Determinants of classroom engagement: a prospective test based on self-determination theory

References

• Archambault, I., & Vandenbossche-Makombo, J. (2014). Validation de l’Échelle des dimensions de l’engagement scolaire (ÉDES) chez les élèves du primaire. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 46(2), 275–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/GstrucMissingRevision.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bonanomi, A., Cantaluppi, G., Nai Ruscone, M., & Osmetti, S. A. (2015). A new estimator of Zumbo’s Ordinal Alpha: A copula approach. Quality and Quantity, 49(3), 941–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer Science.doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Good business: Flow, leadership and the making of meaning. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237-288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Gregory, A., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). The pivotal role of adolescent autonomy in secondary school classrooms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 245–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagenauer, G., Hascher, T., & Volet, S. E. (2015). Teacher emotions in the classroom: Associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline, and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 385–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Adaptación de test para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: Fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. In E. J. Muñiz (Ed.), Psicometría (pp. 67–89). Madrid: Universitas.
   Google Scholar
• Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1175–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, J., Domínguez, E., Núñez, J. L., Pérez, A., & Martín-Albo, J. (2011). Translation and validation of the Spanish version of the Echelle de satisfaction des Besoins psychologiques in academic context. Anales de Psicología, 27, 405–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, J. L., Fernández, C., León, J., & Grijalvo, F. (2015). The relationship between teacher’s autonomy support and students’ autonomy and vitality. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(3), 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, J. L., & León, J. (2015). Autonomy support in the classroom: A review from the self-determination theory. European Psychologist, 20, 275–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, J. L., & León, J. (2018). Testing the relationships between global, contextual, and situational motivation: A longitudinal study of the horizontal, top-down, and bottom-up effects. Revista De Psicodidáctica, 23, 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, J. L., León, J., Grijalvo, F., & Martín-Albo, J. (2012). Measuring autonomy support in university students: The Spanish version of the learning climate questionnaire. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1466–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Predictive validity and reliability of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 579–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding the sociocultural influences on student motivation. In D. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp. 31–59). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 527–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Petegem, S., Beyers, W., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Autonomy in adolescent development. Towards conceptual clarity. In B. Soenens, M. Vansteenkiste, & S. Van Petegem (Eds.), How to solve the conundrum of adolescent autonomy? On the importance of distinguishing between independence and volitional functioning (pp. 1–32). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, L. M., McNeish, D. M., & Yang, J. S. (2016). Multilevel and single-level models for measured and latent variables when data are clustered. Educational Psychologist, 51(3–4), 317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rooij, E. C., Jansen, E. P., & van de Griftdropout, W. J. (2017). Secondary school students’ engagement profiles and their relationship with academic adjustment and achievement in university. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., Chow, A., Hofkens, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). The trajectories of student emotional engagement and school burnout with academic and psychological development: Findings from finnish adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 36, 57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (2016). Robust coefficients alpha and omega and confidence intervals with outlying observations and missing data: Methods and software. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(3), 387–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical, 6(1), 21–29.
   Google Scholar