Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills

References

• Ahonen, A., & Kankaanranta, M. (2015). Introducing assessment tools for 21st century skills in Finland. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (Vol. 2, pp. 213–225). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ahonen, A., & Kinnunen, P. (2015). How do students value the importance of twenty-first century skills? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59, 395–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.10.1787/19939019
   Google Scholar
• Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20, 533–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1–14.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307–359.10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B., Pea, R. D., & Engle, R. (2013). Advancing understanding of collaborative learning with data derived from video records. In C. Hmelo-Silver, A. O’Donnell, C. Chinn, & C. Chan (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 203–219). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25, 37–39.10.3102/0013189X025008037
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Casotti, G., Rieser-Danner, L., & Knabb, M. T. (2008). Successful implementation of inquiry-based physiology laboratories in undergraduate major and nonmajor courses. AJP: Advances in Physiology Education, 32, 286–296.10.1152/advan.00100.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, B. J., & Farrell, H. M. (2008). Student satisfaction with cooperative learning in an Accounting curriculum. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 5. Article 4.
   Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75, 27–61.10.3102/00346543075001027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J., Halász, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., Michel, A., Pepper, D., … Wiśniewski, J. (2009). Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education (CASE Network Reports No. 87). Warsaw: CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5
   Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, P. (2013). Multiphase method for analysing online discussions. Journal of Computer-assisted Learning, 29, 547–555.10.1111/jcal.2013.29.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, P., Arvaja, M., Hämäläinen, R., & Pöysä, J. (2010). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: A review of SCORE studies. In B. Ertl (Ed.), E-collaborative knowledge construction (pp. 180–194). New York, NY: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-61520-729-9
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Chinn, C. A., Chan, C. K., & O’Donnell, A. M. (2013). International handbook of collaborative learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.10.1080/00461520701263368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Group awareness tools: It's what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1046–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48, 25–39.10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Näykki, P. (2013). Analyzing regulation of motivation as an individual and social process – A situated approach. In M. Vauras & S. Volet (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 170–187). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 122–135.10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.012
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35, 287–315.10.1007/s11251-006-9008-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 403–420.10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 211–224.10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts – A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 59–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F., & Kessels, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–17.10.3102/0013189X028004004
   Google Scholar
• Krokfors, L., Kynäslahti, H., Stenberg, K., Toom, A., Maaranen, K., Jyrhämä, R., … Kansanen, P. (2011). Investigating Finnish teacher educators’ views on research‐based teacher education. Teaching Education, 22, 1–13.10.1080/10476210.2010.542559
   Google Scholar
• Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25, 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Loyens, S. M. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010). Problem-based learning. In S. Graham, A. Bus, S. Major, & L. Swanson (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Application to learning and teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 403–425). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo, K., Häkkinen, P., Leinonen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2002). Mechanisms of common ground in case-based web discussions in teacher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 247–265.10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00112-4
   Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Fischer, F. (2013). Help seeking in computer-supported collaborative science learning environments. In S. A. Karabenick & M. Puustinen (Eds.), Advances in help-seeking research and applications: The role of emerging technologies (pp. 99–120). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Kohnle, C., & Fischer, F. (2011). Computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning and classroom scripts: Effects on help-seeking processes and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 257–266.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Stegmann, K., Frete, A., & Streng, S. (2012). Orchestrating technology-enhanced collaborative learning: Effects of knowledge sharing and shared knowledge. In S. Abramovich (Ed.), Computers and education (Vol. 1, pp. 75–91). New York, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Patterns in elementary school students’ strategic actions in varying learning situations. Instructional Science, 41, 933–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., & Järvenoja, H. (2014). Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning – A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 1–14.10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2013). Draft PISA 2015 collaborative problem solving framework. Retrieved January 14, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• P21Skills (2013). Framework for 21st century learning. Partnership for 21st century skills. Retrieved January 12, 2013, from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework
   Google Scholar
• Paus, E., Werner, C. S., & Jucks, R. (2012). Learning through online peer discourse: Structural equation modeling points to the role of discourse activities in individual understanding. Computers & Education, 58, 1127–1137.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajuan, M., Beijaard, D. P., & Verloop, N. (2008). Student teachers’ perceptions of their mentors as internal triggers for learning. Teaching Education, 19, 279–292.10.1080/10476210802339951
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (Vol. 128, pp. 69–97) NATO ASO Series F: Computer and System Sciences. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1
   Google Scholar
• Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership, 67, 16–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybarczyk, B. J., Baines, A. T., McVey, M., Thompson, J. T., & Wilkins, H. (2007). A case-based approach increases student learning outcomes and comprehension of cellular respiration concepts. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35, 181–186.10.1002/(ISSN)1539-3429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning. Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Introduction: The new science of learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139519526
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schratzenstaller, A. (2010). The classroom of the past. In K. Mäkitalo-Siegl, J. Zottmann, F. Kaplan, & F. Fischer (Eds.), Classroom of the future: Orchestrating collaborative spaces (pp. 15–39). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 321–354.10.1207/s15327809jls0403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 630–634.10.1177/003172170909000905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeter, C. (2014). Toward Teacher Education Research That Informs Policy. Educational Researcher, 43, 146–153.10.3102/0013189X14528752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition: The collaborative locus of agency in CSCL. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 632–640). Taipei, Taiwan. Retrieved from http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/pub/cscl2005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2013). Transactive discourse in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 145–147.10.1007/s11412-013-9171-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Välijärvi, J. (2011). Teacher’s professional skills and research-based teacher education for the future. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 289–315.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments – Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37, 490–521.10.1177/1046496406292938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2010). 21st century skills: Discussion paper. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73–97.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J., Sherrod, S., & Walters, K. (2008). Project-based learning environments: Challenging preservice teachers to act in the moment. The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 220–233.10.3200/JOER.101.4.220-233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89–99.10.1177/0022487109347671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183. 10.3102/0002831207312909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2010). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar