Scholar
• De Coning, Cedric. ‘Planning for Success.’ In Managing Complexity: Political and Managerial Challenges in United Nations Peace Operations, ed. Caty Clement and Adam C. Smith, 24–7. New York: International Peace Institute, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• De Wet, Erika. ‘The Governance of Kosovo: Security Council Resolution 1244 and the Establishment and Functioning of EULEX.’ American Journal of International Law 103, no. 1 (2009): 83–96. doi: 10.2307/20456723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Hylke. ‘Efficiency versus Sovereignty: Delegation to the UN Secretariat in Peacekeeping.’ International Peacekeeping 19, no. 5 (2012): 581–96. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2012.721993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Hylke. ‘The Military Operation of the EU in Chad and the Central African Republic: Good Policy, Bad Politics.’ International Peacekeeping 17, no. 3 (2010): 395–407. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2010.500150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Hylke. ‘The Planning and Implementation of the Rule of Law Mission of the European Union in Kosovo.’ Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 5, no. 2 (2011): 193–210. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2011.566481
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Hylke. Policy-Making in EU Security and Defense: An Institutional Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, Klaus. ‘Global Democracy and the Democratic Minimum: Why a Procedural Account Alone Is Insufficient.’ European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 4 (2014): 1124–47. doi: 10.1177/1354066113509116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, Sebastian, and Melanie Schreiner. ‘What Makes Inter-Organizational Collaboration in UN Peacebuilding Work? Results from an Organizational Analysis of the UN Community in Liberia.’ Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6, no. 3 (2012): 325–350. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2012.655628
   Google Scholar
• Eckhard, Steffen. Zwischen Ertüchtigung und Wertewandel. Internationale Erfahrungen bei der Unterstützung von Sicherheitssektorreform. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung; Global Public Policy Institute, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council. Council Document. Approval of the Crisis Management Concept Concerning the Future Crisis Management Operation in Afghanistan. Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council. Council Document. Approval of the Crisis Management Concept Concerning the Future Crisis Management Operation in Kosovo. Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council. Council Document on Suggestions for Procedures for Coherent, Comprehensive EU Crisis Management. Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council. Council Joint Action on Establishment of the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGANISTAN). Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council. Council Joint Action on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO). Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• EULEX. EULEX Programme Report 2009. Pristina: European Union Rule of Law Mission (EULEX) in Kosovo, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Auditors. European Union Assistance to Kosovo Related to the Rule of Law. Special Report No. 18/2012. Brussels: European Court of Auditors, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Geri, Laurance R. ‘New Public Management and the Reform of International Organizations.’ International Review of Administrative Sciences 67, no. 3 (2001): 445–60. doi: 10.1177/0020852301673004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, John. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Greicevci, Labinot. ‘EU Actorness in International Affairs: The Case of EULEX Mission in Kosovo.’ Perspectives on European Politics and Society 12, no. 3 (2011): 283–303. doi: 10.1080/15705854.2011.596307
   Google Scholar
• Grevi, Giovanni, Damien Helly, and Daniel Keohane, eds. European Security and Defense Policy: The First Ten Years (1999–2009). Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, Alexandru. ‘International Organizations and Their Bureaucratic Oversight.’ In Routledge Handbook of International Organization, ed. Bob Reinalda, 176–88. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. EU's Biggest Foreign Mission in Turmoil Over Corruption Row (Online Edition (Article by Julian Borger)). London: The Guardian, 5 November 2014. http://gu.com/p/433nt/sbl (accessed 22 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Guéhenno, Jean-Marie. Robust Peacekeeping: Building Political Consensus and Strengthening Command and Control. New York: Center on International Cooperation, New York University, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gutner, Tamar, and Alexander Thompson. ‘The Politics of IO Performance: A Framework.’ Review of International Organizations 5, no. 3 (2010): 227–48. doi: 10.1007/s11558-010-9096-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, M. ‘Bridging the Capability–Expectations Gap: A Case Study of the CFSP Joint Action on South Africa.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 33, no. 4 (1995): 555–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1995.tb00550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael, M. Ramesh, and Anthony Perl. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles & Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• ICG. ‘Kosovo: The Challenge of Transition.’ In Europe Report No. 170 (17 February 2006). Belgrade/Brussels: International Crisis Group, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• IPI (International Peace Institute). The Management Handbook for UN Field Missions. New York: Author, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Bruce D. ‘The Challenges of Strategic Coordination.’ In Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements, ed. Stephen J. Stedman, Donald S. Rothchild and Elizabeth M. Cousens, 89–116. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Junk, Julian. ‘Function Follows Form: The Organizational Design of Peace Operations.’ Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6, no. 3 (2012): 299–324. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2012.655627
   Google Scholar
• Karlsrud, John. ‘Special Representatives of the Secretary-General as Norm Arbitrators? Understanding Bottom–Up Authority in UN Peacekeeping.’ Global Governance 19, no. 4 (2013): 525–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Daniel. ‘Lessons from EU Peace Operations.’ Journal of International Peacekeeping 15, no. 1–2 (2011): 200–17. doi: 10.1163/187541110X540544
   Google Scholar
• Knill, Christoph, and Tim Balint. ‘Explaining Variation in Organizational Change: The Reform of Human Resource Management in the European Commission and the OECD.’ Journal of European Public Policy 15, no. 5 (2008): 669–90. doi: 10.1080/13501760802133153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal. ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions.’ International Organization 55, no. 4 (2011): 761–99. doi: 10.1162/002081801317193592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. ‘Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.’ American Political Science Review 65 (1971): 682–93. doi: 10.2307/1955513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson, Michael. ‘Performance under Ambiguity: International Organization Performance in UN Peacekeeping.’ Review of International Organizations 5, no. 3 (2010): 249–84. doi: 10.1007/s11558-010-9090-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, M. ‘Conflict Management Capabilities of Peace-Brokering International Organizations, 1945–2010: A New Dataset.’ Conflict Management and Peace Science (2015). doi:10.1177/0738894215572757.
