Parallel professionalism in an era of standardisation

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 30–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, P. G., & Rossman, G. B. (1994).The Massachusetts Education Reform Act: What is it and will it work? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 377 559). Retrieved from EBSCOHost ERIC database.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (1989). Teachers and texts. New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M. (2004). The virtue of accountability: System redesign, inspection, and incentives in the era of informed professionalism. Journal of Education, 185, 7–38.
   Google Scholar
• Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booher-Jennings, J. (2006). Rationing education in an era of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 756–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–536). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2006). Troubled images of teaching in No Child Left Behind. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 668–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). No Child Left Behind and high school reform. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 642–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of ‘No Child Left Behind’. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10, 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 277–692.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Smethem, L. (2009). The effects of reform: Have teachers really lost their sense of professionalism? Journal of Educational Change, 10, 141–157.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., & Kington, A. (2006). Variations in the work and lives of teachers: Relative and relational effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12, 169–192.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, C. (2002). Experience counts: Career stage and teachers’ responses to mathematics education reform. Educational Policy, 16, 311–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56, 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J., & Drayton, B. (2004). State testing and inquiry-based science: Are they complementary or competing reforms? Journal of Educational Change, 5, 345–387.
   Google Scholar
• Fusarelli, L. D. (2004). The potential impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on equity and diversity in American education. Educational Policy, 18, 71–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148–170.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. F. (1983). School subjects and curriculum change. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G., & Scharmann, L. (2008). Initial impacts of No Child Left Behind on elementary science education. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: History and Practise, 6, 151–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 3–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2008). Beyond standardisation: Powerful new principles for improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C. (2007). Mathematical knowledge of middle school teachers: Implications for the No Child Left Behind policy initiative. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J., & Rentner, D. S. (2006). Ten big effects of the No Child Left Behind Act on public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 88, 110–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., & Sunderman, G. L. (2005). Measuring academic profiency under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for educational equity. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893–1958 (3rd ed.). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., & Miles, M. B. (1990). Improving the urban high school: What works and why. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovely, S., & Buffum, A. G. (2007). Generations at school: Building an age-friendly learning community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Education. (2002). Elementary and Secondary Education Act: No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Fact Sheet. Retrieved fromhttp://www.doe.mass.edu/nclb/news02/guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Education. (2009). Spring 2009 MCAS tests: Summary of state results. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. A. (2007). ‘Expanding the moral community’ or ‘blaming the victim’? The politic of state education accountability policy. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 77–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota’s Promise. ( n.d.). Massachusetts Education Reform Act in summary. Retrieved fromhttp://www.minnesotaspromise.org/publications/documents/Massedreformsummary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Schools and staffing survey. Retrieved May 10, 2005, fromhttp://www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, B., & Sexton, D. (2009). Threat rigidity, school reform, and how teachers view their work inside current education policy contexts. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 9–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, A., Broadfoot, P., Croll, P., Osborn, M., & Abbot, D. (1994). Changing English primary schools: The impact of the Education Reform Act at key stage one. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16, 149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikes, P., Measor, L., & Woods, P. (1985). Teacher careers: Crises and continuities. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, J. (2011). Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113, 133–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone-Johnson, C. (2009). Regenerating teachers. In S. Rolls & H. Plauborg (Eds.), Teachers’ career trajectories and work lives (pp. 179–202). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stone-Johnson, C. (2011). Talkin’ bout my generation: Boomers, Xers, and educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Stone-Johnson, C. (2012). Not cut out to be an administrator: Generations, change and the career transition from teacher to principal. Education and Urban Society. doi:10.1177/0013124512458120
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York, NY: William and Morrow Company.
   Google Scholar
• Troman, G. (1996). The rise of the new professionals? The restructuring of primary teachers’ work and professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17, 473–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watters, E. (2004). Urban tribes: Are friends the new family? New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. (2011). Professionalism and the post-performative teacher: New teachers reflect on autonomy and accountability in the English school system. Professional Development in Education, 37, 389–409.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J. S., & Sandholtz, J. H. (2009). Constrained professionalism: Dilemmas of teaching in the face of test-based accountability. Teachers College Record, 111, 1065–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar