Teachers’ performances during a practical dynamic open inquiry process

References

• Andrews, D., & Lewis, M. (2002). The experience of a professional community: Teachers developing a new image of themselves and their workplace. Educational Research, 44, 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay, L. D., & Orgill, M. (2010). Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in the Science Teacher, 1998–2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. (1998). Teacher development in science education. In B. J. Fraser, & K. J. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 681–693). Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, L., Bowen, G. M., & Alsop, S. (2006). Teachers’ tendencies to promote student-led science projects: Associations with their views about science. Science Education, 90, 400–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., & Lundberg, B. K. S. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 351–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrae, S. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 22, 37–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (2001). National science education standards as a catalyst for change: The essential role of professional development. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Professional development planning and design (pp. 1–12). Reston, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crockett, M. D. (2002). Inquiry as professional development: Creating dilemmas through teachers’ work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 609–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresner, M., & Worley, E. (2006). Teacher research experiences, partnerships with scientists, and teacher networks sustaining factors from professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. R., Pilitsis, V., & Piegaro, M.(2010). Development of preservice teachers’ ability to critique and adapt inquiry-based instructional materials.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided science inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90, 453–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 475–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, D. B. (2010). Structures and improvisation for inquiry-based science instruction: A teacher’s adaptation of a model of magnetism activity. Science Education, 94, 142–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., & Berkowitz, A. R. (2000). Teachers as inquiry learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2008). Question posing, inquiry, and modelling skills of high school chemistry students in the case-based computerized laboratory environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 597–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazempour, M. (2009). Impact of inquiry-based professional development on core conceptions and teaching practices: A case study. Science Educator, 18, 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kirch, S. A. (2010). Identifying and resolving uncertainty as a mediated action in science: A comparative analysis of the cultural tools used by scientists and elementary science students at work. Science Education, 94, 308–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, J. S., & Lederman, N. G.(2004). Early elementary students’ and teachers’ understanding of nature of science and scientific inquiry: Lessons learned from Project ICAN. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, B.-R. (2004). Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the Web. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 627–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 517–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunsford, E., Melear, C. T., Roth, W.-M., Perkins, M., & Hickok, L. G. (2007). Proliferation of inscriptions and transformations among preservice science teachers engaged in authentic science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 538–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69, 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, W., Fazio, X., Bartley, A., & Jones, D. (2008). Inquiry experience and reflection: Pre-science teachers’ capacity for teaching inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 477–494.
   Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2009). Inquiry-based science instruction: What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. A. (2008). Individual inquiry investigations in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 117–134.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W. (2009). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 422–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke, H. M., & Coble, C. R. (1997). Teachers designing curriculum as professional development: A model for transformational science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 773–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 737–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V.(2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. European Communities. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig, G. H., Dubosarsky, M., Mason, A., Carlson, S., & Murphy, B. (2011). We look more, listen more, notice more: Impact of sustained professional development on head start teachers’ inquiry-based and culturally-relevant science teaching practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 566–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 197–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 1137–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H. (2002). In service training or professional development: Contrasting opportunities in a school/university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 815–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Authentic scientific inquiry as a context for teaching nature of science: Identifying critical elements for success. In L. Flick & N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 331–156). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. C., & Anderson, C. W. (1999). Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 755–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Valk, T., & de Jong, O. (2009). Scaffolding science teachers in open-inquiry teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 829–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez, J., & Cowan, M. B. (2001). Moving teachers from mechanical to mastery: The next level of science implementation. In P. Bowers & J. Rhoton (Eds.), Professional development leadership and the diverse learner (pp. 11–22). Reston, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2002). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87, 112–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38, 321–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, C. F., & Hunang, S. C. (2001). Authentic learning about tree frogs by preservice biology teachers in open-inquiry research settings. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(D), 11, 1–10. Research in Science Education, 42, 581–608.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. G., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42, 589–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practices. Research in Science Education, 37, 423–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion, M., & Slezak, M. (2005). It takes two to tango: In dynamic inquiry, the self-directed student acts in association with the facilitating teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 875–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion, M., Slezak, M., Shapira, D., Link, E., Bashan, N., Brumer, M., … Valanides, N. (2004). Dynamic, open inquiry in biology learning. Science Education, 88, 728–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research. Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar