272
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Analysing instrument mixes in quality assurance: the Czech and Slovak Accreditation Commissions in the era of mass higher education

References

  • Blackmur, D., 2010, ‘Does the emperor have the right (or any) clothes? The public regulation of higher education qualities over the last two decades’, Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 67–69.
  • Czech Accreditation Commission (CAC), 2003, Výroční zpráva Akreditační komise za rok 2003 [Report on activities of the Accreditation Commission for 2003] (Akreditační komise, Praha).
  • Czech Accreditation Commission (CAC), 2004, Statute of the Accreditation Commission (Accreditation Commission, Prague).
  • Czech Accreditation Commission (CAC), 2009, Self-evaluation report of the Accreditation Commission of the Czech Republic (Accreditation Commission, Prague).
  • Czech Accreditation Commission (CAC), 2010, Zpráva o vnitřním hodnocení Akreditační komise [Self-evaluation report of the Accreditation Commission for 2010] (Akreditační komise, Praha).
  • Dill, D.D., 2000a, ‘Designing academic audit: lessons learned in Europe and Asia’, Quality in Higher Education, 6(3), pp. 187–207.
  • Dill, D.D., 2000b, ‘Capacity building as an instrument of institutional reform: improving the quality of higher education through academic audits in the UK, New Zealand, Sweden and Hong Kong’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and practice, 2(2), pp. 211–234.
  • Dill, D.D. & Beerkens, M. (Eds.), 2010, Public Policy for Academic Quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments (Dordrecht, Springer).
  • Eliadis, P., Hill, M. & Howlett, M. (Eds.), 2005, Designing Government: From instruments to governance (Toronto, McGill-Queen’s University Press).
  • European Association of Quality Assurance Agencies (ENQA), 2005, Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (Helsinki, ENQA).
  • European Association of Quality Assurance Agencies (ENQA), 2012, Guidelines for External Reviews of Quality Assurance Agencies in the European Higher Education Area (Brussels, ENQA).
  • File, J., Weko, T., Hauptman, A., Kristensen, B. & Herlitschka, S., 2006, Country Note: The Czech Republic (Paris, OECD).
  • Harman, G., 1998, ‘Quality assurance mechanisms and their use as policy instruments: major international approaches and the Australian experience since 1993’, European Journal of Education, 33(3), pp. 331–348.
  • Harman, G., 2005, ‘Political instruments employed by governments to enhance university research and knowledge transfer capacity’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(2), pp. 75–89.
  • Harvey, L., 2004, ‘The power of accreditation: views of academics’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(2), pp. 207–23.
  • Harvey, L. & Newton, J., 2007, ‘Transforming quality evaluation: moving on’, in Westerheijden, D.F., Stensaker, B. & Rosa, M.J. (Eds.) Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (Dordrecht, Springer).
  • Harvey, L. & Williams, J., 2010, ‘Fifteen years of Quality in Higher Education’, Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 3–36.
  • Hill, M.J. & Hupe, P.L., 2010, Implementing Public Policy: Governance in theory and practice, 2nd edn. (London, Sage).
  • Hodulík, M., Rozsnyai, C., Mink, G., Tippner, A., Bednář, J., Cejpek, V., Marek, J. & Skuhrová, Š., 2010, External Review of the Accreditation Commission of the Czech Republic on Compliance with Membership Criteria of the ENQA. Available at http://www.enqa.eu/files/Final%20Report_External%20review%20of%20ACCR.pdf (accessed 12 February 2012).
  • Hood, C., 1986, The Tools of Government (Chatham, Chatham Publishers).
  • Hood, C., 2007, ‘Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: reflections on the tools of government after two decades’, Governance, 20(1), pp. 127–44.
  • Howlett, M., 2000, ‘Managing the ‘hollow state’: procedural policy instruments and modern governance’, Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), pp. 412–31.
  • Howlett, M., 2004, ‘Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: instrument mixes, implementation styles and second generation theories of policy instrument choice’, Policy and Society, 23(2), pp. 1–17.
  • Howlett, M., 2011, Designing Public Policies: Principles and instruments (London, Routledge).
  • Howlett, M., Ramesch, M. & Perl, A., 2009, Studying Public Policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems, 3rd edition. (Toronto, Oxford University Press).
  • Howlett, M. & Rayner, J., 2007, ‘Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’’, Policy and Society, 26(4), pp. 1–18.
  • Howlett, M. & Rayner, J., 2008, ‘Third generation policy diffusion studies and the analysis of policy mixes: two steps forward and one step back?’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 10(4), pp. 385–402.
  • Hupe, P.L. & Hill, M.J., 2007, ‘Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability’, Public Administration, 85(2), pp. 279–99.
  • Jeliazkova, M. & Westerheijden, D.F., 2002, ‘Systemic adaptations to a changing environment: towards a next generation of quality assurance models’, Higher Education, 44(3–4), pp. 433–48.
  • Jensen, H.T., Krajl, A., McQuillan, D. & Reichert, S., 2008, The Slovak Higher Education System and Its Research Capacity: An EUA sectoral report (EUA, Brussels).
  • Jurkovič, J., 2009, ‘State of implementation of the European standards and guidelines in the Slovak Republic in 2004–2008’, in Kohoutek, J. (Ed.) Implementation of Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education of Central and East-European Countries-Agenda Ahead (UNESCO-CEPES, Bucharest).
  • Kurzweil, J., Mikulec, J. & Vinš, V., 1995, ‘‘Akreditace pedagogických fakult’ [Accreditation of faculties of education]’, Alma Mater, 5, pp. 256–263.
  • Massy, W.F., 2005, ‘Academic audit for accountability and improvement’, in Burke, J.C. (Ed.) Achieving Accountability in Higher Education: Balancing public, academic and market demands (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
  • Massy, W.F., 2010, ‘Education quality audit as applied in Hong Kong’, in Dill, D.D. & Beerkens, M. (Eds.) Public Policy for Academic Quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments (Dordrecht, Springer).
  • May, P., 2003, ‘Policy design and implementation’, in Peters, G.B. & Pierre, J. (Eds.) Handbook of Public Administration (London, Sage).
  • Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic (MINEDU), 2007, Kritériá pro vyjadrovaní sa o zaradení vysokej školy [Criteria for categorization of higher education institutions] (Bratislava, Ministerstvo školstva).
  • Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic (MINEDU), 2010a, Dlhodobý zámer vo vzdělávacej, výskumnej, vývojovej, umeleckej a dalšej tvorivej činnosti pre oblast vysokých škôl do roku 2014 [Long-term plan of educational and research, developmental, artistic or other creative activities in the area of higher education till 2014] (Bratislava, Ministerstvo školstva).
  • Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic (MINEDU), 2010, Výročna správa o stave vysokého školstva za rok 2010 [Annual report on higher education for 2010] (Bratislava, Ministerstvo školstva).
  • Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic (MINEDU), 2011, Výročna správa o stave vysokého školstva za rok 2011 [Annual report on higher education for 2011] (Bratislava, Ministerstvo školstva).
  • Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS), 2005, Dlouhodobý záměr vzdělávací a vědecké, výzkumné a vývojové, umělecké a další tvůrčí činnosti pro oblast vysokých škol na období 2006–2010 [Long-term plan of educational and scientific, research, developmental, artistic or other creative activities in the area of higher education for 2006–2010] (Praha, Ministertsvo školství).
  • Peters, B.G. & Van Nispen, K.M. (Eds.), 1998, Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the tools of public administration (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar).
  • Pratasavitskaya, H. & Stensaker, B., 2010, ‘Quality management in higher education: towards a better understanding of an emerging field’, Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 37–50.
  • Prøitz, T.S., Stensaker, B. & Harvey, L., 2004, ‘Accreditation, standards and diversity: an analysis of EQUIS accreditation reports’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), pp. 735–750.
  • Reichert, S., 2009, Institutional Diversity in European Higher Education: Tensions and challenges for policy makers and institutional leaders (Brussels, EUA).
  • Rozsnyai, C., 2001, ‘Changing focus: internal quality audit as an element in external quality evaluation’, Tertiary Education and Management, 7(4), pp. 341–44.
  • Rozsnyai, C., 2003, ‘Quality assurance before and after ‘Bologna’ in the Central and Eastern region of the European Higher Education Area with the focus on Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland’, European Journal of Education, 38(3), pp. 271–84.
  • Ryan, L., 1994, ‘Quality assurance in higher education: a review of issues in Central and Eastern Europe’, in Brennan, J. (Ed.) EC/Phare Pilot Project on Regional Cooperation in Reforming Higher Education (Paris, OECD).
  • Ryan, L., 1993, ‘Prolegomena to accreditation in Central and Eastern Europe’, Higher Education in Europe, 18(3), pp. 81–90.
  • Saarinen, T., 2010, ‘What I talk about when I talk about quality’, Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 55–57.
  • Salamon, L.E. (Ed.), 2002, The Tools of Government: A guide to the new governance (New York, Oxford University Press).
  • Schneider, A. & Ingram, H., 1990, ‘Behavioral assumptions of policy tools’, Journal of Politics, 52(2), pp. 510–529.
  • Schneider, A. & Ingram, H., 1993, ‘Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy’, American Political Science Review, 87(2), pp. 334–347.
  • Schwarz, S. & Westerheijden, D.F. (Eds.), 2004, Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area (Dordrecht, Kluwer).
  • Scott, P., 2002, ‘Reflections on the reform of higher education in Central and Eastern Europe’, Higher Education in Europe, 27(1–2), pp. 137–52.
  • Scott, P., 2007, ‘Higher education in Central and Eastern Europe’, in Forest, J.J. & Altbach, P.G. (Eds.) International Handbook of Higher Education. Part One: Global themes and contemporary challenges, 2nd edition (Dordrecht, Springer).
  • Šebková, H., 2003, ‘Hodnocení kvality a některé aspekty mezinárodního vývoje’ [Quality evaluation and some aspects of international development], Aula, 11(special issue), pp. 68–77.
  • Šebková, H., 2004, ‘Czech quality assurance: the tasks and responsibilities of accreditation and evaluation’, in Schwarz, S. & Westerheijden, D.F. (Eds.) Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers).
  • Šebková, H. (Ed.), 2006, Tertiary Education in the Czech Republic. Country background report for OECD thematic review of tertiary education (Prague, MIB Production).
  • Šebková, H., 2009, ‘The European standards and guidelines in quality assurance mechanisms in the Czech Republic’, in Kohoutek, J. (Ed.) Implementation of Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education of Central and East-European Countries: Agenda Ahead (Bucharest, UNESCO-CEPES).
  • Slavík, V. & Plavčan, P., 1999, ‘Rozvoj vysokého školstva v Slovenskej republike v uplynulom desaťročí’, [Development of higher education in the Slovak Republic in the last decade] Pedagogická revue, 51(5), 439–447.
  • Slovak Accreditation Commission (SAC), 2001, Správa o činnosti Akreditačnej komisie za období 1999–2001 [Report on activities of the Accreditation Commission for 1999–2001] (Bratislava, Akreditačná komisia).
  • Slovak Accreditation Commission (SAC), 2005, Správa o činnosti Akreditačnej komisie za období 2002–2005 [Report on activities of the Accreditation Commission for 2002–2005] (Bratislava, Akreditačná komisia).
  • Slovak Accreditation Commission (SAC), 2007, Správa o činnosti Akreditačnej komisie za období 2006–2007 [Report on activities of the Accreditation Commission for 2006–2007] (Bratislava, Akreditačná komisia).
  • Slovak Accreditation Commission (SAC), 2008, Štatút Akreditačněj komisie [Statute of the Accreditation Commission] (Bratislava, Akreditačná komisia).
  • Slovak Accreditation Commission (SAC), 2011, Správa o činnosti Akreditačnej komisie za období 2009–2011 [Report on activities of the Accreditation Commission for 2009–2011] (Bratislava, Akreditačná komisia).
  • Smrčka, J., 2003, ‘Akreditace vysokoškolských studijních programů v letech 1999-2002’, [Accreditations of higher education study programmes in the period of 1999-2002]’, Aula, 11(2), pp. 4–10.
  • Stensaker, B., 2003, ‘Trance, transparency and transformation: The impact of external quality monitoring on higher education’, Quality in Higher Education, 9(2), pp. 151–59.
  • Stensaker, B., 2011, ‘Accreditation of higher education in Europe: moving towards the US model?’, Journal of Education Policy, 26(6), pp. 757–69.
  • Stensaker, B. & Harvey, L., 2006, ‘Old wine in new bottles? A comparison of public and private accreditation schemes in higher education’, Higher Education Policy, 19(1), pp. 65–85.
  • Stensaker, B. & Harvey, L. (Eds.), 2010, Accountability in Higher Education: Global perspectives on trust and power (London, Routledge).
  • Szanto, T.R., 2004, ‘Programme accreditation in Hungary: lessons from the past, plans for the future’, Quality in Higher Education, 10(1), pp. 59–64.
  • Teichler, U., 2005, ‘Research on higher education in Europe’, European Journal of Education, 40(4), pp. 447–69.
  • Temple, P. & Billing, D., 2003, ‘Higher education quality assurance organisations in Central and Eastern Europe’, Quality in Higher Education, 9(3), pp. 243–58.
  • Tomusk, V., 2000, ‘When East meets West: decontextualizing the quality of East European higher education’, Quality in Higher Education, 6(3), pp. 175–85.
  • Tremblay, K. & Kis, V., 2008, ‘Assuring and improving quality’ in Santiago, P., Tremblay, K., Basri, E. & Arnal, E. (Eds.) Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society, volume 1 (Paris, OECD).
  • Vedung, E., 1998, ‘Policy instruments: typologies and theories’, in Bemelmans-Videc, M.L., Rist, R. & Vedung, E. (Eds.) Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation (New Brunswick, Transaction).
  • Vinš, V., 2004, ‘Hodnocení Akreditační komisí’ [Evaluations by the Accreditation Commission], Aula, 12(special issue), pp. 2–17.
  • Vroeijenstijn, A.I., 1995, Improvement and Accountability: Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. Guide for external quality assessment in higher education (London, Jessica Kingsley).
  • Van Vught, F.A. & Westerheijden, D.F., 1994, ‘Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education’, Higher Education, 28(3), pp. 355–71.
  • van der Wende, M. & Westerheijden, D.F., 2003, ‘Degrees of trust or trust of degrees? Quality assurance and recognition’, in File, J. & Goedegebuure, L. (Eds.) Real-time Systems: Reflections on higher education in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia (Brno, CHEPS and VUTIUM Press).
  • Westerheijden, D.F. & Kohoutek, J., 2014, ‘Implementation and translation: from European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance to education quality work in higher education institutions’, in Eggins, H. (Ed.) Drivers and Barriers to Achieving Quality in Higher Education (Sense, Rotterdam).
  • Winter, S., 2003, ‘Implementation perspectives: status and reconsideration’, in Peters, G.B. & Pierre, J. (Eds.) Handbook of Public Administration (London, Sage).
  • Wolff, R.A., 2005, ‘Accountability and accreditation: can reform match increasing demands?’, in Burke, J.C. (Ed.) Achieving Accountability in Higher Education: Balancing public, academic and market demands (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
  • Zákon o vysokých školách č. 111/1998 Sb. [The Act no. 111/1998 Coll. on Higher Education] (Praha, Poslanecká sněmovna).
  • Zákon o vysokých školách č. 131/2002 Sb. [The Act no. 131/2002 Coll. on Higher Education] (Bratislava, Národna rada Slovenskej republiky).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.