Bandwagon for Status: Changing Patterns in the Nordic States Status-seeking Strategies?

References

• Archer, Clive. “Small States and the European Security and Defence Policy.” In Small States in Europe Challenges and Opportunities, ed. Robert Steinmetz and Anders Wivel, 47–64. Padstow: Ashgate, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Clive, Alyson J.K. Bailes, and Anders Wivel. Small States and International Security: Europe and Beyond. New York: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ask, Alf O. “Stoltenberg skal møte Obama i Det hvite hus.” Aftenposten, October 1, 2011. http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/Stoltenberg-skal-mote-Obama-i-Det-hvite-hus-6632847.html (accessed June 22, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Bailes, Alyson J.K., Bradley A. Thayer, and Baldur Thorhallsson. “Alliance Theory and Alliance ‘Shelter’: The Complexities of Small State Alliance Behaviour.” Third World Thematics 1, no. 1 (2016): 9–26. doi: 10.1080/23802014.2016.1189806
   Google Scholar
• Beach, Derek, and Rasmus Brun Pedersen. Causal Case Studies Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bildt, Carl. Personal Blog. http://carlbildt.wordpress.com/ (accessed October 8, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Branner, Hans. I krig igen Danmark og de nye Krige 1990–2011. København: Columbus, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, Christopher S. “Brand Nordicity: Models, Identity and the Decline of Exceptionalism.” Cooperation and Conflict 42, no. 1 (2007): 27–51. doi: 10.1177/0010836707073475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, Luke, and Daniel Kochis. The Role of Sweden and Finland in NATO’s Defense of the Baltic States. Issue Brief #4554 on International Conflicts, April 28, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Dafoe, Allan, Jonathan Renshon, and Paul Huth. “Reputation and Status as Motives for War.” Annual Review of Political Science 17 (2014): 371–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-071112-213421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. En verden i forandring. Regeringens bud på nye prioriteter i Danmarks Udenrigspolitik. København: Regeringen, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Parliament. Forhandlinger – Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om et dansk militært bidrag til en NATO-indsats på det vestlige Balkan. Speech 20, 1998/99a (accessed October 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Danish Parliament. Forhandlinger – Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om et udvidet dansk militært bidrag til en NATO-indsats på det vestlige Balkan, 1998/99b (accessed October 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Danish Parliament. Forhandlinger – Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om dansk militær deltagelse i den internationale indsats mod terrornetværk i Afghanistan, 2001/02a.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Parliament. Forhandlinger – Første behandling af beslutningsforslag nr. B 45: Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om dansk militær deltagelse i en international sikkerhedsstyrke, 2001/02b.
   Google Scholar
• De Cavalho, Benjamin. “Brasil: Endelig en stormakt eller for evig fremtidens land?” Internasjonal Politikk 69, no. 2 (2011): 293–300.
   Google Scholar
• Doeser, Frederik. “Sweden’s Libya Decision: A Case of Humanitarian Intervention.” International Politics 51 (2014a): 196–213. doi: 10.1057/ip.2014.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doeser, Frederik “Sweden’s Participation in Operation Unified Protector: Obligations and Interests.” International Peacekeeping 21, no. 5 (2014b): 642–57. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2014.963325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doeser, Frederik. “Finland, Sweden and Operation Unified Protector: The Impact of Strategic Culture.” Comparative Strategy 35, no. 4 (2016): 284–97. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2016.1222842
   Google Scholar
• Eelland, Johan. “Friends, But Not Allies: Finland, Sweden, and NATO in the Baltic Sea.” Baltic Bulletin, June 13, 2016. http://www.fpri.org/article/2016/06/friends-not-allies-finland-sweden-nato-baltic-sea/.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Ministry of Defense. “Finlands säkerhets- och Sörsvarspolitik 2012. Statsrådets redogörelse.” Statsrådets kanslis publikationsserie 6/2012, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Ministry of Defense. “Puolustusministeri Niinistö: Irakin koulutusoperaatioon osallistuminen kehittää puolustusvoimien suorituskykyjä.” March 9, 2016a.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Ministry of Defense. Section III, 2016b. http://www.defmin.fi/index.phtml?l=en&s=186.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Toumas. “The Rise of Nordic Defence Cooperation: A Return to Regionalism?” International Affairs 89, no. 5 (2013): 1161–1181. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsvarsdepartementet. Beredskap for fred – Om Norges framtidige militære FN-engasjement og FNs rolle som konfliktløser. Stortingsmelding nr. 14. Oslo: Forsvarsdepartementet, 1992–1993a.
   Google Scholar
• Godal, Bjørn Tore, Gunhild Hoogensen Gjørv, Mats Berdal, Torgeir Hagen, Gro Nystuen, Kristian Berg Harpviken, Sten Rynning, Astri Suhrke, Rolf Tamnes, and Torunn Wimpelmann. En god alliert – Norge i Afghanistan 2001–2014, Norges offentlige utredninger, 8. Oslo: DSS, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gotkowska, Justyna, and Piotr Szymański. Pro-American Non-alignment. Sweden and Finland Develop Closer Military Co-operation with the United States. OSW Commentary, April 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund, Carl. “Credible Defense Forces Cannot Be Built Alone. Yle, September 30, 2014. https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/defense_minister_haglund_credible_defense_forces_cannot_be_built_alone/7501118.
   Google Scholar
• Halonen, Tarja. “Halonen Lukewarm on Sending Hornet Jets to Libya.” YLE, March 23, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, Anders, and Jens Ringsmose. “What Did Denmark Gain? Iraq, Afghanistan and the Relationship with Washington.” In Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2012, ed. Nanna Hvidt and Hans Mouritzen. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ingebritsen, Christine. “Norm Entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s Role in World Politics.” Cooperation and Conflict 37 (2002): 11–23. doi: 10.1177/0010836702037001689
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Peter Viggo. “The Danish Libya Campaign: Out in Front in Pursuit of Pride, Praise and Position.” In Political Rationale and International Consequences of the War in Libya, ed. Dag Henriksen and Ann Karin Larssen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016a.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Peter Viggo. “Denmark and UN Peacekeeping: Glorious Past, Dim Future.” International Peacekeeping no. 5 (2016b): 741–61. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2016.1227933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Peter Viggo, Jens Ringsmose, and Håkon Lunde Saxi. “Bandwagoning for Prestige: Denmark, Norway and the War on Terror.” Paper presented at the CEEISA-ISA Joint International Conference, June 22–25, Ljubljana, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kaim, Markus. “Reforming NATO’s Partnerships.” SWP Research Paper, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsrud, John, and Kari M. Osland. “Between Self-interest and Solidarity: Norway’s Return to UN Peacekeeping?” International Peacekeeping 23, no. 5 (2016): 762–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koops, Joakim A., and Giulia Tercovich. “A European return to United Nations Peacekeeping? Opportunities, Challenges and Ways Ahead.” International Peacekeeping 23, no. 5 (2016): 597–609. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2016.1236430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuisma, Mikko. “Social Democratic Internationalism and the Welfare State After the Golden Age.” Cooperation and Conflict 42 (2007): 9–26. doi: 10.1177/0010836707073474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, Peter. “The Good State in World Politics: In Praise of Classical Internationalism.” Review of International Studies 31, no. 3 (2005): 427–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, Peter. “Janus-faced Solidarity Danish Internationalism Reconsidered.” Cooperation and Conflict 42 (2007): 101–26. doi: 10.1177/0010836707073478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markey, Daniel. “Prestige and the Origins of War: Returning to Realism’s Roots.” Security Studies 8, no. 4 (1999): 126–72. doi: 10.1080/09636419908429388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Rebecca R. “Lisbon and the Evolution of NATO’s New Partnership Policy.” Perceptions 17, no. 1 (2012): 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, Hans. “Denmark’s Super Atlanticism.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies 5 (2007): 155–69. doi: 10.1080/14794019908656861
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, Hans. “Small States and Finlandisation in the Age of Trump.” Survival 59, no. 2 (2017): 67–84. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2017.1302191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, Hans, and Anders Wivel, eds. The Geopolitics of Euro-Atlantic Integration. London: Routledge, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, Hans, and Anders Wivel. Explaining Foreign Policy: International Diplomacy and the Russo-Georgian War. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, Lars R. Operation Bøllebank: Soldater i kamp. København: Høst & Søns Forlag, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. “Relations with Finland.” 2017. http://www.nato.int/cps/cn/natohq/topics_49594.htm (accessed June 16, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver B. (2014) “Status is Cultural: Durkheimian Poles and Weberian Russians Seek Great Power Status.” In Status in World Politics, ed. Thazha Varkey Paul, Deborah Larson, and William Wohlforth. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver B., and Benjamin de Cavalho. “Introduction: Small States and Status.” In Small State Status Seeking. Norway’s Quest for International Standing, ed. Iver B. Neumann and Benjamin de Cavalho, 1–21. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Claes, and Kristina Zetterlund. “Sweden and the UN: A Rekindled Partnership for Peacekeeping?” International Peacekeeping 23, no. 5 (2016): 762–83. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2016.1235097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Afghanistan Commission. En god alliert – Norge i Afghanistan 2001–2014. Oslo: Departementenes sikkerhets- og serviceorganisasjon, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Defence. Tilpasning av forsvaret til deltagelse i internasjonale operasjoner, Report to the Storting, No. 38, 1998–99. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1998–1999.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Interesser, Ansvar Og Muligheter: Hovedlinjer i Norsk Utenrikspolitikk, Report to the Storting, No. 15. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2008–2009.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Nikolaj. “Den tro allierede: Danmark og 11. september.” In 11 September Internationale konsekvenser og perspektiver, ed. Mehdi Mozaffari, 118–133. Aarhus: Systime, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Press, Darryl G. Calculating Credibility. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Jonathan. Reputation and International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Jonathan. “The Illusion of International Prestige.” International Security 41, no. 4, (2017): 133–68. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Rasmus Brun and Y. Reykers. “Small States Bandwagon for Status? A Comparative Study of Denmark and Belgium.” Paper presented at The XVIII Nordic Political Science Congress, University of Denmark (Odense), August 8–11, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Politiken. “Danmark klar til militær aktion.” Politiken, December 6, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Anders Fogh. “60 året for 29. august 1943.” Speech at Naval Base Holmen. Copenhagen, August 29, 2003a.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Anders Fogh. “Visioner om Danmarks aktive Europapolitik.” Speech at the University of Copenhagen, September 23, 2003b.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Anders Fogh. “Hvad kan det nytte?” Berlingske Tidende, March 26, 2003c.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Anders Fogh. “Danmark må gøre op med småstatsmentaliteten.” Ugebrevet Mandag Morgen, September 11, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, Erich, and Heinz Gärtner. Small States and Alliances. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Renshon, Jonathan. “Status Deficits and War.” International Organization 70 (2016): 513–50. doi: 10.1017/S0020818316000163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, Jens. NATO Burden Sharing Redux: Continuity and Change after the Cold War. Contemporary Security Policy 31, no. 2 (2010): 319–338. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2010.491391
   Google Scholar
• Saxi, Håkon L. Norwegian and Danish Defence Policy: A Comparative Study of the Post-Cold War Era. Defence and Security Studies No. 1. Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Saxi, Håkon L. “So Similar, Yet So Different: Explaining Divergence in Nordic Defence Policies.” In Common or Divided Security? German and Norwegian Perspectives on Euro-Atlantic Security, ed. Robin Allers, Carlo Masala, and Rolf Tamnes, 257–58. Bern: Peter Lang, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, Randall. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Reviosionist State Back In.” International Security 19 (1994): 72–107. doi: 10.2307/2539149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smed, Ulrik Trolle, and Anders Wivel. “Vulnerability Without Capabilities? Small State Strategy and the International Counter-piracy Agenda.” European Security 26, no. 1 (2017): 79–98. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2016.1265941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoltenberg, Jens. Min Historie. Oslo: Gyldendal, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Stubb, Alexander. “ Finnish Participation in Libyan Operations Unlikely.” YLE, March 22, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. Regeringens skrivelse 2007/08:51. Nationell strategi för svenskt deltagande i internationell freds- och säkerhetsfrämjande verksamhet. Stockholm, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. Sweden in NATO Led Operations – Completed. 2017a. http://www.swedenabroad.com/en-GB/Embassies/Nato/Sweden--PFP/Sweden-in-NATO-led-operations--sys/Completed-missions---ISAF-and-OUP-sys/ (accessed June 16, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. Sweden in NATO Led Operations – Ongoing. 2017b. http://www.swedenabroad.com/en-GB/Embassies/Nato/Sweden--PFP/Sweden-in-NATO-led-operations--sys/Ongoing-operations-RSM-and-KFOR-sys/ (accessed June 16, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament 2010/11. Parliament Records of Sweden, 2010/11: 78, March 29, 2011, statement 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, Kevin, and Paul Fritz. “Jumping on the Bandwagon: An Interest-based Explanation for Great Power Alliances.” Journal of Politics 66 (2004): 428–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00158.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utenriksdepartementet. Irak. Norske militære bidrag til stabiliseringsstyrken. Folkerettslige aspekter. Oslo: Utenriksdepartementet, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Verdens Gang. “Norge sier nei til NATO.” October 18, 2006. https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/afghanistan/norge-sier-nei-til-nato/a/134567/ (assessed October 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M. “Alliance Formation and Balance of World Power.” International Security 9 (1985): 3–43. doi: 10.2307/2538540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M. Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M. “Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: The Case of Southwest Asia.” International Organization 42 (1988): 275–316. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300032823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House. Fact Sheet: The United States and Norway – NATO Allies and Global Partners. Washington, DC: The White House, 2011. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/10/20/fact-sheet-united-states-and-norway-nato-allies-and-global-partners (accessed June 22, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Wohlforth, William C. “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War.” World Politics 61 (2009): 28–57. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Steve. “Prestige in World Politics: History, Theory, Expression.” International Politics 50 (2013): 387–411. doi: 10.1057/ip.2013.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar