Teachers’ use of knowledge sources in ‘result meetings’: thin data and thick data use.

References

• Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research., 81, 132–169.10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211–244.10.1177/003804070407700302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Practice, 9, 173–206.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2011). Collaboration and contrived collegiality: Revisiting Hargreaves in the age of accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 147–158.10.1007/s10833-011-9154-1
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., Park, V., & Kennedy-Lewis, B. (2012). High school teachers’ use of data to inform instruction. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 17, 247–265.10.1080/10824669.2012.718944
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Flores, M., & Viana, I. (2007). Effects of national policies on teachers’ sense of professionalism: Findings from an empirical study in Portugal and England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30, 249–265.10.1080/02619760701486092
   Google Scholar
• Easley, J., & Tulowitzki, P. (2016). Educational accountability: International perspectives on challenges and possibilities for school leadership. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (2010). Knowledge, working practices, and learning. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning Through Practice (pp. 37–58). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-3939-2
   Google Scholar
• Grimen, H. (2008). Profesjon og kunnskap [Profession and knowledge] In A. Molander & L. I. Terum (Ed.), Profesjonsstudier [Professional studies] (pp. 71–86). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75, 52–74.10.1177/0003122409357044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansen, H., & Mausethagen, S. (2016). Når kunnskap blir styrende: Læreres rekontekstualisering av nye kunnskapsformer. Acta Didactica, 10, 92–107.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, A. C., & Heggen, K. (2015). Child welfare workers use of knowledge in their daily work. European Journal of Social Work, 19, 187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., Gregory, A., Hoppey, D., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). Data literacy: Understanding teachers’ data use in a context of accountability and response to intervention. Action in Teacher Education, 31, 41–55.10.1080/01626620.2009.10463527
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. L. (2012). The effects of accountability system design on teachers’ use of test score data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., & Downey, C. (2012). Professional attitudes to the use of pupil performance data in English secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 415–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Levinsson, M. (2013) Evidens och existens. Evidensbaserad undervisning i ljuset av lärares erfarenheter [Evidence and existence. Evidensbased teaching in the light of teachers’ experiences]. Doktorsavhandling. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118, 143–166.10.1086/663271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S. (2013). Talking about the test. Boundary work in primary school teachers’ interactions around national testing of student performance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 132–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papasotiriou, C., & Hannan, A. (2006). The impact of education research on teaching: The perceptions of Greek primary school teachers. Teacher Development, 10, 361–377.10.1080/13664530600922328
   Google Scholar
• Park, V., Daly, A., & Guerra, A. W. (2012). Strategic framing: How leaders craft the meaning of data use for equity and learning. Educational Policy, 27, 645–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S., Mausethagen, S., & Skedsmo, G. (2017). Investigative modes in research on data use in education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3, 42–55.10.1080/20020317.2017.1326280
   Google Scholar
• Racherbäumer, K., Funke, C., van Ackeren, I., & Clausen, M. (2013). Datennutzung und Schulleitungshandeln an Schulen in weniger begünstigter Lage. Empirische Befunde zu ausgewählten Aspekten der Qualitätsentwicklung. Die Deutsche Schule, 13, 226–254.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J., & Holm, C. (2012). In pursuit of good teacher education: How can research inform policy? Reflecting Education, 8, 62–71.
   Google Scholar
• Reichborn-Kjennerud, K., & Vabø, S. I. (2016). Styring, kontroll og organisasjonslæring [Steering, control and organizational learning]. Nordiske organisasjonsstudier [Nordic Organizational Studies], 18, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22, 413–425.10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., Karbautzki, L., & Vanhoof, J. (2014). Exploring data use practices around Europe: Identifying enablers and barriers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 15–24.10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P., Märtsin, M., & Glasswell, K. (2015). Dilemmatic spaces: High-stakes testing and the possibilities of collaborative knowledge work to generate learning innovations. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 21, 397–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G. (2009). School governing in transition. Perspectives, purposes and perceptions of evaluation policy ( PhD thesis). University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Slagstad, R. (1998). De nasjonale strateger [The national strategists]. Oslo: Pax.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118, 113–141.10.1086/663283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugrue, C., & Mertkan, S. (2016). Professional responsibility, accountability and performativity among teachers: The leavening influence of CPD? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 23, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Przybylski, R., & Johnson, B. J., Educ Asse Eval Acc. (2016). A review of research on teachers’ use of student data: From the perspective of school leadership. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28, 5–33.10.1007/s11092-016-9238-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 245–283.10.1080/00313830600743274
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G. (2000). On translation: From research findings to public utility. Theory Into Practice, 39, 185–190.10.1207/s15430421tip3903_10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., & Gijbels, D. (2012). Changing world: Changing pedagogy. P. Tynjälä, M.-L. Stenström & M. Saarnivaara (Eds.), Transitions and transformations in learning and education, 205–222. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2312-2
   Google Scholar
• Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 519–558.10.3102/0002831207306859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., Jimerson, J. B., & Spikes, D. D. (2012). District-wide effects on data use in the classroom. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, C., Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2015). The contribution of educational research to teachers’ professional learning: Philosophical understandings. Oxford Review of Education, 41, 202–216.10.1080/03054985.2015.1017406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeuli, J. (1994). How do teachers understand research when they read it? Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 39–55.10.1016/0742-051X(94)90039-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar