213
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Quality and the scholarship of teaching: learning from subject review

&
Pages 231-241 | Published online: 13 Oct 2010

References

  • Andresen , L . 2000 . ‘A usable, trans‐disciplinary conception of scholarship’ . Higher Education Research and Development , 19 (2) : pp. 137–53
  • Business Education Support Team(BEST) 2002 ‘Best funds available for an Analysis of the QAA Subject Review’ http://www.business.ltsn.ac.uk/news/QAA%20Review.htm accessed 15/10/02
  • Biggs J 1999 Teaching for Quality Learning at University (Buckingham, Society for Research in Higher Education/Open University Press)
  • Boyer E 1990 Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate (Princeton, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching)
  • Brown , R . 2003 . ‘What future for higher education?’ . Higher Education Review , 35 (3) : pp. 3–22
  • Dearing R 1997 The National Committee of Inquiry in Higher Education: Report of the National Committee (London, NCIHE)
  • Fry H Ketteridge S Marshall S 1999 A Handbook for Teaching & Learning in Higher Education: enhancing academic practice (London, Kogan‐Page)
  • Harvey , L . 1995 . ‘Editorial’ . Quality in Higher Education , 1 (1) : pp. 5–12
  • Harvey , L and Green , D . 1993 . ‘Defining Quality’ . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 18 (1) : pp. 9–34
  • Hutchings P Schulman L 1999 ‘The scholarship of teaching: new elaborations, new developments’ Change September/October pp. 11–15
  • Kreber , C . 2002 . ‘Controversy and consensus on the scholarship of teaching’ . Studies in Higher Education , 27 (2) : pp. 151–67
  • Kreber , C and Cranton , P . 2000 . ‘Exploring the scholarship of teaching’ . Journal of Higher Education , 71 : pp. 476–96
  • Macfarlane B Ottewill R (Eds.) 2001 Effective Learning and Teaching in Business and Management (London, Kogan Page)
  • McGill I Beaty L 1995 Action Learning: a guide for professional, management and educational development (London, Kogan Page)
  • Marriott , N and Marriott , P . 2003 . ‘Student learning style preferences and undergraduate academic performance at two UK universities’ . International Journal of Management Education , 3 (1) : pp. 4–13
  • Marton , F and Saljo , R . 1976 . ‘On qualitative differences in learning’ . British Journal of Educational Psychology , 46 : pp. 4–11
  • Moon J 1999 Reflection in Learning & Professional Development: theory & practice (London, Kogan Page)
  • Morehead , J and Shedd , P . 1996 . ‘Student interviews: a vital role in the scholarship of teaching’ . Innovative Higher Education , 20 : pp. 261–69
  • Nicholls G 2001 Professional Development in Higher Education. New Dimensions and Directions (London, Kogan Page)
  • Proctor K 1993 Tutors' professional knowledge of supervision and the implications for supervision practice in Calderhead, J. & Gates, P. (Eds.) Conceptualizing Reflection in Teacher Development (London, Falmer Press)
  • Prosser M Trigwell K 1999 Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience of higher education (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press)
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2000 Subject Review Handbook (September 2000 – December, 2001) (Gloucester, QAA)
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001a Subject Overview Report: business and management Ref: QO5
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001b Subject Review Report, University of Southampton, Business and Management Ref: Q17
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001c Subject Review Report, Oxford Brookes University, Business and Management Ref: Q38
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001d Subject Review Report, Doncaster College, Business and Management Ref: Q61
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001e Subject Review Report, University of the West of England in Bristol, Business and Management Ref: Q120
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001f Subject Review Report, Bridgwater College, Business and Management Ref: Q130
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001g Subject Review Report, University of Reading, Business and Management Ref: Q188
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001h Subject Review Report, University of Greenwich, Business and Management Ref: Q220
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001i Subject Review Report, Leeds Metropolitan University, Business and Management Ref: Q248
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001j Subject Review Report, Crawley College, Business and Management Ref: Q340
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001k Subject Review Report, University of Central England in Birmingham, Business and Management Ref: Q409
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001l Subject Review Report, University of Wolverhampton, Business and Management Ref: Q422
  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001m Subject Review Report, Liverpool Hope, Business and Management Ref: Q514
  • Smith D 1999 The changing idea of a university in Smith, D. & Langslow, A.K. (Eds.) The Idea of a University (London, Jessica Kingsley)
  • Times Higher Education Supplement (THES) 2001 ‘LSE leads revolt against QAA’, 23 March
  • Trigwell K 2003 ‘Research on learning and teaching within an institution. A critical look at scholarship of teaching & learning’ Centre for Learning and Teaching – Sociology, Anthropology and Politics Conference April, Birmingham

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.