Standards for quality? A critical appraisal of the Berlin Principles for international rankings of universities

References

• Bowden, R., 2000, ‘Fantasy higher education: university and college league tables’, Quality in Higher Education, 6(1), pp. 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. & Liu, N.C., 2008, ‘Examining major rankings according to the Berlin principles’, Higher Education in Europe, 33(2), pp. 201–08.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D. & Soo, M., 2005, ‘Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: a cross-national analysis of university rankings’, Higher Education, 49, pp. 495–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, D. & Meyer, J.W., 2007, ‘University expansion and the knowledge society’, Theory and Society, 36, pp. 287–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., 2008, ‘Rankings of higher education institutions: a critical review’, Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), pp. 187–207.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., 2007, ‘The impact of league tables and ranking systems on higher education decision making’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2), pp. 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., 2008, ‘Learning to live with league tables and ranking: the experience of institutional leaders’, Higher Education Policy, 21, pp. 193–215.
   Google Scholar
• Hedmo, T., 2004, Rule-making in the Transnational Space: The development of European accreditation in management education (Uppsala, Uppsala University).
   Google Scholar
• Hedmo, T., Sahlin-Andersson, K. & Wedlin, L., 2006, ‘The emergence of a European regulatory field of management education’ in Djelic, M.-L. and Sahlin-Andersson, K., (Eds.) Transnational Governance (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• International Rankings Expert Group (IREG), 2004, ‘International Expert Group Created to Improve Higher Education Rankings’. Available at http://www.ihep.org/press-room/news_release-detail.cfm?id=95 (accessed 24 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• International Rankings Expert Group (IREG), 2006, ‘Berlin Principles on Rankings of Higher Education Institutions’. Available at http://www.ireg-observatory.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=41&Itemid=48 (accessed 24 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• International Rankings Expert Group (IREG), 2009, ‘IREG-4 programme’. Available at http://www.ireg-observatory.org/pdf/IREG-4brochure.pdf (accessed 24 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• International Rankings Expert Group (IREG), 2010, ‘The Academic rankings: from popularity to reliability and relevance’. Available at http://www.ireg-observatory.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=54&Itemid=80 (accessed 24 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• International Rankings Expert Group (IREG), 2011, ‘IREG ranking audit: purpose, criteria and procedure’. Available at http://www.ireg-observatory.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=15&Itemid=137 (accessed 24 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. & Stensaker, B., (Eds.),2009, University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education (Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei, Sense).
   Google Scholar
• King, R., 2009, Governing Universities Globally. Organisations, regulation and rankings (Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Locke, W., Verbik, L., Richardson, J. & King, R., 2008, Counting What is Measured or Measuring What Counts? League tables and their impact on higher education institutions in England (Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol).
   Google Scholar
• Merisotis, J. & Sadlak, J., 2005, ‘Higher education rankings: evolution, acceptance, and dialogue’, Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), pp. 97–101.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, A., 2008, ‘The complex interplay between classification and ranking of colleges and universities: should the Berlin principles apply equally to classification’, Higher Education in Europe, 33(2), pp. 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., 1996, ‘Dilemmas of accountability’, in Hirst, P. & Kihlnani, S. (Eds.) Reinventing Democracy, (Oxford, Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 1997, The Audit Society: Rituals of verification (Oxford Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rauhvargers, A., 2011, ‘Global university rankings and their impact’, The European University Association. Available at http://www.eua.be/pubs/Global_University_Rankings_and_Their_Impact.pdf (accessed 12 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Sadlak, J., 2010, ‘Opening remarks’. Available at http://www.ireg-observatory.org/prezentacje/2010/Sadlak_IREG-5_Berlin.pdf (accessed 12 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Stolz, I., Hendel, D. & Horn, A., 2010, ‘Ranking of rankings: Benchmarking twenty-five higher education ranking systems in Europe’, Higher Education, 60(5), pp. 507–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, S., & Westerheijden, D., (Eds.), 2004, Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area (Dordrecht, Kluwer).
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B. & Harvey, L., 2011, Accountability in Higher Education: Global perspectives on trust and power (NY, Abingdon UK, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization – European Centre for Higher Education (UNESCO-Cepes) Cepes, 2002, ‘From the Editors’, Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), pp. 359–60.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vught, F. & Westerheijden, D., 2010, ‘Multidimensional ranking: a new transparency tool for higher education and research’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wedlin, L., 2006, Ranking Business Schools (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar