References
- Barzanò, G., & Grimaldi, E. (2013). Discourses of merit: The hot potato of teacher evaluation in Italy. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 767–791.10.1080/02680939.2013.774439
- Beck, L. G., & Murphy, J. (1993). Understanding the principalship: Metaphorical themes, 1920’s-1990’s. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Campbell, J. W., & Derrington ,M. L. (2017). High-stakes teacher evaluation policy: U.S. principals’ perspectives and variations in practice, Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 24 (3), 1–17, doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1421164.
- Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243-251.10.3102/0013189X16651080
- Flores, M. A. (2004). The impact of school culture and leadership on new teachers’ learning in the workplace. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(4), 297–318.10.1080/1360312042000226918
- Flores, M. A. (2009). Da avaliação de professores: reflexões sobre o caso português [On teacher evaluation: reflections from the Portuguese case]. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluation Educativa, 2(1), 239–246.
- Flores, M. A. (2010). Teacher performance appraisal in Portugal: The (im)possibilities of a contested model. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 15(1), 41–60.
- Flores, M. A. (2012). The implementation of a new policy on teacher appraisal in Portugal: How do teachers experience it at school? Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 351–368.10.1007/s11092-012-9153-7
- Flores, M. A. (2018). Teacher evaluation in Portugal: Persisting challenges and perceived effects. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 24 (3), doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1427017.
- Flores, M. A., & Derrington, M. L. (2017). School principals’ views of teacher evaluation policy: Lessons learned from two empirical studies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(4), 416–431.10.1080/13603124.2015.1094144
- Goldhammer, R., Anderson, R. H., & Krajewski, R. J. (1980). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
- Hoy, W. K., & Forsyth, P. B. (1986). Effective supervision: Theory into practice. New York, NY: Random House.
- Magno, C. S. (2013). Comparative perspectives on international school leadership. New York,NY: Routledge.
- OECD (2009). Evaluating and rewarding the quality of teachers: International practices. Paris: OECD.
- OECD. ( 2013). Teachers for the 21st century: Using evaluation to improve teaching. OECD Publishing.
- Olivia, P. F. (1976). Supervision for today’s schools (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
- Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2018). Teacher evaluation policy as perceived by school principals: The case of Flanders (Belgium). Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 24 (3), 1–14, doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1397508.
- Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2015). The influence of teachers’ expectations on principals’ implementation of a new teacher evaluation policy in Flemish secondary education. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 27(2), 129–151.10.1007/s11092-014-9203-4