Ranking quality in higher education: guiding or misleading?

References

• Almgren, E., 2009, Ranking of Universities and Higher Education Institutions for Student Information Purposes? (Stockholm, Högskoleverket).
   Google Scholar
• Askling, B., 2007, Om sakkunskap och expertis i nationella utvärderingar och Kvalitetsbedömningar [Knowledge and expertise in national evaluation and quality assessments]. (Göteborg, Göteborgs universitet).
   Google Scholar
• Bergseth, B., 2007, Utvärdering av grundutbildningar i medicin och vård vid svenska universitet och högskolor [Evaluation of education programmes in medical and health care at Swedish universities and colleges] (Stockholm, Högskoleverket).
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., 2003, Teaching for Quality Learning at University (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G., 1986, ‘Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement’, The Lancet, 327(8476), pp. 307–310.10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, R., 2000, ‘Fantasy higher education: university and college league tables’, Quality in Higher Education, 6(1), pp. 41–60.10.1080/13538320050001063
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D. & Soo, M., 2003, A League Table of League Tables: A Cross-National Analysis of University Ranking Systems, Research Program on Public Policy for Academic Quality (PPAQ) (Dublin, INQAAHE).
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D. & Soo, M., 2005, ‘Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: a cross-national analysis of university ranking systems’, Higher Education, 49(4), pp. 495–533.10.1007/s10734-004-1746-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 2005, Standards and Guidelines For Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (Helsinki, ENQA).
   Google Scholar
• Finnie, R. & Usher, A., 2005, Measuring the Quality of Post-secondary Education: Concepts, current practices and a strategic plan, Canadian Policy Research Group (CPRN) Research Paper W|28, April 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Forneng, S., Lind, I. & Nybom, T., (Urank) 2014, Sveriges universitetsranking, 2007. Available at http://www.urank.se/artiklar/?news_id=172&news_page=1 (accessed 15 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Franke, S. & Nitzler, R., 2008, Att kvalitetssäkra högre utbildning – en utvecklande resa från Umeå till Bologna [Quality assurance of higher education - a developmental travel from Umeå to Bologna] (Pozkal, Studentlitteratur AB).
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill 1999/2000:28, (Stockholm, Swedish Government).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., 2008, ‘Editorial. Rankings of higher education institutions: a critical review’, Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), pp. 187–207.10.1080/13538320802507711
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., 2007, ‘The impact of league tables and ranking systems on higher education decision making’, Higher Education Management and Policy, OECD, 19(2), pp. 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hägg, I. & Wedlin, L., 2013, ‘Standards for quality? A critical appraisal of the Berlin principles for international rankings of universities’, Quality in Higher Education, 19(3), pp. 326–342.10.1080/13538322.2013.852708
   Google Scholar
• Högskoleverket (HSV), 2007a, Studentspegeln (Stockholm, Högskoleverket).
   Google Scholar
• Högskoleverket (HSV), 2007b, Universitet & högskolor [Universities & Colleges] (Stockholm, Högskoleverket).
   Google Scholar
• Högskoleverket (HSV), 2008, Besluts PM över uppföljning av ifrågasatta examensrätter inom vård och medicin [Decision PM of monitoring contested programmes in medical and health care] (Stockholm, Högskoleverket).
   Google Scholar
• International Rankings Expert Group (IREG), 2006, Berlin Principles on Rankings of Higher Education Institutions. Available at http://www.iregobservatory.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=41&Itemid=48 (accessed 15 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B.M. & Stensaker, B. (Eds.), 2009, University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education (Rotterdam, Sence).
   Google Scholar
• Longden, B., 2011, ’Methodological issues of university rankings’, in Shin, J.C., Toutkoushian, R.K. & Teichler, U. (Eds.) University Rankings Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Maclean’s, 2007, University Rankings. Available at http://www.macleans.ca/education/unirankings/our-17th-annual-rankings (accessed 15 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. & van der Wende, M., 2007, ‘To rank or to be ranked: the impact of global rankings in higher education’, Journal of Studies in International Education 11(3–4), pp. 306–329.
   Google Scholar
• Media Academy Confidence Barometer, 2012. Available at http://medieakademien.se/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/2012_MedieAkedemins_Fortroendebarometer.pdf (accessed 15 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Myles, P.S. & Cui, J., 2007, ‘Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures’, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 99(3), pp. 309–311.10.1093/bja/aem214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Agency for Higher Education (NAHE), 2001, National Review of Subjects and Programmes in Sweden (Stockholm, Högskoleverket).
   Google Scholar
• Rabow, I. & Rabow, H., 2005, Rankning av Universitet – en kort översikt [Ranking of Universities - a brief outline] (Lund, Lunds Universitet).
   Google Scholar
• Sadlak, J., Merisotis, J. & Liu, N.C., 2008, ‘University rankings: seeking prestige, raising visibility and embedding quality – the editors’ views’, Higher Education in Europe, 33(2/3), pp. 195–199.
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, J. & Saroyan, A., 2007, ‘League tables as policy instruments: uses and misuses’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2), pp. 31–68.
   Google Scholar
• Svenskt Näringsliv [Confederation of Swedish Enterprise], 2014. Available at http://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/sokresultat/?q=högskolekvalitet (accessed 15 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Higher Education Act, 1992:1434, (Stockholm, Swedish Government)
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) & Institute for Statistics (UIS), 2012. Available at http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Pages/tertiary-education.aspx (accessed 15 September 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Usher, A. & Medow, 2009, ‘A global survey of university rankings and league tables’, in Kehm, B.M. & Stensaker, B., (Eds.) University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education, (Rotterdam, Sense).
   Google Scholar
• Usher, A. & Savino, M., 2006, A World of Difference: A global survey of university league tables (Toronto, Educational Policy Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Usher, A. & Savino, M., 2007, ‘A global survey of university ranking and league tables’, Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), pp. 103–125.
   Google Scholar
• van Dyke, N., 2005, ‘Twenty years of university report cards’, Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), pp. 103–125.
   Google Scholar
• Webometrics Ranking of World Universities, 2014. Available at http://www.webometrics.info/en/node/52 (accessed 15 September 2014).
   Google Scholar