An evolution of performance data in higher education governance: a path towards a ‘big data’ era?

References

• Agostino, D. & Arnaboldi, M., 2017, ‘Social media data used in the measurement of public service effectiveness: empirical evidence from Twitter in higher education institutions’, Public Policy and Administration, 32(4), pp. 296–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R. & Halwachi, J., 1987, ‘Performance indicators in higher education’, Higher Education, 16(4), 393–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M. & Dill, D., 2010, ‘The CHE-University Ranking in Germany’, in Dill, D. & Beerkens, M. (Eds.), 2010, Public Policies for Academic Quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments, pp. 61–82 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M., 2015, ‘Quality assurance in the political context: in the midst of different expectations and conflicting goals’, Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 231–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M., 2017, ‘Information issues. Higher education markets’, in Teixeira, P. & Shin, J. (Eds.), 2017, Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Belanger, C.H., Bali, S. & Longden, B., 2013, ‘How Canadian universities use social media to brand themselves’, Tertiary Education and Management, 20(1), pp. 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., 2018, ‘New public management or neoliberalism, higher education’, in Teixeira, P. & Shin, J. (Eds.), 2018, Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, A., 2014, Knowledge, Diversity and Performance in European Higher Education: A changing landscape (Cheltenham, Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Cave, M., Hanney, S., Henkel, M. & Kogan, M., 2006, The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: The challenge of the quality movement (London, Kingsley).
   Google Scholar
• Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), 2015, Performance-Based Funding and Performance Agreements in Fourteen Higher Education Systems, Report for the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. Available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/31149022.pdf (accessed 27 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D., 2008, Indicators of University Teaching and Learning Quality (Australian Learning and Teaching Council). Available at https://ltr.edu.au/resources/Indicators_of_University_Teaching_and_Learning_Quality.pdf (accessed 27 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Clouw, D., 2013, ‘An overview of learning analytics’, Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), pp. 683–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., Geuna, A., Lepori, B., Bach, L., Bogetoft, P., 2011, ‘The European university landscape: a micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project’, Research Policy, 40(1), pp. 148–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C., Ho, A. & Mitros, P., 2016, ‘Big data analysis in higher education: promises and pitfalls’, EDUCAUSE Review, 51(5), pp. 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR), 2011, ‘Development of performance measurement instruments in higher education: discussion paper’. Available at http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A52066 (accessed 15 January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D. & Soo, M., 2005, ‘Academic quality, league tables and public policy: a cross-national analysis of university ranking systems’, Higher Education, 49(4), pp. 495–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewell, P.T., 2010, ‘The US National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)’, in Dill, D. & Beerkens, M. (Eds.), 2010, Public Policies for Academic Quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments, pp. 83–98 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., 2012, The State of Learning Analytics in 2012: A review and future challenges, technical report KMI-12-01 (Milton Keynes, Knowledge Media Institute, Open University).
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K.-L. & James, R., 2010, ‘The course experience questionnaire, graduate destination survey, and learning and teaching performance fund in Australia’, in Dill, D. & Beerkens, M. (Eds.), 2010, Public Policies for Academic Quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments, pp. 99–120 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A., Cakitaki, B. & Brett, M., 2018, Principles for Equity in Higher Education Performance Funding, Report for the National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education Research (Melbourne, Centre for Higher Education Equity and Diversity Research at La Trobe University).
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), 2014, Review of the National Student Survey Report to the UK Higher Education Funding Bodies (London, HEFCE).
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P. & Barber, M., 2014, Preparing for a Renaissance in Assessment (London, Pearson).
   Google Scholar
• Jarratt, A., 1985, Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities (London, Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals).
   Google Scholar
• Lavertu, S., 2016, ‘We all need help: “Big data” and the mismeasure of public administration’, Public Administration Review, 76, pp. 864–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiber, T., 2019, ‘A general theory of learning and teaching and a related comprehensive set of performance indicators for higher education institutions’, Quality in Higher Education, 25(1), pp. 76–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, P. & Siemens, G., 2011, ‘Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education’, Educause Review, 46(5), pp. 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Loukkola, T., Peterbauer, H. & Gover, A., 2020, Exploring Higher Education Indicators (Brussels, European University Association).
   Google Scholar
• Manyika, J., Chui, M. & Brown, B., 2011, Big Data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity (New York, McKinsey Global Institute Report).
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, M. & Dunleavy, P., 2013, ‘The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 371, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M., 2018, ‘Using indicators in higher education policy: between accountability, monitoring and management’, in Hazelkorn, E., Coates, H. & McCormick, A.C. (Eds), 2018, Research Handbook on Quality, Performance and Accountability in Higher Education, pp. 139–48 (Cheltenham, Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, A. & Brynjolfsson, E., 2012, ‘Big data: the management revolution exploiting vast new flows of information can radically improve your company’s performance’, Harvard Business Review, 90(10), pp. 60–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullich, J., 2013, Closing the Big Data Gap in Public Sector (Bloomberg Businessweek Research Services, Real-Time Enterprise).
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, M., 2014, ‘Doing what works: governing in the age of big data’, Public Administration Review, 74(5), pp. 555–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for Students (OFS), 2020, A Matter of Principles: Regulating in the student interest, Insight 7 October 2020. Available at https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/2d22f2c7-ccc5-4489-b7d1-59605f166fa9/insight-brief-a-matter-of-principles-regulating-in-the-student-interest-oct-2020.pdf (accessed 25 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2013, Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes: Feasibility Study Report (Paris, OECD). Available at http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/AHELO%20FS%20Report%20Volume%201%20Executive%20Summary.pdf (accessed 27 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S., 2013, ‘Characterisation of the use of Twitter by Australian universities’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(4), pp. 333–44.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A.G., 2012, ‘The evolution of big data and learning analytics in American higher education’, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(3), pp. 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., 2018, ‘Performance management 40 years on: a review’, Public Money & Management, 38(3), pp. 167–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, N., Agasisti, T. & De Witte, K., 2017, ‘Big data and the measurement of public organizations’ performance and efficiency: the state-of-the-art’, Public Policy and Administration, 32(4), pp. 263–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizer, J., Spee, A. & Bormans, R., 1992, ‘The rôle of performance indicators in higher education’, Higher Education, 24(2), pp. 133–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, S. & Prinsloo, P., 2013, ‘Learning analytics: ethical issues and dilemmas’, American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), pp. 1510–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustainable Quality Enhancement in Higher Education Learning and Teaching (SQELT-PI), 2020, SQELT Comprehensive Performance Indicator Set, Erasmus+ Strategic Partnership SQELT. Available at https://www.evalag.de/fileadmin/dateien/pdf/forschung_international/sqelt/Intellectual_outputs/sqelt_perfindicset4_o9_201127_final_sec.pdf (accessed 27 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, S., 2018, A Guide to UK League Tables in Higher Education, HEPI Report 101. Available at https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/HEPI-A-Guide-to-UK-League-Tables-in-Higher-Education-Report-101-EMBARGOED-4-JAN-2018.pdf (accessed 27 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki (nd) UniHow website. Available at https://studies.helsinki.fi/instructions/article/unihow-system-and-howulearn-questionnaire (accessed 27 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Van der Voort, H.G., Klievink, A.J., Arnaboldib, M. & Meijer, A.J., 2019, ‘Rationality and politics of algorithms: will the promise of big data survive the dynamics of public decision making?’, Government Information Quarterly, 36, pp. 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W. & van de Walle, S., 2008, Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is used (London, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S. & Leeuw, F.L., 2002, ‘The performance paradox in the public sector’, Performance & Management Review, 25(3), pp. 267–81.
   Google Scholar
• Viberga, O., Hatakkab, M., Bältera, O. & Mavroudia, A., 2018, ‘The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education’, Computers in Human Behavior, 89, pp. 98–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, D.S., 1986, Academic Quality Rankings of American Colleges and Universities (Springfield, IL, Schenkman).
   Google Scholar