   Google Scholar
• Malesic, Marjan. ‘Civilian Crisis Management in the EU: Strcutural and Functional Aspects.’ Journal of International Peacekeeping 15, no. 1–2 (2011): 152–77. doi: 10.1163/187541110X540526
   Google Scholar
• Mattelaer, Alexander. ‘The CSDP Mission Planning Process of the European Union: Innovations and Shortfalls.’ European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 14, no. 1 (2010): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mayntz, Renate. ‘Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena.’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34, no. 2 (2004): 237–59. doi: 10.1177/0048393103262552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meharg, Sarah Jane. Measuring What Matters in Peace Operations and Crisis Management. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Natsios, Andrew. The Clash of the Counter-Bureaucracy and Development. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, William A. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• NTM-A (NATO Training Mission Afghanistan). Year in Review: November 2009 to November 2010. Kabul: Author, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• OSCE. OSCE Handbook. Vienna: Press and Public Information Section, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania, and Luc Reychler. Aid for Peace: A Guide to Planning and Evaluation for Conflict Zones. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Edward C. Policies without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, Charles. Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View: Behavioral Science in Industry. London: Tavistock Publications, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Christopher. Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Christopher, and G. Bouckaert. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Christopher, and Colin Talbot. Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. Vol. 1. London: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Putzel, James, and Jonathan Di John. Meeting the Challenges of Crisis States. London School of Economics: Crisis States Research Centre Report, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz Wilhelm. Regieren in Europa: effektiv und demokratisch? Frankfurt/Main: Campus-Verl, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sedra, Mark. ‘An Uncertain Future for Afghanistan’s Security Sector.’ Stability: International Journal of Security and Development 3, no. 1 (2014): 35. doi:http://doi.org/10.5334/sta.ei. doi: 10.5334/sta.ei
   Google Scholar
• Seibel, Wolfgang. ‘Peace Operations and Modern Protectorates: The Logic of Successful Failure.’ In The New Protectorates: International Tutelage and the Making of Liberal States, ed. James Mayall and Ricardo Soares de Oliveira, 163–82. London: Hurst & Company, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1947.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Randall W. Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas-Jensen, Colin, and Tara R. Gingerich. No Will, No Way: US-Funded Security Sector Reform in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Washington, DC: Oxfam America, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• UN DPKO. Lessons Learned in Kosovo: Transition from UNMIK Police. New York: United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Office of the Rule of Law and Security Institutions, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom. ‘The EU’s Afghan Police Mission: Report with Evidence.’ In Report of Session. London: House of Lords: European Union Committee, 2011. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201011/ldselect/ldeucom/87/87.pdf (accessed 22 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• UN Secretary-General. ‘Letter Dated 26 March 2007 from the Secretary-General Addressed to the President of the Security Council (“Ahtisaari Plan”).’ New York: United Nations Security Council, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• UN Security Council. Proceedings of 4469th Meeting. New York: United Nations Security Council, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• US Government. ‘Subject: “Afghan Police Training: Shift to Focused District Development”.’ Kabul: US Embassy, 15 Nov. 2007. In US Code Cable published as part of the ‘Wikileaks Affair’: http://www.cablegatesearch.net/ (accessed 1 Nov. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• US Government. ‘Subject “KOSOVO/EULEX: At Full Operational Capability, but Not without Problems”.’ Pristina: US Embassy, 8 April 2009. In US code cable published as part of the ‘Wikileaks Affair’: http://www.cablegatesearch.net/ (accessed 1 Nov. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• US Government. ‘Subject “Kosovo: EULEX at the Six Months Point”.’ In US code cable published as part of the ‘Wikileaks Affair’: http://www.cablegatesearch.net/ (accessed 1 Nov. 2014). Pristina: US Embassy, 4 July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• US Government. ‘Subject: “OSCE Interest in Afghanistan”.’ Kabul: US Embassy, 12 July 2007. In US code cable published as part of the ‘Wikileaks Affair’: http://wikileaks.org/cable/2007/07/07KABUL2250.html (accessed 1 Nov. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• US Government. ‘Subject: “Our Take on Afghanistan Objectives at the Riga Summit”.’ Kabul: US Embassy, 9 Nov. 2006. In US code cable published as part of the ‘Wikileaks Affair’: http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/11/06KABUL5414.html (accessed 1 Nov. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Winckler, Joel Gwyn. ‘Exceeding Limitations of the United Nations Peacekeeping Bureaucracy: Strategies of Officials to Influence Peacekeeping Activities within the United Nations Mission in Liberia and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations.’ International Peacekeeping 22, no. 1 (2015): 43–64. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2014.992576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• ZIF (Zentrum für internationale Friedenseinsätze). Friedenseinsätze 2014/15. Berlin: Author, 2015.
   Google Scholar