Dilemmatic spaces: high-stakes testing and the possibilities of collaborative knowledge work to generate learning innovations

References

• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, N. (2001). Researching policy implementation: Interview data analysis in institutional contexts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4, 51–69.10.1080/13645570118105
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2008). Unequal by design. High stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012a). My school. Melbourne: Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.myschool.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012b). NAPLAN (National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy). Melbourne: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.naplan.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, B. D. (2008). No child left behind and the assault on teachers’ professional practices and identities. Teachers and Teacher Education, 25, 1018–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity (Revised ed.). Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 547–560.10.1080/02680931003698544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber, B. (2011). Changing literacies, changing populations, changing places – English teachers’ work in an age of rampant standardisation. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10, 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Governments. (2008). National Education Agreement. Retrieved from http://www.coag.gov.au/schools_and_education
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2014). Rethinking neoliberalism. Journal of Sociology, 50, 150–163. doi:10.1177/144078331244225610.1177/1440783312442256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education Training and Employment. (2010). Smart schools national partnership (Queensland Annual Report for 2009). Retrieved April 25, 2013, from http://education.qld.gov.au/nationalpartnerships/three-form-initiatives.html
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, A. S., & Ellis, V. (2011). Connecting does not necessarily mean learning: Handbooks as mediating tools in school-university partnerships. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 465–476.10.1177/0022487111413605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransson, G., & Grannäs, J. (2013). Dilemmatic spaces in educational contexts – Towards a conceptual framework for dilemmas in teachers work. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19, 4–17. doi:10.1080/13540602.2013.74419510.1080/13540602.2013.744195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursh, D. (2013). Raising the stakes: High-stakes testing and the attack on public education in New York. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 574–588. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.75882910.1080/02680939.2012.758829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A. (2013). Seeking the analytic imagination: Reflections on the process of interpreting qualitative data. Qualitative Research, 13, 562–577. doi:10.1177/146879411244610810.1177/1468794112446108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A., Mills, M., & Pendergast, D. (2011). Fabricating an identity in neo‐liberal times: Performing schooling as ‘number one’. Oxford Review of Education, 37, 75–92.10.1080/03054985.2010.538528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, M. K., & McNaughton, S. (2009). Raising student achievement in poor communities through evidence-based conversations. In L. M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations (pp. 13–28). Milton Keynes: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H. (2013, March). Q&A with Henry Levin. In Lead the change series (Vol. 5, pp. 1–7). Washington, DC: AERA Educational Change Special Interest Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: AC/counting for educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 38, 355–382.10.1007/s13384-011-0041-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Creagh, S., & Vass, G. (2012). Education policy as numbers: Data categories and two Australian cases of misrecognition. Journal of Education Policy, 27, 315–333 doi:10.1080/02680939.2011.60547610.1080/02680939.2011.605476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttrell, W. (2003). Pregnant bodies, fertile minds. Gender, race and the schooling of pregnant teens. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). ‘Gap talk’ and the global rescaling of educational accountability in Canada. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 589–611. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.76707410.1080/02680939.2013.767074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2011). Teachers’ work in culturally and linguistically diverse schools. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 451–466.10.1080/13540602.2011.580521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 517–528.10.1080/13540602.2011.602059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2006). Recognising desire: A psychosocial approach to understanding education policy implementation and effect. Oxford Review of Education, 32, 487–503. doi:10.1080/0305498060088420110.1080/03054980600884201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2012). The role of affect in the adoption and implementation of resisted policies in public school settings (Unpublished Academic Paper). Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, L., & Mowbray, S. (2012). ‘We were expected to be equal’: Teachers and academics sharing professional learning through practitioner inquiry. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18, 455–468.10.1080/13540602.2012.696046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, T. (2003). Framing justice: Challenges for research. Journal of Educational Policy, 18, 229–252.10.1080/02680930305576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. M., & Kovacs, P. E. (2011). The impact of standards – Based reform on teachers: The case of ‘No Child Left Behind’. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 201–225. doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.53980210.1080/13540602.2011.539802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, M. (2012). We can’t build our dreams on suspicious minds: Neoliberalism, education policy, and the feelings left over. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 12, 387–400.10.1177/1532708612453004
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822390404
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T., & Gulson, K. N. (2013). Policy intentions and folds of the self. Educational Theory, 63, 51–67.10.1111/edth.2013.63.issue-1
   Google Scholar