Between quality and control: what can we learn from higher education quality assurance policy in the Netherlands

References

• Brennan, J., 1997, ‘Authority, legitimacy and change: the rise of quality assessment in higher education’, Higher Education Management, 9(1), pp. 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Future Sustainability of the Dutch Higher Education System, 2010, Threefold Differentiation: Recommendations of the Committee on the Future Sustainability of the Dutch Higher Education System,  House of Representatives, 31288, no. 96 (Koninklijke Broese en Peereboom, Den Haag).
   Google Scholar
• Committee for the Review of the Accreditation Organization of The Netherlands and Flanders (NVAO), (2007), Report of the Committee for the Review of the Accreditation Organization of The Netherlands and Flanders (NVAO) (Den Haag, NVAO).
   Google Scholar
• De Weert, E. and Boezerooy, P., 2007, Higher Education in the Netherlands. Country report (Enschede, CHEPS).
   Google Scholar
• Goedegebuure, L., Maassen, P. and Westerheijen. D.F., 1990, Peer Review and Performance Indicators: Quality assessment in British and Dutch higher education (Utrecht, Lemma).
   Google Scholar
• Inspectie van het Onderwijs, 2017, De opleidingsaccreditatie in het hoger onderwijs: Tussenbericht over de kwaliteit van het Nederlandse accreditatiestelsel [Programme Accreditation in Higher Education: Interim report on the quality of the Dutch accreditation system] (Utrecht, Inspectie van het Onderwijs).
   Google Scholar
• Jeliazkova, M. & Westerheijden, D.F., 2004, ‘The Netherlands: a leader in quality assurance follows the accreditation trend’, in Schwarz, S. & Westerheijden D.F. (Eds.), Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area, pp. 323–45 (Dordrecht, Kluwer).
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, P. and Van Vught, F., 1988, ‘An intriguing janus-head: the two faces of the new governmental strategy for higher education in the Netherlands’, European Journal of Education, 23(1/2), pp. 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Onderwijs Cultuur en Wetenschap, 2008, Naar een volwassen bachelor-masterstructuur [Towards a Grown-Up Bachelor-Master Structure] (Den Haag, Ministerie van Onderwijs Cultuur en Wetenschap).
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G. & Van Vught, F.A., 1991, Prometheus Bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe (Oxford, Pergamon).
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G., 1988, ‘On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: an overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe 1986–1988’, European Journal of Education, 23(1/2), pp. 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlands-Vlaamse Accreditatieorganisatie (NVAO), 2010, Assessment Frameworks for the Higher Education Accreditation System (Den Haag, NVAO).
   Google Scholar
• Nederlands-Vlaamse Accreditatieorganisatie (NVAO), 2014, Beoordelingskaders accreditatiestelsel hoger onderwijs [Assessment Frameworks for the Higher Education Accreditation System] (Den Haag, NVAO).
   Google Scholar
• Nederlands-Vlaamse Accreditatieorganisatie (NVAO), 2016, Belangrijke verschillen Beoordelingskaders accreditatiestelsel hoger onderwijs Nederland 2014–2016. [Important Differences Assessment Frameworks Accreditation System the Netherlands 2014–2016] (Den Haag, NVAO).
   Google Scholar
• Perellon, J.F., 2011, The Development of Quality Assurance Policy in Higher Education: A comparative analysis of England, The Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland (London, University of London, Institute of Education: Doctoral Thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Van Vught, F.A., 1989, Governmental Strategies and Innovation in Higher Education (London, Jessica Kingsley).
   Google Scholar
• Van Vught, F.A. & Westerheijden, D.F., 1994, ‘Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education’, Higher Education, 28(3), pp. 355–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroeijenstijn, A.I., 1995, Improvement and Accountability: Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. Guide for external quality assessment in higher education (London, Jessica).
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, D.F., Cremonini, L., Kolster, R., Kottmann, A., Redder, L., Soo, M., Vossensteyn, H., & de Weert, E., 2008, New Degrees in the Netherlands: Evaluation of the bachelor-master structure and accreditation in Dutch higher education. Final report (The Hague, Ministry of Education, Science and Culture).
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, D.F., 1990, ‘Peers, performance, and power: quality assessment in the Netherlands’, in Goedegebuure, L.C.J., Maassen, P.A.M. & Westerheijden, D.F. (Eds.), Peer Review and Performance Indicators: Quality assessment in British and Dutch higher education, pp. 183–207 (Utrecht, Lemma).
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, D.F., 2007, ‘States and Europe and quality of higher education’, in Westerheijden, D.F., Stensaker, B. & Rosa, M.J. (Eds.), Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 73–95) (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, D.F., 2013, ‘Achieving the Focus on Enhancement?’, in R. Land & G. Gordon (Eds.), Enhancing Quality in Higher Education: International perspectives (pp. 39–48) (London, New York, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Witte, J., 2006, Change of Degrees and Degrees of Change: Comparing adaptations of European higher education systems in the context of the Bologna Process (Enschede, University of Twente).
   Google Scholar