A comparative study of relationship between the government and national quality assurance agencies in Australia, Japan, Malaysia and Taiwan: policy change, governance models, emerging roles

References

• Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L. & Rumbley, L.E., 2009, Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an academic revolution (Paris, UNESCO).
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government, 2018, National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students. Available at https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2017L01182 (accessed 21 January 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. & Jackson, K., 2013, Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo (Thousand Oaks, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M., 2015, ‘Quality assurance in the political context: in the midst of different expectations and conflicting goals’, Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 231–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmur, D., 2008, ‘A critical analysis of the INQAAHE guidelines of good practice for higher education quality assurance agencies’, Higher Education, 56(6), pp. 723–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. & Shah, T., 2000, Managing Quality in Higher Education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change (Buckingham, OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., 2013, ‘Mutuality meets the market: analysing changes in the control of quality assurance in United Kingdom higher education 1992–2012ʹ, Higher Education Quarterly, 67(4), pp. 420–37.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B., 1983, The Higher Education System: Academic organization in cross national perspectives (Berkeley, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K., 2007, Research Methods in Education (New York, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. & Bansel, P., 2007, ‘Neoliberalism and education’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3, pp. 247–59.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, H. & Stensaker, B., 2007, An Internal Representative System: The democratic vision university dynamics and European integration (Volume 19) (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D.D., 2011, ‘Governing quality’, in King, R., Marginson, S. & Naidoo, R. (Eds.), 2011, Handbook on Globalization and Higher Education, pp. 438–54 (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, M., 2012, ‘The transformation of the state as a “Governance Designer”: the case of French higher education policy’, paper prepared for the panel ‘Measuring Change in Higher Education Policy Governance in Europe’ at the Conference of the International Political Science Association (Madrid, the International Political Science Association).
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, M., Knill, C. & Vogtle, E.M., 2011, ‘An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance’, Higher Education, 62(5), pp. 665–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT), 2016, Revised Articles of Association (Taipei, HEEACT).
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT), 2018, 2017 Annual Report (Taipei, HEEACT).
   Google Scholar
• European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 2005, The Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. (Brussels, ENQA).
   Google Scholar
• European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 2012, Quality Procedures in the European Higher Education Area and Beyond: Third ENQA survey (Brussels, ENQA).
   Google Scholar
• European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 2015, The Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. (Brussels, ENQA).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Newton, J., 2007, ‘Transforming quality evaluation: moving on’, in Rosa, M.J., Stensaker, B. & Westerheijden, D.F., (Eds.), 2007, Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation, pp. 225–46 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Hénard, F., 2016, ‘Principle 3: quality and society’, in Uvalic-Trumbic, S. (Ed.), 2016, The CIQG International Quality Principles: Toward a shared understanding of quality, pp. 23–30 (Washington, D.C., Council for Higher Education Accreditation).
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT), 2016, Institutional Accreditation Handbook. (Taipei, HEEACT).
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT), 2020, HEEACT Self-Assessment Report. (Taipei, HEEACT).
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., 1994, The Interpretation of Documents and Material Culture (Thousand Oaks, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Hopbach, A., 2019, Reflecting on the Future of Quality Assurance. ENQA General Assembly, Yerevan. Available at https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/External-QA_Future-Perspectives.pdf (accessed April 12. 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Hou, A.Y.C., 2012, ‘Impact of excellence programs on Taiwan higher education in terms of quality assurance and academic excellence, examining the conflicting role of Taiwan’s accrediting agencies’, Asia Pacific Educational Review, 13, pp. 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, A.Y.C., 2016, ‘Principle 1: Quality and higher education providers’, In Uvalic-Trumbic, S. (Ed.), 2016, The CIQG International Quality Principles: Toward a shared understanding of quality, pp. 7–14 (Washington, D.C., Council for Higher Education Accreditation).
   Google Scholar
• Hou, A.Y.C., 2018, ‘Quality assurance system in Taiwan higher education: challenges and prospects’, Taiwan Insight. Available at https://taiwaninsight.org/2018/09/28/quality-assurance-system-in-taiwan-higher-education-challenges-and-prospects/(accessed 21 January 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Hou, A.Y.C., Hill, C., Hu, Z. & Lin, L., 2020, ‘What is driving Taiwan government for policy change in higher education after the year of 2016—in search of egalitarianism or pursuit of academic excellence?’, Studies in Higher Education (online). Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2020.1744126 (20 March 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Hou, A.Y.C., Ince, M., Tasi, S. & Chiang, C. L., 2015, ‘Quality assurance of quality assurance agencies from an Asian perspective: regulation, autonomy and accountability’, Asia Pacific Educational Review, 16, pp. 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incoronaton, D.H., 2014, Nonprofit Capacity Building (Ann Arbor, Alliant International University).
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Development Study, 2013, Learning About Qualitative Document Analysis. Available at https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opend ocs/bits ream/handl e/12345 6789/2989/PP%20InB rief%2013%20QD %20FIN AL2.pdf?seque nce=4 (accessed 1 June 2018).
   Google Scholar
• International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE), 2016, Guidelines of Good Practice. Available at http://www.inqaahe.org/sites/default/files/GGP2016.pdf (accessed 1 June 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D.S.L., 2014, ‘Regulating higher education: quality assurance and neo-liberal managerialism in higher education—a critical introduction’, Policy and Society, 33(3), pp. 155–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R., 2009, Governing Universities Globally (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J., 2015, ‘The international race for accreditation’, International Higher Education, 40, pp. 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Laffont, J. & Tirole, J., 1991, ‘The politics of government decision making: a theory of regulatory capture’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), pp. 1089–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaysia Qualification Agency (MQA), 2018, Self-Accreditation. Available at http://www2.mqa.gov.my/portal_swa/list_PPT_swa.cfm (accessed 1 January 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., 2011, ‘Imagining the global’, in King, R., Marginson, S. and Naidoo, R., (Eds.), Handbook on Globalization and Higher Education, pp. 10–39 (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S.S. Kaur, E. & Sawir, 2011, ‘Global, local, national in the Asia-Pacific’, in Marginson, S., Kaur, S. and Sawir, E. (Eds.), 2011, Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific, pp. 3–34 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. & Stella, A., 2007, External Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Making choices (Paris, UNESCO).
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. & Huberman, M., 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis, second edition (Beverly Hills, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• National Institution for Academic Degrees and Quality Enhancement of Higher Education (NIAD-QE), 2019, Role of NIAD-QE. Available at https://www.niad.ac.jp/english/en-about/role.html (accessed 8 June 2019).
   Google Scholar
• National Institution for Academic Degrees and Quality Enhancement of Higher Education (NIAD-QE). 2020. Research Activities. Available at https://www.niad.ac.jp/english/faculty/ (accessed 20 February 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Noda, A., Hou, A.Y.C., Shibui, S. & Chou, H.C., 2018, ‘Restructuring quality assurance frameworks: a comparative study between NIAD-QE in Japan and HEEACT in Taiwan’, Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 12(1), pp. 2–18.
   Google Scholar
• Oleksenko, R., Molodychenko, V. & Shcherbakova, N., 2018, ‘Neoliberalism in higher education as a challenge for future civilization’, Philosophy and Cosmology, 20, pp. 113–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J.P., 2007, ‘Institutional dynamics and European universities’ in Maassen, P. & Olsen, J.P., (Eds.), 2007, University Dynamics and European Integration (Vol.19), pp. 25–54 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Paintsil, R., 2016, Balancing Internal and External Quality Assurance Dynamics in Higher Education Institutions: A case study of University of Ghana (Oslo, Universitetet i Oslo).
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Malaysia, 2007, Malaysian Qualifications Agency Act 2007 (Kuala Lumpur, The Parliament of Malaysia).
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q., 2001, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (Thousand Oaks, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J., 2012, ‘Accountability, quality assurance and performativity: the changing role of the academic board’, Quality in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D.B., 2010, ‘Neoliberal ideology and public higher education in the United States’, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1, pp. 42–77.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P., 2017, ‘Global: international higher education and the “neo-liberal turn”’, in Mihut, G., Altbach, P.G. & de Wit, H. (Eds.), 2017, Understanding Higher Education Internationalization, pp. 73–75 (Rotterdam, Sense Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J.C., 2018, ‘Quality assurance systems as a higher education policy tool in Korea: international convergence and local contexts’, International Journal of Educational Development, (63), pp. 52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., 2007, ‘Quality as fashion: exploring the translation of a management idea into higher education’, in Rosa, M.J., Stensaker, B. & Westerheijden, D.F. (Eds.), 2007, Quality Assurance in Higher Education Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation, pp. 99–118 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J. & Westerheijden, D., 2011, ‘An in‐depth study on the impact of external quality assurance’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), pp. 465–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), 2015, Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015 – TEQSA Contextual Overview (Melbourne, TEQSA).
   Google Scholar
• Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), 2018, Official website. Available at https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us-0 (accessed 1 January 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Thurman, R., 2008, ‘Is capacity building making a comeback in the face of economic downturn?’ Stanford Social Innovation Review. Available at http://www.ssireview.og/blog/entry/is_capacitgy_building-making-a-comeback-in-the-face-of-economicdownturn (accessed 19 April 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Uvalić-Trumbić, S., (Ed.), 2016, The CIQG International Quality Principles: Toward a shared understanding of quality (Washington, D.C., CHEA).
   Google Scholar
• Van Vught, P. & de Boer, H., 2015, ‘Governance models and policy instrument’, in Huisman, J., de Boer, H., Dill, D.D., Souto-Otero., M. (Eds.), 2015, Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance, pp. 35–56 (New York, Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, D.F., Stensaker, B., Rosa, M.J. & Corbett, A., 2014, ‘Next generations, catwalks, random walks and arms races: conceptualizing the development of quality assurance schemes’, European Journal of Education, 49(3), pp. 421–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, D., 2016, ‘Global trend in quality assurance’, Paper at International Quality Assurance Conference, Nottingham, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar