Barriers to the implementation of specialized reading instruction in secondary co-taught classrooms: an exploratory study

References

• Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers' beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial & Special Education, 22, 245-255. doi:10.1177/074193250102200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkeley, S., & Riccomini, P. J. (2011). QRAC-the-code: A comprehension monitoring strategy for middle school social studies textbooks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 154–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C. (2007). Co-teaching … Not just a textbook term: Implications for practice. Preventing School Failure, 51, 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Brusca-Vega, R., Brown, K., & Yasutake, D. (2011). Science achievement of students in co-taught, inquiry-based classrooms. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Ugel, N., Hamff, A., & Hougen, M. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without reading disabilities in general education middle school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 238–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capin, P., & Vaughn, S. (2017). Improving reading and social studies learning for secondary students with reading disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49, 249–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, L, & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-16. doi:10.17161/fec.v28i3.6852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. C., McDuffie-Landrum, K. A., Oshita, L., & Cook, B. G. (2017). Co-teaching for students with disabilities: A critical and updated analysis of the empirical literature. In J. M. Kauffman, D. P. Hallahan, & P. C. Pullen (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 233–248). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. E. B., Dieker, L., Pearl, C., & Kirkpatrick, R. M. (2012). Planning in the middle: Co-planning between general and special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 22, 208–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embury, C. E., & Dinnesen, M. S. (2012). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms using structured collaborative planning. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching & Learning, 10, 36–52.
   Google Scholar
• Fennick, E., & Liddy, D. (2001). Responsibilities and preparation for collaborative teaching: Co-teachers’ perspectives. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, K. C. (2005). The effects of co-teaching on the achievement of eighth grade students with learning disabilities. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 11, 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M. (2008). Co-teaching: A simple solution that isn’t simple after all. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2, 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Wehby, J., Schumacher, R. F., Gersten, R., & Jordan, N. C. (2015). Inclusion versus specialized intervention for very-low-performing students: What does access mean in an era of academic challenge? Exceptional Children, 81, 134–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgur, H., & Uzuner, Y. (2010). A phenomenological analysis of the views on co-teaching applications in the inclusion classroom. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10, 311–331.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing learning disabilities with UDL and technology: Strategic reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hang, Q, & Rabren, K. (2009). An examination of co-teaching: perspectives and efficacy indicators. Remedial & Special Education, 30, 259-268. doi:10.1177/0741932508321018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U. S. C. 1400 et. seq. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, M. J., Meece, J. L., Byun, S., Farmer, T. W., & Hutchins, B. C. (2011). Relationship of school context to rural youth’s educational achievement and aspirations. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 40, 1225–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isherwood, R., Barger-Anderson, R., Merhaut, J., Badgett, R., & Katsafanas, J. (2011). First year co-teaching: Disclosed through focus group and individual interviews. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Isherwood, R. S., & Barger-Anderson, R. (2008). Factors affecting the adoption of co-teaching models in inclusive classrooms: One school’s journey from mainstreaming to inclusion. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 2, 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, S. (2006). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48, 177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. A, & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldenberg, E. R., Watt, S. J., & Therrien, W. J. (2015). Reading instruction in science for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 160–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe, E. B., & Moore, V. (2004). The challenge of co-teaching in inclusive classrooms at the high school level: What the teachers told us. American Secondary Education, 32, 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A. H., Woodruff, A. L., Klein, C., & Vaughn, S. (2006). Facilitating co-teaching for literacy in general education classrooms through technology: Focus on students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 269–291.
   Google Scholar
• King-Sears, M. E., & Bowman-Kruhm, M. (2010). Attending to specialized reading instruction for adolescents with mild disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(4), 30–40.
   Google Scholar
• King-Sears, M. E., & Bowman-Kruhm, M. (2011). Specialized reading instruction for adolescents with learning disabilities: What special education co-teachers say. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 172–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King-Sears, M. E., Brawand, A. E., Jenkins, M., & Preston-Smith, S. (2014). Co-teaching perspectives from secondary science co-teachers and their students with disabilities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 651–680.
   Google Scholar
• Kuder, S. J. (2017). Vocabulary instruction for secondary students with reading disabilities: An updated research review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. E., Thompson, S. A., & Timmons, V. (2016). We are inclusive. We are a team. Let’s just do it: Commitment, collective efficacy, and agency in four inclusive schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 889–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makinen, M. (2013). Becoming engaged in inclusive practices: Narrative reflections on teaching as descriptors of teachers’ work engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmgren, K. W., & Trezek, B. J. (2009). Literacy instruction for secondary students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41(6), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. L. (2011). Educational programs for elementary students with learning disabilities: Can they be both effective and inclusive? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski, W. W. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: How can we improve? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Murawski, W. W., & Hughes, C. E. (2009). Response to intervention, collaboration, and co-teaching: A logical combination for successful systemic change. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 53, 267–277.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus Version 8 user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nagle, K. M., Hernandez, G., Embler, S., McLaughlin, M. J., & Doh, F. (2006). Characteristics of effective rural elementary schools for students with disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 25(3), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2015). The nation’s report card: Reading 2015 Grades 4 and 8. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2016). The nation’s report card: Reading 2015 Grade 12. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigol, G. W., & Ziemnicki, C. (2010). E-mail trends in the education market 2010: A comprehensive analysis of the 2008–2009 school year. Shelton, CT: Market Data Retrieval.
   Google Scholar
• Rimpola, R. C. (2014). Collaborative planning and teacher efficacy of high school mathematics co-teachers. Educational Planning, 21, 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, E. A., McMahon, S. D., & Keys, C. B. (2014). Collaborative teaching: School implementation and connections with outcomes among students with disabilities. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 42, 72–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaffer, L., & Thomas-Brown, K. (2015). Enhancing teacher competency through co-teaching and embedded professional development. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3, 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, M., Lee, H., & McKenna, J. W. (2016). Special education and general education preservice teachers’ co-teaching experiences: A comparative synthesis of qualitative research. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanidis, A., & Strogilos, V. (2015). Union gives strength: Mainstream and special education teachers’ responsibilities in inclusive co-taught classrooms. Educational Studies, 41, 393–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striker, T., Gillis, B., & Zong, G. (2013). Improving pre-service middle school teachers’ confidence, competence, and commitment to co-teaching in inclusive classrooms. Teacher Education Quarterly, 40, 159–180.
   Google Scholar
• Strogilos, V., & Stefanidis, A. (2015). Contextual antecedents of co-teaching efficacy: Their influence on students with disabilities’ learning progress, social participation and behaviour improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 218–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strogilos, V., Stefanidis, A., & Tragoulia, E. (2016). Co-teachers’ attitudes towards planning and instructional activities for students with disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31, 344–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strogilos, V., Tragoulia, E., Avramidis, E., Voulagka, A., & Papanikolaou, V. (2017). Understanding the development of differentiated instruction for students with and without disabilities in co-taught classrooms. Disability & Society, 32, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, E., Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Fall, A. M. (2015). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge among middle school students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 8, 426–442.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. F, Surface, E. A, Martin, D. L, & Sanders, M. G. (2003). From paper to pixels: moving personnel surveys to the web. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 197-227. doi:10.1111/peps.2003.56.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trent, S. C., Driver, B. L., & Wood, M. H. (2003). Creating and sustaining a special education/general education partnership: A story of change and uncertainty. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Office of special education and rehabilitative services. 39th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, D.C.: Office of Special Education Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hover, S., Hicks, D., & Sayeski, K. (2012). A case study of co-teaching in an inclusive secondary high-stakes World History I classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40, 260–291.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Wanzek, J. (2014). Intensive interventions in reading for students with reading disabilities: Meaningful impacts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Leroux, A., Roberts, G., Denton, C., Barth, A., & Fletcher, J. (2012). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 515–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, J., Kearns, D. M., Lemons, C. J., Mitchell, M., Clancy, E., Davidson, K. A., … Wei, Y. (2018). Reading comprehension and co-teaching practices in middle school English language arts classrooms. Exceptional Children, 84, 384–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigent, C. A. (2013). High school readers: A profile of above average readers and readers with learning disabilities reading expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 134–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. L., Kim, S. A., & Michaels, C. A. (2013). Factors associated with where secondary students with disabilities are educated and how they are doing. Journal of Special Education, 47, 14–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. L, Kim, S. A, & Michaels, C. A. (2013). Factors associated with where secondary students with disabilities are educated and how they are doing. Journal Of Special Education, 47, 148-161. doi: 10.1177/0022466911411575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. L, & Michaels, C. A. (2006). General and special education students' perceptions of co-teaching: implications for secondary-level literacy instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 205-225. doi: 10.1080/10573560500455695
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond, N. (2006). Reading and writing in co-taught secondary school social studies classrooms: A reality check. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 249–268.
   Google Scholar