References
- Alterator, S., & Deed, C. (2013). Teacher adaptation to open learning spaces. Issues in Educational Research, 23(3), 215–330.
- Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., Brooks, C. D., Saichaie, K., & Petersen, C. I. (2016). A guide to teaching in the active learning classroom: History, research and practice. Stylus Publishing.
- Benade, L. (2017). Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 796–807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1269631
- Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Waddington, D. I., & Pickup, D. I. (2019). Twenty-first century adaptive teaching and individualized learning operationalized as specific blends of student-centred instructional events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1–2), 1–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1017
- Bøjer, B. (2019). Unlocking Learning Spaces: An examination of the interplay between the design of learning spaces and pedagogical practices. KADK: The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation.
- Bradbeer, C., Mahat, M., Byers, T., & Imms, W. (2019). A systematic review of the effects of innovative learning environments on teacher mind frames. Technical Report 5/2019, University of Melbourne. http://www.iletc.com.au/publications/reportsReewofacherMind
- Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Evaluating teacher and student spatial transition from a traditional classroom to an innovative learning environment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 156–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.004
- Campbell, M., Saltmarsh, S., Chapman, A., & Drew, C. (2013). Issues of teacher professional learning within ‘non-traditional’ classroom environments. Improving Schools, 16(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213501057
- Cardellino, P., & Woolner, P. (2019). Designing for transformation: A case study of open learning spaces and educational change. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28(3), 383–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1649297
- Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018). Framing learning entanglement in innovative learning spaces: Connecting theory, design and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1120–1137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3483
- Consuegra, E., Engels, N., & Willegems, V. (2016). Using video-stimulated recall to investigate teacher awareness of explicit and implicit gendered thoughts on classroom interactions. Teachers and Teaching, 22(6), 683–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1158958
- Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2nd ed.). SAGE.
- Daniels, H., Tse, H. M., Stables, A., & Cox, S. (2017). Design as a social practice: The design of new build schools. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 767–787. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1360176
- Deed, C., & Lesko, T. (2015). ‘Unwalling’ the classroom: Teacher reaction and adaptation. Learning Environments Research, 18(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9181-6
- Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2014.882376
- Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Routledge.
- Fletcher, J., Mackey, J., & Fickel, L. (2017). A New Zealand case study: What is happening to lead changes to effective co-teaching in flexible learning spaces? Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 32(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2017-007
- French, R., Imms, W., & Mahat, M. (2020). Case studies on the transition from traditional classrooms to innovative learning environments: Emerging strategies for success. Improving Schools, 23(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219894408
- Gislason, N. (2010). Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environments Research, 13(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9071-x
- Helgevold, N. (2016). Teaching as creating space for participation: Establishing a learning community in diverse classrooms. Teachers and Teaching, 22(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1058590
- Holmberg, J. (2019). Designing for added pedagogical value: A design-based research study of teachers’ educational design with ICT. Stockholm University.
- Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowiz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning, 174–202. Cambridge University Press.
- Klette, K. (2007). Trends in research on teaching and learning in schools: Didactics meets classroom studies. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.147
- Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or the love of technology. MIT Press.
- Lockton, M., & Fargason, S. (2019). Disrupting the status quo: How teachers grapple with reforms that compete with long-standing educational views. Journal of Educational Change, 20(4), 469–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09351-5
- Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(4), 575–595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128
- Niemi, K. (2020). ‘The best guess for the future?’ Teachers’ adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 282–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1816371
- OECD. (2013) . Innovative Learning Environments.
- OECD. (2017). The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264277274-en
- Priestly, M. (2011). Schools, teachers, and curriculum change: A balancing act? Journal of Educational Change, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-010-9140-z
- Saltmarsh, S., Chapman, A., Campbell, M., & Drew, C. (2015). Putting “structure within the space”: Spatially un/responsive pedagogic practices in open-plan learning environments. Educational Review, 67(3), 315–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2014.924482
- Sigurðardóttir, A. K., & Hjartarson, T. (2016). The idea and reality of an innovative school: From inventive design to established practice in a new school building. Improving Schools, 19(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480215612173
- Sigurðardóttir, A. K., & Hjartarson, T. (2018). Design features of Icelandic school buildings: How do they reflect changes in educational governance and daily school practice? In I. Grosvenor & L. Rosén Rasmussen (Eds.), Making education: Material school design and educational governance,71–94. Springer.
- Stadler-Altmann, U. (Ed.). (2016). Lernumgebungen. Erziehungswissenschaftliche und architekturkritische Perspektiven auf Schulgebäude und Klassenzimmer. [Learning environment. educational and architectural views on school buildings and classrooms]. Barbara Budrich [bilingual publication].
- Stadler-Altmann, U. (2018). Designing educational and learning space: Transforming processes of schools and classrooms– Menntakvika. University of Iceland. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28137.95849
- Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good research practice. Vetenskapsrådet.
- Tam, A. C. F. (2015). The role of a professional learning community in teacher change: A perspective from beliefs and practices. Teachers and Teaching, 21(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928122
- van der Heijden, H. R. M. A., Geldens, J. J. M., Beijaard, D., & Popeijus, H. L. (2015). Characteristics of teachers as change agents. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 681–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044328
- Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., McKenney, S., Cullinan, D., & Heuer, J. (2017). Aligning pedagogy with physical learning spaces. European Journal of Education, 52(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12225
- Vygotski, L. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
- Woodman, K. (2016). Re-placing flexibility: Flexibility in learning spaces and learning. In I. Fisher (Ed.), The translational design of schools (pp. 51–82). Sense Publishers.
- Woolner, P. (2010). The design of learning space. Continuum.
- Woolner, P., Clark, J., Laing, K., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2014). A school tries to change: How leaders and teachers understand change to space and practices in a UK secondary school. Improving Schools, 17(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480214537931
- Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice? Improving Schools, 15(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480211434796
- Woolner, P., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2018). Structural change from physical foundations: The role of the environment in enacting school change. Journal of Educational Change, 19, 223–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9317-4
- Yeoman, P. (2018). The material correspondence of learning. In R. A. Ellis & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Spaces of teaching and learning, 81–103. Springer.