Interest over knowledge: A Jewish-Arab comparison of teachers’ willingness to conduct CPI discussions

References

• Al-Haj, M. (1995). Education, empowerment, and control: The case of the Arabs in Israel. Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Haj, M. (2002). Multiculturalism in deeply divided societies: The Israeli case. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(2), 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boudon, R. (1989). Subjective rationality and the explanation of social behavior. Rationality and Society, 1(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463189001002002
   Google Scholar
• Central Bureau of Statistics. (2019). Society in Israel – gaps between centre and periphery (Vol. 46).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (2018). Walking Fearlessly on a Tightrope: Controversy Work of Civic Teachers – The Israeli Case [ Unpublished thesis]. Hebrew University. (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Comte, A. (1855). The positive philosophy of Auguste comte. C. Blanchard.‏.
   Google Scholar
• Dover, A. G., Henning, N., & Agarwal-Rangnath, R. (2016). Reclaiming agency: Justice-oriented social studies teachers respond to changing curricular standards. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 457–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlich-Ron, R., & Gindi, S. (2017). Politics in the classroom? Teacher avoidance of controversial discourse around Jewish Arab relations. Zman Hinuch, 3( Hebrew), 9–33.
   Google Scholar
• Erlich-Ron, R., & Gindi, S. (2018). Are civics teachers different from teachers of other disciplines in their handling of controversial issues?. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(2), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faragó, L., Kende, A., & Krekó, P. (2020). We only believe in news that we doctored ourselves: The connection between partisanship and political fake news. Social Psychology, 51(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, B. (2019). Patriotism, pressure, and place: Civic agency in base country. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2019.1553584
   Google Scholar
• Gindi, S., & Erlich Ron, R. (2019). Bargaining with the system: A mixed-methods study of Arab teachers in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 69, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gindi, S., & Erlich-Ron, R. (2021). Minority-Teacher Group Differences in Attitudes toward Controversial Political Issues / Acuse de recibo de Minority-Teacher Group Differences in Attitudes toward Controversial Political Issues. Cultura Y Educación/Culture and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2021.1949112
   Google Scholar
• Gindi, S., Sagee, R., & Gilat, Y. (2021). Who wants a political classroom? Attitudes toward teaching controversial political issues in school. Journal of Social Science Education, 20(2), 130–150.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (1998). Critical pedagogy as performative practice: Memories of whiteness. In C. A. Torres & T. R. Mitchell (Eds.), Sociology of education: Emerging perspectives (pp. 143–153). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, T. I., & Savenije, G. M. (2018). Teaching controversial historical issues. In S. A. Metzger & L. McArthur Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 503–526). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Halabi, R. (2021). Civics curriculum in Arab schools: Teachers facing ethical and ideological dilemmas in the classroom. The Curriculum Journal, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/curj.137
   Google Scholar
• Harpaz, Y. (2005). Teaching and learning in a community of thinking. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 20(2), 136–157. https://yoramharpaz.com/pubs/en_learning/teaching-learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, Y. H. (2020). Exploration of teachers’ personal practical knowledge for teaching controversial public issues in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(3), 281–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2016). Teacher political disclosure as parrhēsia. Teachers College Record, 118(5), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap’: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (2002). Education for gender equality in educational institutions. https://cms.education.gov.il/educationcms/applications/mankal/arc/sc4dk9_4_4.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (2009). Education for sustainable development. https://cms.education.gov.il/educationcms/applications/mankal/etsmedorim/9/9-4/hodaotvmeyda/h-2011-5-9-4-9.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (2015a). Consumer fairness – A multi-age curriculum. https://apps.education.gov.il/Mankal/Horaa.aspx?siduri=59
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (2015b). Tolerance for the prevention of racism and cohabitation. https://pop.education.gov.il/headquarters-civil-education-coexistence/tolerance-prevention-racism/
   Google Scholar
• Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A. (2017). Language teachers’ evaluation of curriculum change: A qualitative study. Qualitative Report, 22(2), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society. Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2012). Democracy, diversity, and schooling. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), The Encyclopaedia of diversity in education (pp. 1–10). Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, K. (2010). Being wrong: Adventures in the margin of error. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Swalwell, K., & Schweber, S. (2016). Teaching through turmoil: Social studies teachers and local controversial current events. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(3), 283–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1201447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannebaum, R. P. (2013). Dialogue, discussion, and democracy in the social studies classroom. Social Studies Research & Practice, 8(3), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2013-B0007
   Google Scholar
• Gindi, S., & Erlich-Ron, R. (2018). High school teachers' attitudes and reported behaviors towards controversial issues. Teaching and teacher education, 70, 58-66.
   Google Scholar
• Tichy, M., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Roseth, C. J. (2010). The impact of constructive controversy on moral development. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 765–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (2015). Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in Social Psychology (pp. 49–72). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weeden, K., & Bright, D. (2020). Pre-service teacher attitudes towards discussing terrorism in English as an additional language (EAL) classrooms: Citizenship, democratic practices, and the discussion of controversial issues. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00333-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K. L., Lee, C. K. J., Chan, K. S. J., & Kennedy, K. J. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy in cultivating students to become ‘good citizens’: A Hong Kong case. Teacher Development, 23(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1550435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar