Anti-abortion activism in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: ‘nationalizing’ the strategies

References

• Banchoff, Thomas. 2011. Embryo Politics: Ethics and Policy in Atlantic Democracies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burack, Cynthia, and Angelia Wilson. 2009. “Constructing Christian Right Enemies and Allies: US, UK and Eastern Europe.” In Remoralizing Britain? Political, Ethical and Theological Perspectives on New Labour, edited by Peter Manley Scott, Christopher R. Baker, Christopher Graham, and Elaine L. Graham, 136–155. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, Doris, and Didi Herman. 2003. Globalizing Family Values: The Christian Right in International Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byk, Christian. 2007. “Bioethics, Religion and the European Institutions.” Derecho y religion 2: 91–102. Accessed 7 October 2020. https://derechoyreligion.com/producto/dr2-bioethics-religions-and-the-european-institutions-byk/
   Google Scholar
• Calfano, Brian Robert. 2006. “On Denominations and Districts: Examining the Influence of ‘Pro-life’ Denominational Communities on State Representatives.” Journal of Church and State 48 (1): 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSO (Czech Statistical Office). 2012. Obyvatelstvo podle víry v krajích. Sčítání lidu, domů a bytů 2011 ČR (Religion of the Population by Population and Housing Census). Accessed 25 June 2018. https://tinyurl.com/SLD9100PU
   Google Scholar
• Doan, Alesha E. 2007. Opposition and Intimidation: The Abortion Wars and Strategies of Political Harassment. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudová, Radka. 2010. “The Framing of Abortion in the Czech Republic: How the Continuity of Discourse Prevents Institutional Change.” Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 46 (6): 945–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudová, Radka. 2012. Interrupce v České Republice: zápas o ženská těla (Interruption in the Czech Republic: The Fight for the Women’s Bodies). Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, Veřejná výzkumná instituce (Public Research Institution).
   Google Scholar
• Ďurinová, Petra. 2015. “Slovakia.” In Gender as Symbolic Glue: The Position and Role of Conservative and Far Right Parties in the Anti-Gender Mobilization in Europe, edited by Eszter Kováts and Maari Põim, 104–125. Brussels: Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, Myra Marx, William Anthony Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gajdoš, Adam, and Ivana Rapošová. 2018. “Juggling Grammars, Translating Common-Place: Justifying an Anti-liberal Referendum to a Liberal Public.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5 (1–2): 165–193.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, Susan, and Gail Kligman. 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Githens, Marianne. 1996. “Reproductive Rights and the Struggle with Change in Eastern Europe.” In Abortion Politics: Public Policy in Cross-cultural Perspective, edited by Dorothy McBride Stetson and Marianne Githens, 55–71. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamplová, Dana, and Zdeněk R. Nešpor. 2009. “Invisible Religion in a ‘Non-believing’ Country: The Case of the Czech Republic.” Social Compass 56 (4): 581–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, Jacqueline, and Anna Matuchniak-Krasuska. 1995. “Abortion in Poland: A Vicious Circle or a Good Use of Rhetoric.” Women’s Studies International Forum 18 (1): 27–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kobová, Ľubica. 2011. “Limity biopolitiky: Dva príklady politizovania sexuálnych a reprodukčných práv žien (The Limits of Biopolitics: Two Examples of the Politization of the Sexual and Reproductive Rights of Women).” In Politiky a političky (Male and Female Politicians), edited by Jana Cviková, 51–93. Bratislava: Aspekt.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlbacher, Florian. 2006. “The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case Study Research.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7 (1): Art. 21. Accessed 7 October 2020. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/75./0
   Google Scholar
• Kuhar, Roman. 2015. “Playing with Science: Sexual Citizenship and the Roman Catholic Church Counter-Narratives in Slovenia and Croatia.” Women’s Studies International Forum 49 (March–April): 84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhar, Roman, and David Paternotte. 2017. Anti-Gender Campaigns: Mobilizing against Equality. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Karsten. 2016. Religious NGOs in International Relations: The Construction of ‘the Religious’ and ‘the Secular’. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, Philipp. 2000. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (2): Art. 20. Accessed 7 October 2020. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385
   Google Scholar
• McBride Stetson, Dorothy. 2003. Abortion Politics, Women’s Movements, and the Democratic State: A Comparative Study of State Feminisms. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishtal, Joanna. 2015. The Politics of Morality: The Church, the State, and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondo, Emilie. 2014. “The Role of Values in EU Bioethics Politics: An American Culture Wars Scenario? The Case of Abortion.” Politique Européenne 45 (3): 122–150.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, W. Ziad. 2008. The Making of Pro-Life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nešpor, Zdeněk R. 2010. “L’Amnésie de la remémoration dans la société tchèque.” Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions 149 (January–March): 109–128.
   Google Scholar
• Patternote, David, and Roman Kuhar. 2017. “The Anti-Gender Movement in Comparative Perspective.” In Anti-Gender Campaigns: Mobilizing against Equality, edited by Roman Kuhar and David Paternotte, 253–276. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Petö, Andrea. 2015. “Epilogue: ‘Anti-Gender’ Mobilisation Discourse of Conservative and Far Right Parties as a Challenge for Progressive Politics.” In Gender as Symbolic Glue: The Position and Role of Conservative and Far Right Parties in the Anti-Gender Mobilization in Europe, edited by Eszter Kováts and Maari Põim, 126–138. Brussels: Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2018. “Eastern and Western Europeans Differ on Importance of Religion: Views of Minorities, and Key Social Issues.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Accessed 9 November 2018. http://www.pewforum.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2018/10/Eastern-Western-Europe-FOR-WEB-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, Kenneth. 2003. Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, Matthew C. 2013. “’Pro-Life’ in the Czech Republic: What Kind of Europeanization is Present?” Středoevropské politické studie 15 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Saurette, Paul, and Kelly Gordon. 2015. Anti-Abortion Movement: The Rise of ‘Pro-Women’ Rhetoric in Canada and the United States. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, Reva B. 2012. “Dignity and Sexuality: Claims on Dignity in Transnational Debates over Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (2): 355–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smrek, Michal. 2015. “The Failed Slovak Referendum on ‘Family’: Voters’ Apathy and Minority Rights in Central Europe.” Baltic Worlds. Accessed 25 June 2018. http://balticworlds.com/the-failed-slovak-referendum-on-%E2%80%9Cfamily%E2%80%9D/
   Google Scholar
• Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, Michael, and Josselin Tricou. 2017. “Resisting ‘Gender Theory’ in France: A Fulcrum for Religious Action in a Secular Society.” In Anti-Gender Campaigns: Mobilizing against Equality, edited by Roman Kuhar and David Paternotte, 79–98. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Stan, Lavinia, and Lucian Turcescu. 2011. Church, State, and Democracy in Expanding Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Štulhofer, Aleksandar, and Theo Sandfort. 2005. Sexuality and Gender in Postcommunist Eastern Europe and Russia. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tamney, Joseph B., Stephen D. Johnson, and Ronald Burton. 1992. “The Abortion Controversy: Conflicting Beliefs and Values in the American Society.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 31 (1): 32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tížik, Miroslav. 2006. K sociológii novej religiozity: podoby zmeny náboženského života v 20. storočí (The Sociology of the New Religiosity: Faces of the Change of Religious Life in the Twentieth Century). Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.
   Google Scholar
• Tížik, Miroslav. 2011. Náboženstvo vo verejnom živote na Slovensku: zápasy o ideový charakter štátu a spoločnosti (Religion in the Public Life in Slovakia: Struggles for the Ideological Character of State and Society). Bratislava: Sociologický ústav SAV.
   Google Scholar
• Váně, Jan, and Martin Štípková. 2013. “The National Religious Environment and the Orthodoxy of Christian Beliefs: A Comparison of Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 49 (3): 375–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vido, Roman, David Václavík, and Antonín Paleček. 2016. “Czech Republic: The Promised Land for Atheists?” Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion 7: 201–232.
   Google Scholar
• Wolchik, Sharon L. 2000. “Reproductive Policies in the Czech and Slovak Republics.” In Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism, edited by Susan Gal and Gail Kligman, 58–92. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar