Supporting elementary school children to engage in collaborative argumentation: developing a kaleidoscope framework of inquiry dialogue

References

• Archer, M. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity.. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. (2018). On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 353–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Clark, D. B. (2013). Learning through collaborative argumentation. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver (Ed.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 314–332). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Duncan, R. G., & Rinehart, R. W. (2018). Epistemic design: Design to promote transferable epistemic growth in the PRACCIS project. In E. Manalo, Y. Uesaka, & C. A. Chinn (Eds.), Promoting spontaneous use of learning and reasoning strategies: Theory, research, and practice for effective transfer. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition & evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical & applied perspectives from cognitive science & the educational sciences (pp. 425–453). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, R., Chinn, C., & Barzilai, S. (2018). Grasp of evidence: Problematizing and expanding the next generation science standards’ conceptualization of evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 00, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21468
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, M. (2007). A framework for facilitating classroom dialogue. Teaching Philosophy, 30(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil200730141
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15569530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of Inquiry-based learning. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn Brownlee, J., Ferguson, L., & Ryan, M. (2017). Changing teachers‘ epistemic cognition: A new conceptual framework for epistemic reflexivity. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1333430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn Brownlee, J., Johansson, E., Walker, S., & Scholes, L. (2017). Teaching for active citizenship: Personal epistemology and practices in early education classrooms. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, J., Walker, S., Johansson, E., Scholes, L., & Ryan, M. (2018). Epistemic climates for active citizenship: Dialogically organised classrooms and children’s internal dialogue. In E. Johansson, A. Emilson, & A. Puroila (Eds.), Values education in early childhood settings: Concepts, approaches and practices (pp. 9–88). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M. (2002). Scaffolding argumentation in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 93(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990209599887
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Education 2030: The future of education and skills.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., Dong, T., Li, Y., Kim, I.-H., & Kim, S.-Y. (2008). Learning to think well: Application of argument schema theory. In C. C. Block & S. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 196–213). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. (2017). The most reasonable answer. Helping students build better arguments together. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., Bourke, T., Lunn, J., Rowan, L., Walker, S., & Churchward, P. (2018). Seeking a reflexive space for teaching to and about diversity: Emergent properties of enablement and constraint for teacher educators. Teachers and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1542298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. M., Wartenberg, T. E., & Winner, E. (2013). Engagement in philosophical dialogue facilitates children’s reasoning about subjectivity. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1338–1347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I., Reznitskaya, A., Bourdage, K., Oyler, J., Glina, M., Drewry, R., Kim, M., & Nelson, K. (2017). Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: Changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. Language and Education, 31(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar