References
- Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2), 85–125. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349
- Hamilton, M. (2018). Pedagogical transitions among science teachers: How does context intersect with teacher beliefs? Teachers and Teaching, 24(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1367658
- Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.991099
- Baker, P. J. (2011). Three configurations of school-university partnerships: An exploratory study. Planning and Changing, 42(1/2), 41–62 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ952392.pdf.
- Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Open University Press.
- Baumfield, V., & Butterworth, M. (2007). Creating and translating knowledge about teaching and learning in collaborative school–university research partnerships: An analysis of what is exchanged across the partnerships, by whom and how. Teachers and Teaching, 13(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701391960
- Bruce-Davis, M. N., Gubbins, E. J., Gilson, C. M., Villanueva, M., Foreman, J. L., & Rubenstein, L. D. (2014). STEM high school administrators’, teachers’, and students’ perceptions of curricular and instructional strategies and practices. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 272–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14527952
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
- Commonwealth of Australia. (2015). National innovation and science agenda. Australian Government. Canberra. https://www.industry.gov.au/sites/default/files/July%202018/document/pdf/national-innovation-and-science-agenda-report.pdf?acsf_files_redirect
- Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3 ed.). Sage.
- Department of Education and Science (DES). (1999). The primary school curriculum. Government of Ireland. Dublin. https://www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/c4a88a62-7818-4bb2-bb18-4c4ad37bc255/PSEC_Introduction-to-Primary-Curriculum_Eng.pdf
- Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2017). STEM education policy statement 2017–2026. Government of Ireland. Dublin. https://www.education.ie/en/The-Education-System/STEM-Education-Policy/stem-education-policy-statement-2017-2026-.pdf
- Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Towards better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
- Fisler, J., & Firestone, W. (2006). Teacher learning in a school-university partnership: Exploring the role of social trust and teaching efficacy beliefs. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1155–1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00689.x
- Foster, K. M., Bergin, K. B., McKenna, A. F., Millard, D. L., Perez, L. C., Prival, J. T., Rainey, D. Y., Sevian, V. H. M., Putten, E. A., & Hamos, J. E. (2010). Partnerships for STEM education. Science, 329(5994), 906–907. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1191040
- Gardner, D. C. (2011). Characteristic collaborative processes in school-university partnerships. Planning and Changing, 42(1/2), 63–86. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ952393.pdf
- Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
- Holstein, K. A., & Keene, K. A. (2013). The complexities and challenges associated with the implementation of a STEM curriculum. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(4), 616–636. https://journals.rowman.com
- House of Commons. (2018). Delivering STEM skills for the economy: Forty-seventh report of session 2017–19. Committee of Public Accounts. House of Commons, London. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubacc/691/691.pdf
- Huberman, M., & Miles, B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769–802). Sage.
- Kershner, R., Pedder, D., & Doddington, C. (2013). Professional learning during a schools–university partnership Master of Education course: Teachers’ perspectives of their learning experiences. Teachers and Teaching, 19(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.744197
- Lehman, J. D., Kim, W., & Harris, C. (2014). Collaborations in a community of practice working to integrate engineering design in elementary science education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 15(3), 21–28. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1901/1622
- Lesseig, K., Slavit, D., Nelson, T. H., & Seidel, R. A. (2016). Supporting middle school teachers’ implementation of STEM design challenges. School Science and Mathematics, 116(4), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12172
- Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
- Mattessich, P. W., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. R. (2001). Collaboration: What makes it work: A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration (2 ed.). Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
- McNiff, J. (1992). Action research: Principles and practice. Routledge.
- Moyer-Packenham, P., Kitsantas, A., Bolyard, J., Huie, F., & Irby, N. (2009). Participation by STEM faculty in mathematics and science partnership activities for teachers. Journal of STEM Education, 10(3–4), 1–20. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/173851/.
- Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667014
- National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). (2020). Draft primary curriculum framework. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Department of Education, Government of Ireland. Dublin. https://ncca.ie/media/4456/ncca-primary-curriculum-framework-2020.pdf
- Park, M., Dimitrov, D. M., Patterson, L. G., & Park, D. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ beliefs about readiness for teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15614040
- Royal Academy of Engineering. (2016). The UK STEM education landscape: A report for the Lloyd’s register foundation from the royal academy of engineering education and skills committee. Royal Academy of Engineering, London. https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/uk-stem-education-landscape
- Smith, K. L., Rayfield, J., & McKim, B. R. (2015). Effective practices in STEM integration: Describing teacher perceptions and instructional method use. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(4), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04183
- Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
- Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636
- Zhang, X., McInerney, J., & Frechtling, J. (2011). Effect of STEM faculty engagement in the math and science partnership program. School Science and Mathematics, 111(6), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00088.x