618
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using action, reflection and modelling (ARM) in Malaysian primary schools: connecting ‘the ARM theory’ with student teachers’ reported practice

, , &
Pages 494-514 | Received 06 Nov 2014, Accepted 08 Apr 2016, Published online: 29 Jul 2016

References

  • Ali, R. M. (2007, November). Teacher talk in mathematics classrooms: Questioning to establish procedural competence. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, Penang, Malaysia.
  • Angelides, P., & Gibbs, P. (2006). Supporting the continued professional development of teachers through the use of vignettes. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33, 111–121.
  • Beattie, M. (2000). Narratives of professional learning: Becoming a teacher and learning to teach. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 1(2), 1–23.
  • Berry, A., & Loughran, J. (2002). Developing an understanding of learning to teach in teacher education. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 13–29). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom ( ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf
  • Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1974). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Carr, D. (1991). Educating the virtues. London: Routledge.
  • Carr, W. (2006). Education without theory. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 136–159.10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00344.x
  • Cheah, U. H. (2010, February). Assessment in primary mathematics classrooms in Malaysia. Paper for the Fourth APEC – Tsukuba International Conference, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Cheng, M. M. H., Cheng, A. Y. N., & Tang, S. Y. F. (2010). Closing the gap between the theory and practice of teaching: Implications for teacher education programmes in Hong Kong. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36, 91–104. doi:10.1080/02607470903462222
  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7
  • Denscombe, M. (1982). The ‘Hidden Pedagogy’ and its implications for teacher training. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 3, 249–265.10.1080/0142569820030303
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Desforges, C. (Ed.). (1995). An introduction to teaching: Psychological perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, NY: D. C. Heath The Project Gutenberg EBook #37423 release date 2011. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37423/37423-h/37423-h.htm10.1037/10903-000
  • Diamond, C. T. (1991). Teacher education as transformation. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Dickerson, C., Binti Abdullah, A., Bowtell, J., Graham, S., Jarvis, J., Jarvis, S., … Warren, V. (2011). Learning together through international collaboration in teacher education in Malaysia. Report of a project to develop a Bachelor of Education (Honours) in Primary Mathematics. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.
  • Dobbins, R. (1996). The challenge of developing a ‘Reflective Practicum’. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 24, 269–280.10.1080/1359866960240305
  • Edward, N. S. (2001). Evaluation of a constructivist approach to student induction in relation to students’ learning styles. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26, 429–440.10.1080/03043790127518
  • Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Routledge.
  • Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219–232.10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002
  • Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207–226.10.3102/00028312006002207
  • Galam, R. G. (1997, April and October). Curriculum development in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. Curriculum Development, 43–48.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1994). Teachers, public life and curriculum reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 69, 35–47.10.1080/01619569409538776
  • Giroux, H., & McLaren, P. (1987). Teacher education as a counter-public sphere: Notes towards a redefinition. In P. Popkewitz (Ed.), Critical studies in critical teacher education (pp. 266–297). London: Falmer Press.
  • Heng, L. W., & Khim, T. S. (2004). Reflective practice in Malaysian teacher education: Assumptions, practices and challenges. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.
  • Hill, L. (2000). Theory, practice and reflection: A pre-service primary mathematics education programme. Teachers and Teaching, 6, 23–39. doi:10.1080/135406000114735
  • Hirst, P. H. (2012). Educational theory. In P. H. Hirst (Ed.), Educational theory and its foundational disciplines (pp. 3–29). London: Routledge.
  • Hobson, A. J. (2003). Student teachers’ conceptions and evaluations of ‘theory’ in initial teacher training (ITT). Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 11, 245–261. doi:10.1080/1361126032000138300
  • Jarvis, J., Dickerson, C., Thomas, K., & Graham, S. (2014). The Action – Reflection – Modelling (ARM) pedagogical approach for teacher education: A Malaysia-UK project. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 89–118. doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n3.2
  • Kessels, J. P. A. M., & Korthagen, F. A. J. (1996). The relationship between theory and practice: Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 25, 17–22.10.3102/0013189X025003017
  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
  • Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–17.10.3102/0013189X028004004
  • Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020–1041. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022
  • Kroll, L. R. (2004). Constructing constructivism: How student-teachers construct ideas of development, knowledge, learning, and teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10, 199–221. doi:10.1080/1354060042000188035
  • Loughran, J. (1995). Practising what I preach: Modelling reflective practice to student teachers. Research in Science Education, 25, 431–451.10.1007/BF02357386
  • Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 33–43.10.1177/0022487102053001004
  • Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education. Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Loughran, J., & Berry, A. (2003, April 21–25). Modelling by teacher educators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 586–601. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001
  • Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning (pp. 1–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Miles, M. B. (1990). New methods for qualitative data collection and analysis: Vignettes and pre-structured cases. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3, 37–51.10.1080/0951839900030104
  • Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2003). Integrated curriculum for primary schools. Curriculum specifications – Mathematics year 3. Kuala Lumpur: Author.
  • Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2006). Integrated curriculum for primary schools. Curriculum specifications – Mathematics. Putrajaya: Author.
  • Misawa, K. (2011). The Hirst-Carr debate revisited: Beyond the theory-practice dichotomy. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45, 689–702.10.1111/jope.2011.45.issue-4
  • Moore, R. (2003). Reexamining the field experiences of preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 31–42.10.1177/0022487102238656
  • Noel, K. (2000). ‘Experiencing the Theory’: Constructivism in a pre-service teacher preparation program. Teachers and Teaching, 6, 183–196. doi:10.1080/713698712
  • OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/berlin/43541655.pdf
  • Ong, S. L., & Tan, M. (2008). Mathematics and Science in English: Teachers experience inside the classroom. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 23, 141–150.
  • Oxford Dictionary. (2014). Definition of vignette in English [Internet]. Retrieved from www.oxforddictionaries,com/definition/english/vignette
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.10.1037/11168-000
  • Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Qualitative research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ, 311, 42–45.10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42
  • Poulou, M. (2001). The role of vignettes in the research of emotional and behavioural difficulties. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 6, 50–62. doi:10.1080/13632750100507655
  • Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia. (2010). Tenth Malaysia plan 2011–2015. Putrajaya: Author.
  • Prime Minister’s Department/United Nations Country Team, Malaysia. (2011). Malaysia: The millennium development goals at 2010. Kuala Lumpur: United Nations Country Team, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/malaysia/Malaysia-MDGs-Progress-Report-2010.pdf
  • Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569
  • Schön, D. A. (1982). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Singh, P., & Sidhu, G. K. (2010, December). Teaching mathematics and science in English: Looking through the eyes of teachers. Paper presented at the International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Tan, M. (2007, November). Teaching math and science in English in Malaysian schools: Profiles of teacher learning within the context of educational reform. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, Penang, Malaysia.
  • Tigchelaar, A., & Korthagen, F. (2004). Deepening the exchange of student teaching experiences: Implications for the pedagogy of teacher education of recent insights into teacher behaviour. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 665–679.10.1016/j.tate.2004.07.008
  • UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2006). Teachers and educational quality: Monitoring global needs for 2015. Montreal: Author.
  • UNESCO; International Reading Association, IRA. (2008). Status of teacher education in the Asia-Pacific region. Bangkok: UNESCO-APEID Retrieved from www.unescobkk.org/education/apeid/programme-areas/teacher-education-and-training/status-of-teacher-education-in-theasia-pacific-region/
  • van Huizen, P., van Oers, B., & Wubbels, T. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 267–290.10.1080/0022027042000328468
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wareing, M. (2010). Using vignettes to explore work-based learning: Part 1. British Journal of Nursing, 19, 1112–1117.10.12968/bjon.2010.19.17.78560
  • Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72, 131–175.10.3102/00346543072002131

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.