References
- Aseeri, M. (2015). The reality of professional development of mathematics and science teachers at elementary schools in Najran, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(23), 86–98. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079034.pdf
- Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2018). Foundation to year 10 curriculum. Retrieved September 14, 2021, from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/
- Banks, J. A. (Ed.). (2017). Citizenship education and global migration: Implications for theory, research, and teaching. American Educational Research Association.
- Belford, N., Tudball, E., & Kewalramani, S. (2020). Research-informed ‘immersive’ professional learning with pre-service teachers in schools. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1733223
- Charmaz, K. (2003). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 311–330). Sage.
- Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065006
- Christian, K. B., Kelly, A. M., & Bugallo, M. F. (2021). NGSS-based teacher professional development to implement engineering practices in STEM instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00284-1
- Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
- Cooper, R., Fitzgerald, A., Loughran, J., Phillips, M., & Smith, K. (2020). Understanding teachers’ professional learning needs: What does it mean to teachers and how can it be supported? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 26(7–8), 558–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1900810
- Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
- El-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., & Alhammad, K. (2017). Context of STEM integration in schools: Views from in-service science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2459–2484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01235a
- Gall, M., Gall, J., & Borg, W. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. Pearson.
- Gorodetsky, M., & Barak, G. (2016). Becoming learners/teachers in nomadic space. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1023030
- Grau, V., Calcagni, E., Preiss, D. D., & Ortiz, D. (2017). Teachers’ professional development through university-school partnerships: Theoretical standpoints and evidence from two pilot studies in Chile. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1102867
- Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
- Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Corwin Press.
- Johnson, R. K., & Swain, M. (1997). Immersion education: International perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
- Kanematsu, H., & Barry, D. M. (2015). STEM and ICT education in intelligent environments. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19234-5
- Kayi-Aydar, H., & Goering, C. Z. (2019). Socratic circles in professional development sessions: Negotiating peripheral participation and membership in building a community of practice. Action in Teacher Education, 41(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1561547
- Kennedy, A. (2014). Understanding continuing professional development: The need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional Development in Education, 40(5), 688–697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.955122
- King, F. (2014). Evaluating the impact of teacher professional development: An evidence-based framework. Professional Development in Education, 40(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.823099
- Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2020). Vision 2030 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. https://vision2030.gov.sa/en
- Klatt, G., Berry, A., Suryani, A., Volkoff, V., & Khadawardi, H. (2020). Investigation of Saudi teachers’ perceptions of teaching and learning after a 12-month professional development programme in Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(7), 15–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n7.2
- Korthagen, F. (2009). Professional learning from within. Studying Teacher Education, 5(2), 195–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960903306955
- Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
- Mahn, H. (2012). International journal of educational psychologyVygotsky’s analysis of children’s meaning making processes. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(2), 100–126. https://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/ijep/article/view/289/258
- McChesney, K., & Aldridge, J. M. (2019). What gets in the way? A new conceptual model for the trajectory from teacher professional development to impact. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 834–852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1667412
- Nielsen, B. (2012). Science teachers’ meaning-making when involved in a school-based professional development project. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(6), 621–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9300-5
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework mathematics, reading, science and problem-solving knowledge and skills. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/14/33694881.pdf
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en
- Piqueras, J., & Achiam, M. (2019). Science museum educators’ professional growth: Dynamics of changes in research–practitioner collaboration. Science Education, 103(2), 389–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21495
- Roth, M.-W., & Lee, Y. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural–historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273
- Sabah, S., Fayez, F., Al-Shamrani, S., & Mansour, N. (2014). Continuing professional development (CPD) provision for science and mathematics teachers in Saudi Arabia: Perceptions and experiences of CPD providers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/14.13.91
- Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Siekmann, G., & Korbel, P. (2016). Defining “STEM” skills: Review and synthesis of the literature. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER). https://www.ncver.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/61339/Support-doc-1-Defining-STEM-skills-review-and-synthesisof-the-literature.pdf
- Smith, K., & Loughran, J. (2017). Quality learning: Teachers changing their practice. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-914-0
- Stringer, E. T. (1999). Action research (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Sugrue, C. (2004). Rhetorics and realities of CPD across Europe. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 67–93). Open University Press.
- Tichnor-Wagner, A. (2019). Globally-minded leadership: A new approach for leading schools in diverse democracies. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 15(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2019v15n2a869
- Timms, M. J., Moyle, K., Weldon, P. R., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools: Literature and policy review. Australian Council for Educational Research.
- Vetter, A., & Schieble, M. (2019). Using tensions during critical conversations about race in English education. In H. Hallman, K. Pastore-Capuana, & D. Pasternak (Eds.), Using tension as a resource: New visions in teaching the English language arts methods class (pp. 37–52). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Xu, L., Campbell, C., & Hobbs, L. (2019). Changing STEM and entrepreneurial thinking teaching practices and pedagogy through a professional learning program. In H. Ying-Shao & Y. Yi-Fen (Eds.), Asia-Pacific STEM teaching practices: From theoretical frameworks to practices (pp. 139–156). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0768-7_9
- Zeng, Y., & Day, C. (2019). Collaborative teacher professional development in schools in England (UK) and Shanghai (China): Cultures, contexts and tensions. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 25(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1593822