778
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Students’ perceptions of a ‘quality’ advisory relationship

References

  • Barnes, B.J., Wolfe, E.W., Chard, L.A., Stassen, M.L.A. & Williams, E.A., 2011, ‘An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the graduate advising survey for doctoral students’, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, pp. 1–14.
  • Deuchar, R., 2008, ‘Facilitator, director or critical friend?: contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles’, Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), pp. 489–500.10.1080/13562510802193905
  • Feinberg, W. & Soltis, J., 2004, Schools and Society (New York, NY, Teachers College Press).
  • Foucault, M., 1980, Power-knowledge (Brighton, Harvester).
  • Foucault, M., 1984, Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth (New York, NY, New Press).
  • Green, P., 2005, Supervising Postgraduate Research: Contexts and processes, theories and practices (Melbourne, RMIT University Press).
  • Green, P. & Usher, R., 2003, ‘Fast supervision: changing supervisory practice in changing times’, Studies in Continuing Education, 25(1), pp. 37–50.10.1080/01580370309281
  • Halse, C., 2011, ‘‘Becoming a supervisor’: the impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning’, Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), pp. 557–570.10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
  • Halse, C. & Malfroy, J., 2010, ‘Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work’, Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), pp. 79–92.10.1080/03075070902906798
  • Heath, T., 2002, ‘A quantitative analysis of PhD students’ views of supervision’, Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), pp. 41–53.
  • Kiley, M., 2011, ‘Government policy and research higher degree education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6), pp. 629–640.10.1080/1360080X.2011.621189
  • Lee, A., 2008, ‘How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision’, Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), pp. 267–281.10.1080/03075070802049202
  • Lee, A. & McKenzie, J., 2011, ‘Evaluating doctoral supervision: tensions in eliciting students’ perspectives’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1), pp. 69–78.10.1080/14703297.2010.543773
  • Lovitts, B.E. & Nelson, C., 2000, ‘The hidden crisis in graduate education: attrition from Ph.D. programs’, Academe, 86(6), pp. 44–50.10.2307/40251951
  • Qi, J., 1997, ‘Postmodernism and marxism: what is called into question in the educational discourse?’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, USA, 24–28 March.
  • Raineri, M., 2013, ‘Revisiting the past in view of the future’, Evolution & Development, 15(1), pp. 1–2.
  • Ward, K. & Gardner, S.K., 2008, ‘Three magic letters: getting to Ph.D. (review)’, Journal of Higher Education, 79(2), pp. 240–242.10.1353/jhe.2008.0009
  • Zeegers, M. & Barron, D., 2012, ‘Pedagogical concerns in doctoral supervision: a challenge for pedagogy’, Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), pp. 20–30.
  • Zhao, F., 2003, ‘Transforming quality in research supervision: a knowledge-management approach’, Quality in Higher Education, 9(2), pp. 187–197.10.1080/13538320308149

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.