References
- Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
- Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.008
- Contreras, R. B. (2011). Examining the context in qualitative analysis: The role of the co-occurrence tool in ATLAS.ti. ATLAS.ti Newsletter, 2011(2), 5–6. http://downloads.atlasti.com/library/contreras_nl201108.pdf
- Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Christopher-Gordon.
- Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947
- Deussen, T., Coskie, T., Robinson, L., & Autio, E. (2007). “Coach” can mean many things: Five categories of literacy coaches in reading first (issues & answers. report, REL 2007-no. 005). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest.
- Friese, S. (2015). ATLAS.ti 7 user guide and reference. (No. 231.20151022). ATLAS.ti GmbH.
- Gallucci, C., Van Lare, M. D., Yoon, I. H., & Boatright, B. (2010). Instructional coaching: Building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 919–963. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210371497
- Garman, N. B. (1990). Theories embedded in the events of clinical supervision: A hermeneutic approach. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(3), 201–213.
- Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). SuperVision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th edition). Pearson.
- González, G., Deal, J. T., & Skultety, L. (2016). Facilitating teacher learning when using different representations of practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(5), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116669573
- Hargreaves, A., & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: Contrived collegiality, collaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(90)90015-W
- Heineke, S. F. (2013). Coaching discourse: Supporting teachers’ professional learning. The Elementary School Journal, 113(3), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1086/668767
- Helms-Lorenz, M., van de Grift, W., Canrinus, E., Maulana, R., & van Veen, K. (2018). Evaluation of the behavioral and affective outcomes of novice teachers working in professional development schools versus non-professional development schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.10.006
- Helms-Lorenz, M., van de Grift, W., & Maulana, R. (2016). Longitudinal effects of induction on teaching skills and attrition rates of beginning teachers. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(2), 178–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1035731
- Ippolito, J. (2010). Three ways that literacy coaches balance responsive and directive relationships with teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 164–190. https://doi.org/10.1086/653474
- Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10390804
- Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
- Kroeze, C. J. A. (2014). Georganiseerde begeleiding bij opleiden in de school: Een onderzoek naar het begeleiden van werkplekleren van leraren in opleiding [Arranged mentoring in school-based teacher education. A study of mentoring student teacher’s workplace learning] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tilburg University.
- Kuusisaari, H. (2014). Teachers at the zone of proximal development – Collaboration promoting or hindering the development process. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.06.001
- Linder, S. M. (2011). The facilitator’s role in elementary mathematics professional development. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(2), 44–66. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/41/156
- Mangin, M. M., & Dunsmore, K. (2015). How the framing of instructional coaching as a lever for systemic or individual reform influences the enactment of coaching. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(2), 179–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X14522814
- Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Van de Grift, W. (2015). Development and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring pre-service teachers’ teaching behaviour: A Rasch modelling approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.939198
- Nachlieli, T. (2011). Co-facilitation of study groups around animated scenes: The discourse of a moderator and a researcher. ZDM, 43(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0305-2
- Neuman, S. B., & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 532–566. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208328088
- Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
- Poglinco, S. M., & Bach, A. J. (2004). The heart of the matter: Coaching as a vehicle for professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(5), 398–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408500514
- Sailors, M., & Price, L. (2015). Support for the improvement of practices through intensive coaching (SIPIC): A model of coaching for improving reading instruction and reading achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.008
- Simons, L., Lathlean, J., & Squire, C. (2008). Shifting the focus: Sequential methods of analysis with qualitative data. Qualitative Health Research, 18(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307310264
- Van de Grift, W., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2014). Teaching skills of student teachers: Calibration of an evaluation instrument and its value in predicting student academic engagement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.09.003
- Van der Lans, R. M., van de Grift, W., & van Veen, K. (2018). Developing an instrument for teacher feedback: Using the Rasch model to explore teachers’ development of effective teaching strategies and behaviors. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1268086
- Van Es, E. A., Tunney, J., Goldsmith, L. T., & Seago, N. (2014). A framework for the facilitation of teachers’ analysis of video. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114534266
- Veenman, S., & Denessen, E. (2001). The coaching of teachers: Results of five training studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(4), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.7.4.385.8936
- Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T. C. M., & Bolhuis, S. (2007). Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600601152520