Learning to teach literacy through collaborative discussions of student work

References

• Allen, D., & Blythe, T. (2004). The facilitator’s book of questions: Tools for looking together at student and teacher work. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, T. R., Rupley, W. H., & Nichols, M. D. (2007). The effective teacher of reading: Considering the “what” and “how” of instruction. The Reading Teacher, 60, 432–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, M. T., Adams, A., Sindelar, P., Waldron, N., & Vanhover, S. (2006). Learning from collaboration: The role of teacher qualities. Exceptional Children, 72, 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, M. T., Ross, D. D., Colon, E. P., & McCallum, C. L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. Journal of Special Education, 38, 242–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehl, D. (2001). Classroom strategies for interactive learning. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Carini, P. F. (2000). A letter to parents and teachers on some ways of looking at and reflecting on children. In M. Himley & P. F. Carini (Eds.), From another angle: Children’s strengths and school standards (pp. 56–65). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clift, R. T., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 309–424). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conderman, G. J., & Katsiyannis, A. (2002). Instructional issues and practices in secondary special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Data Accountability Center.(2008). Profiles of parts B and C programs in states and outlying areas, 2001–02 through 2006–07. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ideadata.org/TrendDataReports.asp
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1964/1904). The relation of theory to practice. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), John Dewey on education (pp. 313–339). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girod, G. R. (2002). Connecting teaching and learning: A handbook for teacher educators on teacher work sample methodology. New York, NY: AACTE.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, C. L., Jimènez, R. T., & Roller, C. M. (2002). Reclaiming secondary reading interventions: From limited to rich conceptions, from narrow to broad conversations. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 484–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haager, D., Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Graves, A. (2003). The English language learner observation instrument for beginning readers. In S. Vaughn & K. L. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A. (2004). Comprehending expository text: Promising strategies for struggling readers and students with reading disabilities? Reading Research and Instruction, 44, 75–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. (1974). I, thou and it. In D. Hawkins (Ed.), The informed vision: Essays on learning and human nature (pp. 48–63). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. T., Parker-Katz, M., Bryant, A., Zurheide, G., Keel, J., Muhammad, M., & Lee, G. (2011, April). Collaborative teacher network: Findings related to increasing teachers’ knowledge of content area reading strategies. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Researcher Association. New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M., Scruggs, T., & Graetz, J. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHatton, P. A., & McCray, E. D. (2007). Inclination toward inclusion: Perceptions of elementary and secondary education teacher candidates. Action in Teacher Education, 29, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. W., Bean, T. W., Birdyshaw, D., & Rycik, J. A. (2000). Adolescent literacy: A position statement for the adolescent literacy commission of the international reading association. Newark, DE: International Reading Association
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups ( NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Parker-Katz, M., & Hughes, M. T. (2008). Preparing special education mentors: Classroom artifacts as a vehicle for learning teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 268–282.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 291–309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates, V. (2000). What will be the social implications and interactions of schooling in the next millennium? Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 421–422.
   Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Risko, V. J., Roller, C. M., Cummins, C., Bean, R. M., Block, C. C., Anders, P. L., & Flood, J. (2008). A critical analysis of research on reading teacher education. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 252–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPeNSE. (2002). General education teachers’ role in special education: Study of personnel needs in special education. Retrieved from: http://ferdig.coe.ufl.edu/spense/
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-age reading instruction in low-income schools. Elementary School Journal, 101, 121–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 176–200). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education: National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Teacher preparation and professional development: 2000. Washington, DC: NCES. 2001-088
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward-Lonergan, J. M. (2010). Expository discourse intervention: Helping school-age children and adolescents with language disorders master the language of the curriculum. In M. Nippold & C. Scott (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults. Development and disorders (pp. 241–273). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar