Legitimacy of Using Force as a Fundamental Ingredient for Military Motivation in Robust Peacekeeping Operations

Bibliography

• Aguilar, Sérgio. “Uma Cultura Brasileira de Missões de Paz” [A Brazilian Culture of Peace Mission]. In Diplomacia Brasileira Para a Paz, eds. Clóvis Brigagão and Fernanda Fernandes, 215–241. Brasília: FUNAG, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Aoi, Chiyuki, Cedric De Coning, and John Karlsrud. “Introduction: Addressing the Emerging Gap between Concepts, Doctrine, and Practice in UN Peacekeeping Operations.” In UN Peacekeeping Doctrine in a New Era, edited by Cedric De Coning, Chiyuki Aoi, and John Karlsrud, 1–30. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, Robert, and Donn Byrne. Social Psychology. 8th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, David. The Legitimation of Power. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Berdal, Mats. “What are the Limits to the Use of Force in UN Peacekeeping?” In United Nations Peace Operations in a Changing Global Order, eds. Cedric De Coning and Mateja Peter, 113–132. Cham: Springer Nature, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Biehl, Heiko, and Jörg Keller. “Hohe Identifikation und Nüchterner Blick: Die Sicht der Bundeswehrsoldaten auf ihre Einsätze” [High Identification and a Down-to-Earth Perspective: The Bundeswehr Soldiers’ View of their Engagements]. In Auslandeinsätze der Bundeswehr: Sozialwissenschafliche Analysen, Diagnosen und Perspektiven, eds. Sabine Jaberg, Heiko Biehl, Günther Mohrmann, and Maren Tomforde, 121–141. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Capie, David. “Indonesia as an Emerging Peacekeeping Power: Norm Revisionist or Pragmatic Provider?” Contemporary Southeast Asia 38, no. 1 (2016): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claude, Inis. “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations” International Organization 20, no. 3 (1966): 367–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coicaud, Jean-Marc. “International Organizations as a Profession: Professional Mobility and Power Distribution,” 1–49. WIDER Research Paper 2006/109, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Katharina. International Organizations and Peace Enforcement: The Politics of International Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: SAGE Publications, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, Michael, and Nicolas Sambanis. Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, Jane, Janet Dukerich, and Celia Harquail. “Organizational Images and Member Identification.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39, no. 2 (1994): 239–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziedzic, Michael, and Robert Perito. “Haiti: Confronting the Gangs of Port-au-Prince.” United States Institute of Peace 208 (2008): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Kari. “The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation and Change.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, no. 2 (1990): 202–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Graham, and Jeffrey Newnham. Dictionary of International Relations. London: Penguin Books, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, Susan, and Shelley Taylor. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. London: SAGE Publications, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fröhling, Hans-G, and Wolf Rausch. “Entscheiden und Verantworten: Konfliktsituationen in UN-Einsätze” [Deciding and Taking Responsibility: Conflict Situations in UN Operations], 1–41. Working paper 1/96, Zentrum Innere Führung, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, Reuven. “Unit Morale: From a Theoretical Puzzle to an Empirical Illustration—An Israeli Example 1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 16, no. 6 (1986): 549–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulart, Fernando. Ação sob Fogo: Fundamentos da Motivação para o Combate [Action under Fire: Fundamentals of Combat Motivation]. Rio de Janeiro: BIBLIEX, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Goulart, Fernando. “Blue Helmets, Armed Groups, and Peace at Stake: Does Combat Motivation Matter for Robust Peacekeeping to Succeed?” International Peacekeeping 28, no. 1 (2021): 30–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des Demokratischen Rechtsstaates [Factuality and Validity: Contributions to the Discourse Theory of Law and the Democratic Constitutional State]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Heinecken, Lindy, and Rialize Ferreira. “‘Fighting for Peace’: The Psychological Effect of Peace Operations on South African Peacekeepers (Part III).” African Security Review 21, no. 2 (2012): 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Henkin, Louis. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Lise, Gino Vlavonou, Nina Steinitz, and Yvan Ilunga. “Assessing the Effectiveness of the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic / MINUSCA.” EPON Report, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Jenne, Nicole. “¿Aumenta la Participación en Operaciones de Paz la Capacidad de las Fuerzas Armadas en Interactuar con Actores Civiles? Una Evaluación del Aprendizaje en el Caso de las Fuerzas Armadas Chilenas” [Does Participation in Peace Operations Increase Armed Forces’ Capacity to Interact with Civilian Actors? An Assessment of Learning in the Case of the Chilean Armed Forces]. Estudos Internacionais 8, no. 2 (2020): 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsrud, John. “The UN at War: Examining the Consequences of Peace-Enforcement Mandates for the UN Peacekeeping Operations in the CAR, the DRC and Mali.” Third World Quarterly 36, no. 1 (2015): 40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellet, Anthony. Combat Motivation: The Behaviour of Soldiers in Battle. Heidelberg: Springer-Science & Business Media, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, Friedrich. “On Legitimacy.” International Relations 20, no. 3 (2006): 302–308.
   Google Scholar
• Laveglia, Nicolás. “E-Mail Interview by the Author with Captain Nicolás Alberto Curbelo Laveglia, from the Army of Uruguay,” 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Manstead, Antony. “Social Psychology of Emotion.” In Advanced Social Psychology: The State of the Science, eds. Roy Baumeister and Eli Finkel, 101–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, Joseph. “Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research.” Harvard Educational Review 62, no. 3 (1992): 279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça, Marcos. “Brazil in Haiti, a Success Story: An Analysis of the Brazilian Mission in Haiti.” In Brazil’s Participation in MINUSTAH (2004–2017): Perceptions, Lessons and Practices for Future Missions, eds. Eduarda Hamman and Carlos Teixeira, 58–65. Rio de Janeiro: Igarapé Institute, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Oetting, Dirk W. Motivation und Gefechtswert: Von Verhalten des Soldaten im Kriege [Motivation and Combat Power: On the Behaviour of Soldiers in War]. Frankfurt: Report Verlag, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Paddon Rhoads, Emily. “Putting Human Rights up Front: Implications for Impartiality and the Politics of UN Peacekeeping.” International Peacekeeping 26, no. 3 (2019): 281–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, Fabienne. Political Legitimacy. Stanford: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Popovski, Vesselin, and Nicholas Turner. “Legitimacy as Complement and Corrective to Legality.” In Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs, eds. Richard Falk, Mark Juergensmeyer, and Vesselin Popovski, 439–450. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sabrow, Sophia. “Local Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Peace Operations by the UN, Regional Organizations and Individual States – A Case Study of the Mali Conflict.” International Peacekeeping 24, no. 1 (2017): 159–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64, no. 4 (1970): 1033–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalit, Ben. The Psychology of Conflict and Combat. New York: Praeger, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, Boas. “Meaning, Self and Motivation in Organizations.” Organization Studies 12, no. 3 (1991): 405–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, André Luiz. “E-Mail Interview by the Author with Major (Ret.) André Luiz Pereira Da Silva, from the Brazilian Army,” 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Mark C. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” The Academy of Management Review 20, no. 3 (1995): 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Department of Peacekeeping Operations. United Nations Infantry Battalion Manual. New York: DPKO, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Department of Peacekeeping Operations and Department of Field Support. United Nations Peacekeeping Operations: Principles and Guidelines. New York: DPKO/DFS, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Department of Peacekeeping Operations and Department of Field Support. “Use of Force by Military Components in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations,” 2017.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Department of Political Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, and Department of Field Support. “Policy on Accountability for Conduct and Discipline in Field Missions,” 2015.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. General Assembly. “Revised Model Memorandum of Understanding between the UN and Troop Contributing Countries, incorporating the Annex ‘We are the UN Peacekeeping Personnel’,” 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Von Billerbeck, Sarah. “UN Peace Operations and Conflicting Legitimacies.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11, no. 3 (2017): 286–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Whalan, Jeni. How Peace Operations Work: Power, Legitimacy, and Effectiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Whalan, Jeni. “The Local Legitimacy of Peacekeepers.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11, no. 3 (2017): 306–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiharta, Sharon. “The Legitimacy of Peace Operations.” In SIPRI Yearbook 2009: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security 15, 95–116. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, Thomas, and Reuven Gal, eds. Legitimacy and Commitment in the Military. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Yasuaki, Onuma. A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law, vol. 342. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.
   Google Scholar