The impact of disciplinary background and teaching experience on the use of evaluative language in teacher feedback

References

• Adcroft, A. (2011). The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 405–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & Walle, D. V. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 773–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. G., & Blackburn, R. T. (1981). The academic career as a developmental process. Journal of Higher Education, 52, 598–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., & Shemilt, D. (1974). Transmission and interpretation. Educational Review, 26, 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 157–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biberman-Shalev, L., Sabbagh, C., Resh, N., & Kramarski, B. (2011). Grading styles and disciplinary expertise: The mediating role of the teacher’s perception of the subject matter. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 831–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, G. M., & Seixas, P. (1998). Subjects and disciplines: Asymmetries in a collaborative curriculum development project. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 4, 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Brinko, K. T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: What is effective? The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 574–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, A. (2009). How do secondary school subject departments contribute to the learning of beginning teachers? In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Knowledge, values and educational policy: A critical perspective (pp. 263–272). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, T., Pittaway, S., Yost, H., & McCarthy, R. (2013). Students’ perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: Ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication and encourages progress. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 349–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 70–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantilli, R. D., & McDougall, D. E. (2009). A study of novice teachers: Challenges and supports in the first years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 814–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, A. (2011). The first three years: Experiences of early career teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 325–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Toro, M., Truman, M., & Walker, M. ( 2013). Are the principles of effective feedback transferable across disciplines? A comparative study of written assignment feedback in languages and technology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 816–830.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S. R., & Fishbach, A. (2012). Tell me what I did wrong: Experts seek and respond to negative feedback. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 22–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24, 5–11, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T., & Bailey, J. (2010). Developing standards-based report cards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helstad, K., & Lund, A. (2012). Teachers’ talk on students’ writing: Negotiating students’ texts in interdisciplinary teacher teams. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 599–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 269–274.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G. (2007). Developing an EAP writing course for Chinese ESL students. RELC Journal, 38, 67–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2015). Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & McKay, S. (2012). English language education in East Asia: Some recent developments. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33, 345–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & Wang, G. H. (2014). Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 14–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyatt, D. F. (2005). ‘Yes, a very good point!’: A critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on Master of Education assignments. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 339–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255–286.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, W. A. (2011). Variation among academic disciplines: An update on analytical frameworks and research. Journal of the Professoriate, 6, 9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacy approach. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 32–46). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1343–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F. (2009). Experience, theory, and practical wisdom in teaching and teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 225–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, H. J. (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20, 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 405–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, M. (2011). UAM CorpusTool (Version 2.8.7). Retrieved February 25, 2012, from http://www.wagsoft.com/CorpusTool/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Øgreid, A. K., & Hertzberg, F. (2009). Argumentation in and across disciplines: Two Norwegian cases. Argumentation, 23, 451–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orrell, J. (2006). Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 441–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 879–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resh, N. (2009). Justice in grades allocation: Teachers’ perspective. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 315–325.
   Google Scholar
• Schempp, P., Tan, S., Manross, D., & Fincher, M. (1998). Differences in novice and competent teachers’ knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 4, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. Washington, DC: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Spinks, S. (1998). Relating marker feedback to teaching and learning in psychology. In C. Candlin & G. Plum (Eds.), Researching academic literacies (pp. 147–167). Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 227–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulvik, M., & Langørgen, K. (2012). What can experienced teachers learn from newcomers? Newly qualified teachers as resource in schools. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18, 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Värlander, S. (2008). The role of students’ emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassermann, S. (2004). This teaching life: How I taught myself to teach. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. (2005). Lecturer and first year student (mis)understandings of assessment task verbs: ‘Mind the gap’. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 157–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar