Agents of Change? Gender Advisors in NATO Militaries

Bibliography

• Ackerley, Brooke, Maria Stern, and Jacqui True. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Azarbaijani-Moghaddam, Sippi. Seeking Out Their Afghan Sisters: Female Engagement Teams in Afghanistan. Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) Working Paper, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Caglar, G., E. Prügl, and S. Zwingel. Feminist Strategies in International Governance. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Society Advisory Panel on Women, Peace and Security. Report and Recommendations of the Second Annual Meeting. Brussels: NATO, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia. From Where We Stand: War, Women’s Activism and Feminist Analysis. London: Zed Books, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia. Snagged on the Contradiction: NATO, UNSC Resolution 1325, and Feminist Responses. Originally presented at the Annual Meeting of No to War – No to NATO Dublin. 15–17 April 2011. 2012. http://www.cynthiacockburn.org/BlogNATO1325.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia, and Cynthia Enloe. “Militarism, Patriarchy and Peace Movements.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 14, no. 4 (2012): 550–7. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2012.726098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia, and Meliha Hubic. “Gender and the Peacekeeping Military: A View from Bosnian Women’s Organisations.” In The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping: Bosnia and the Netherlands, ed. Zarkov Dubravka and Cynthia Cockburn, 103–21. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, Carol. “Mainstreaming Gender in UN Security Policy: A Path to Political Transformation?” In Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Shirin Rai and Gerogina Waylen, 185–206. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, Robert. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, Claire. “Anti-militarist Feminist Approaches to Researching Gender and the Military.” In Palgrave Handbook of Gender and the Military, ed. Rachel Woodward and Claire Duncanson, 39–58. London: Palgrave, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, Claire, and Rachel Woodward. “Regendering the Military: Theorizing Women’s Military Participation.” Security Dialogue 47, no. 1 (2015): 3–21. doi: 10.1177/0967010615614137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnell, Robert, Petter Hojem, and Hannes Berts. Implementing a Gender Perspective in Military Organisations and Operations: The Swedish Armed Forces Model. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, Zillah. Sexual Decoys: Gender, Race and War in Imperial Democracy. London: Zed Books, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• EU Operation Headquarters. Final Report on Gender Work inside EUFOR RD Congo. Potsdam, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Eyben, Rosalind, and Laura Turquet. Feminists in Development Organizations: Change from the Margins. Rugby: Practical Action, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Heinecken, Lindy. “Are Women ‘Really’ Making a Unique Contribution to Peacekeeping?” Journal of International Peacekeeping 19 (2015): 227–48. doi: 10.1163/18754112-01904002
   Google Scholar
• Heinecken, Lindy. “Transitions and Transformation in Gender Relations in the South African Military: From Support in Warfare to Valued Peacekeepers,” In The Palgrave International Handbook of Gender and the Military, ed. Rachel Woodward and Claire Duncanson, 355–68. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, Matthew. “The ‘Genderman’: (Re)negotiating Militarized Masculinities When ‘Doing Gender’ at NATO.” Critical Military Studies 4, no. 1 (2018): 72–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, Kathleen. Women’s Participation in UN Peacekeeping: Agents of Change or Stranded Symbols? NOREF Report. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Mary. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest Inside the Church and Military. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kesteloo, Anne. Gendered Discourses and Practices on Gender in Military Operations: The Interpretation and Implementation of a Gender Perspective in the ISAF Operation by the Accounts of Dutch Military Gender Advisers. Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Khalili, Laleh. “Gendered Practices of Counterinsurgency.” Review of International Studies 37 (2011): 1471–91. doi: 10.1017/S026021051000121X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Anthony. “Women in Combat.” RUSI Journal 158 (2013): 4–11. doi: 10.1080/03071847.2013.774634
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, Annica. Gender, Sex and the Postnational Defense: Militarism and Peacekeeping. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lackenbauer, Helené, and Richard Langlais. Review of the Practical Implications of UNSCR 1325 for the Conduct of NATO-Led Operations and Missions. Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI), 2013. https://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2013_10/20131021_131023-UNSCR1325-review-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Longworth, Sally, and Ola Engdahl. Getting Perspective: Incorporating a Gender Perspective in Military Operations and the Impact on International Humanitarian Law. Folkrättscentrum, 2014. https://www.redcross.se/contentassets/ec766f1ea07f44999ed064efc1b703b1/longworth-and-engdahl-getting-perspective.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mesok, Elizabeth, “Affective Technologies of War US Female Counterinsurgents and the Performance of Gendered Labor.” Radical History Review 123 (2015): 60–86. doi: 10.1215/01636545-3088156
   Google Scholar
• Moskos, Charles, John Allen Williams, and David R Segal, eds. The Post-Modern Military: Armed Forces After the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. Bi-Strategic Directive 40-1: Integrating UNSCR 1325 and Gender Perspectives in the NATO Command Structure Including Measures for Protection During Armed Conflict, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. Bi-Strategic Directive 40-1 Revision 1: Integrating UNSCR 1325 and Gender Perspective into the NATO Command Structure, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. Comprehensive Report on the NATO/EAPC Policy on the Implementation of UNSCR 1325 on Women, Peace and Security and Related Resolutions, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• NATO ACO ACT. Bi-Strategic Directive 40-1: Integrating UNSCR 1325 and Gender Perspective into the NATO Command Structure. (Public Version), 2017.
   Google Scholar
• NATO/EAPC. Implementing UNSCR 1325 on Women, Peace and Security. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• NATO IMS Office of the Gender Advisor. Summary of the National Reports of NATO member and Partner Nations to the NATO Committee on Gender Perspectives 2015. Brussels: NATO, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• NATO Public Diplomacy Division. The Secretary General’s Annual Report 2016. Brussels: NATO, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Centre for Gender in Military Operations. Whose Security? Practical Examples of Gender Perspectives in Military Operations. Kungsangen: Nordic Centre for Gender in Military Operations, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, Louise, and Johan Tejpar. The Swedish PRT in Mazar-e Sharif, in: Operational Effectiveness and UN Resolution 1325 – Practices and Lessons from Afghanistan. Stockholm: FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, 2009, 98–114.
   Google Scholar
• Ormhaug, Christin, Patrick Meier, and Helga Hernes. “Armed Conflict Deaths Disaggregated by Gender.” PRIO Paper 23 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Otto, Diane. “Women, Peace and Security: A Critical Analysis of the Security Council’s Vision,” LSE Women, Peace and Security Working Paper Series. LSE, London, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, V. Spike, and Anne Runyan. Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Perseus, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, Nicola. “Reconceptualizing Gender, Reinscribing Racial-Sexual Boundaries in International Security: The Case of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on ‘Women, Peace and Security.’” International Studies Quarterly 57, no. 4 (2013): 772–83. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott, Jody. “NATO Gender Mainstreaming: A New Approach to War Amongst the People?” RUSI Journal 158 (2013): 56–62. doi: 10.1080/03071847.2013.847722
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, Audrey. Involvement of Parliaments in Advancing the ‘Women, Peace and Security’ Agenda in NATO Member Countries. Geneva: DCAF & NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rehn, Elizabeth, and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts’ Assessment of the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women’s Role in Peacebuilding. UNIFEM, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Defence Research Agency. Operational Effectiveness and UN Resolution 1325 – Practices and Lessons from Afghanistan. Stockholm: FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• UN Women. Preventing Conflict, Transforming Justice, Securing the Peace: A Global Study on the Implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, Laurie. Gender Camouflage: Women and the US Military. New York: NYU Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, Sandra. Men, Militarism, and UN Peacekeeping: A Gendered Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• WILPF. Gender, Economic, Social and Ecological Justice for Sustainable Development: A Feminist Declaration for Post 2015. 2014. http://www.wilpfinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Feminists-Post-2015-Declaration.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• WILPF. Vision and Mission, 2018. https://wilpf.org/wilpf/vision-and-mission.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Hannah, “Ending Sexual Violence and the War System – Or Militarizing Feminism?” International Feminist Journal of Politics 17, no. 3 (2015): 503–7. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2015.1055923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Katherine. “NATO’S Adoption of UNSCR 1325 on Women, Peace and Security: Making the Agenda a Reality.” International Political Science Review 37, no. 3 (2016): 350–61. doi: 10.1177/0192512116638763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar