References
- Adams, P., Mombourquette, C., Brandon, J., Hunter, D., Friesen, S., Kok, K., Parsons, D., & Stelmach, B. (2018). A study of teacher growth, supervision, and evaluation in Alberta: Policy and perception. Journal of Educational Supervision, 1(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.1.2.1
- Arredondo Rucinski, D. (2016). Real world professional learning communities: Their use and effects. Rowman and Littlefield.
- Barnette, J., & Thompson, J. (1979). A descriptive assessment of the effect of e valuations on instruction. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 5(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(79)90008-7
- Berliner, D. (2018). Between Scylla and Charybdis: Reflections on and problems associated with the evaluation of teachers in an era of metrification. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(54), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3820
- Bleiberg, J., Brunner, E., Harbatkin, E., Kraft, M., & Springer, M. (2021, December). The effect of teacher evaluation on achievement and attainment: Evidence from statewide reforms. (EdWorkingPaper: 21-496) Annenberg Institute. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai21-496
- Brandon, J., Hollweck, T., Donlevy, K., & Whalen, C. (2018). Teacher supervision and evaluation challenges: Canadian perspectives on overall instructional leadership. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1425678
- Cherasaro, T., Brodersen, R., Reale, M., Yanoski, D., & Marzano. Research. (2016, November). Teachers’ responses to feedback from evaluators: What feedback characteristics matter? Institute of Education Sciences, national Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/central/
- Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
- Cohen, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2016). Building a more complete understanding of teacher evaluation using classroom observations. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16659442
- Curry, V. (2021, May 26). A CIO’s strategies for humanizing data. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/cios-strategies-humanizing-data
- Danielson, C. (2016, April 18). Charlotte Danielson on rethinking teacher evaluation. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinion-charlotte-danielson-on-rethinking-teacher-evaluation/2016/04
- Darling Hammond, L., Chung Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009, February). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council and The School Redesign Network. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/professional-learning-learning-profession-status-report-teacher-development-us-and-abroad.pdf
- Donaldson, M. L. (2009). So long, lake wobegon? Using teacher evaluation to raise teacher quality. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/so-long-lake-wobegon/
- Donaldson, M. L. (2011, February). Principals’ approaches to developing teacher quality: Constraints and opportunities in hiring, assigning, evaluation, and developing teachers. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/reports/2011/02/23/9161/principals-approaches-to-developing-teacher-quality/
- Donaldson, M. (2021). Multidisciplinary perspectives on teacher evaluation: Understanding the research and theory. Routledge.
- Firestone, W., & Donaldson, M. (2019). Teacher evaluation as data use: What recent research suggestions. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31(3), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019-09300-z
- Flores, M. (2012). The implementation of a new policy on teacher appraisal in Portugal: How do teachers experience it at school? Educational Assessment, Evaluation Accountability, 24(4), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-012-9153-7
- Flores, M., & Derrington, M. L. (2018). Improving teacher evaluation: Key issues for appraisers in a globalized era. Teachers and Teaching; Theory and Practice, 24(3), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1427017
- Flores, M. (2018). Teacher evaluation in Portugal: Persisting challenges and perceived effects. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(3), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1425677
- Garet, M., Wayne, A., Brown, S., Ricklees, J., Song, M., & Manzeske, D. (2017). Impact of providing performance feedback to teachers and principals. Institute of Education Sciences. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578873.pdf
- Garrison Wilhelm, A., Cobb, P., Frank, K., & I-Chen, C. (2018). Teachers’ advice networks. In P. Cobb, K. Jackson, E. Henrick, & T. Smith, the MIST Team (Eds.), Systems for instructional improvement: Creating coherence from the classroom to the district office (pp. 135–148). Harvard Education Press.
- Glanz, J., & Hazi, H. M. (2019). Shedding light on the phenomenon of supervision traveling incognito: A field’s struggles for visibility. Journal of Educational Supervision, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.2.1.1
- Goldring, E., Clark, M., Rubin, M., Rogers, L., Grissom, J., Gill, B., Kautz, T., McCullough, M., Neel, M., & Burnett, A. (2020, July). Changing the principal supervisor role to better support principals: Evidence from the principal supervisor initiative. Mathematica/Vanderbilt University. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Changing-the-Principal-Supervisor-Role.pdf
- Grissom, J., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13510020
- Guskey, T. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015005005
- Hallinger, P., Heck, R., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9179-5
- Hattie, J. (2012). Feedback in schools. In R. Sutton, M. Hornsey, & K. Douglas (Eds.), Feedback: The communication of praise, criticism, and advice (pp. 265–277). Peter Lang.
- Hazi, H. M. (1994). The teacher evaluation-supervision dilemma: A case of entanglements and irreconcilable differences. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(2), 195–216.
- Hazi, H. M. (2019). Coming to understand the wicked problem of teacher evaluation. In S. J. Zepeda & J. Ponticell (Eds.), Handbook of educational supervision (pp. 183–207). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Hazi, H. M. (2020). Instructional improvement: A modest essay. Journal of Educational Supervision, 3(3), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.3.3.7
- Hazi, H. M. (2021). A swerve in practice in times of crises: Rethinking teacher evaluation anew. In J. Glanz (Ed.), Crisis and pandemic leadership: Implications for meeting the needs of students, teachers, and parents. Rowman & Littlefield (pp. 47–58) .
- Hazi, H. M. (2022). Basic principles of teacher evaluation examined for school leaders in the 21rst century. In J. Glanz (Ed.), Managing today’s schools: New skills for school leaders in the 21rst century (pp. 51–62). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Heald, J. E. (1969). Supervision. In R. Ebel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education research (4th ed., pp. 1396–1397). Macmillan.
- Henig, J. (2021, February 9). ‘Data’ has become a dirty word to public education advocates. It doesn’t have to be. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/opinion-data-has-become-a-dirty-word-to-public-education-advocates-it-doesnt-have-to-be/2021/02?utm_source=nl&utm_medium=eml&utm_campaign=eu&M=59864264&U=&UUID=5db99379423bd8f2b72457b68b37431b
- Hermann, M., Clark, M., James-Burdumy, S., Tuttle, C., Kautz, T., Knechtel, V., Dotter, D., Smither Wulsin, C., Deke, J., & Mathematica. (2019, October). The effects of a principal professional develop program focused on instructional leadership. U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20200002/
- Hill, H., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observation: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.01.006
- Hill, H. (2020a, February 7). Does studying student data really raise test scores? Researchers say the popular practice is largely ineffective. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology/opinion-does-studying-student-data-really-raise-test-scores/2020/02
- Hill, H. (2020b, February 21). Teacher PD gets a bad rap. But two approaches do work. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinion-teacher-pd-gets-a-bad-rap-but-two-approaches-do-work/2020/02
- Hoogland, I., Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F., Heitink, M., Kippers, W., Veldkamp, B., & Dijkstra, A. (2016). Prerequisites for data-based decision making in the classroom: Research evidence and practical illustrations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.012
- Hunter, M. (1988). Effecting a reconciliation between supervision and evaluation–A reply to Popham. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 275–279. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00123823
- Ilgen, D., Fisher, C., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behaviors in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349
- Ingersoll, R., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323
- Ingvarson, L. (2005). ‘Getting it right’ symposium—paper 2: Getting professional development right. Professional Development for Teachers and School Leaders. https://research.acer.edu.au/professional_dev/4
- Kennedy, M. (2005). Inside teaching. Harvard University Press.
- Kennedy, M. (2016). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115614617
- Kennedy, M. (2019). How we learn about teacher learning. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 138–162. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X19838970
- Kraft, M., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teaching coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
- Kraft, M., & Christian, A. (2021, June). Can teacher evaluation systems produce high-quality feedback? An administrator training field experiment (EdWorkingPaper: 19-62). Annenberg Institute at Brown University/ https://doi.org/10.26300/ydle-mt05
- Lavigne, A. L., & Good, T. L. (2015). Improving teaching through observation and feedback. Routledge.
- Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. McGraw Hill.
- Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science, social equilibria and social change. Change Management, Human Relations: The First 10 Years, 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
- Lillejord, S., Elstad, E., & Kavli, H. (2018). Teacher evaluation as a wicked policy problem. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1429388
- Lillejord, S., & Borte, K. (2020). Trapped between accountability and professional leadership: School leaders and teacher evaluation. Professional Development in Education, 46(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1585384
- Lochmiller, C. R. (2019). Credibility in instructional supervision: Catalyst for differentiation. In M. L. Derrington & J. Brandon (Eds.), Differentiated teacher evaluation and professional learning: Policies and practices for promoting career growth (pp. 83–105). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Lustick, D., & Sykes, G. (2006). National board certification as professional development: What are teachers learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(5), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v14n5.2006
- Mandinach, E. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
- Martinez, F., Taut, S., & Schaaf, K. (2016). Classroom observation for evaluating and improving teaching: An international perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 49, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.002
- Marzano, R. (2012). The two purposes of teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 14–19. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov12/vol70/num03/The-Two-Purposes-of-Teacher-Evaluation.aspx
- Maslow, V., & Kelley, C. (2012). Does evaluation advance teaching practice? The effects of performance evaluation on teaching quality and system change in large diverse high schools. Journal of School Leadership, 22(3), 600–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461202200307
- Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2013). Leading via teacher evaluation: The case of the missing clothes. Educational Researcher, 42(6), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13499625
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013a). Teachers for the 21rst century: Using evaluation to improve teaching. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teachers-for-the-21st-century_9789264193864-en
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013b). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD review of evaluation and assessment in education. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/synergies-for-better-learning.htm
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). A deep look into teaching: Findings from the global teaching insights video study. Teaching in focus No. 37, OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/67dd4ed7-en.pdf?expires=1631474338&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=9E08871B959A0B1647160C46CB34D1E5
- Popham, W. J. (1988). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123822
- Popham, W. J. (2013). On serving two masters: Formative and summative teacher evaluation. Principal Leadership, 13(7), 18–22. http://www.nassp.org/Content/158/PLmar13_popham.pdf
- Reinhorn, S., Moore Johnson, S., & Simon, N. (2017). Investing in development: Six high-performing, high-poverty schools implement the Massachusetts teacher evaluation policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717690605
- Ridge, B., & Lavigne, A. (2020). Improving instructional practice through peer observation and feedback. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(61), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5023
- Santiago, P., Benavides, F., Danielson, C., Goe, L., & Nusche, D. (2013). Teacher evaluation in Chile 2013. OECD Review of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264172616-en
- Schleicher, A. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing. http://dx/doi.org/10.1787/9789264113046-en
- Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. W. Tyler, & R. W. Tyler (Eds.), American educational research association monograph series on curriculum evaluation: Vol. 1. Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Rand McNally.
- Scriven, M. (1994). Duties of a teacher. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 151–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972261
- Scriven, M. (1997). Truth and objectivity in evaluation. In E. Chelimsky & W. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 477–500). Sage.
- Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12–16.
- Smith, B. (2019). Leadership for “the all of it’: Formalizing teacher-leader networks. Teachers College Record, 121(3), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100308
- Sorenson, T. B. (2016). Value-Added measurement or modeling (VAM). Education International. http://download.ei-ie.org/Docs/WebDepot/2016_EI_VAM_EN_final_Web.pdf
- St. Germain, K. (2021, November 16). ‘This is not what we signed up for’: A principal’s pleas for more support. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinion-this-is-not-what-we-signed-up-for-a-principals-plea-for-more-support/2021/11?utm_source=nl&utm_medium=eml&utm_campaign=eu&M=64210006&U=&UUID=5db99379423bd8f2b72457b68b37431b
- Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004423
- Stufflebeam, D. (2013). My tribute to a trail blazer: Evaluation iconoclast—Professor Michael Scriven. In S. Donaldson (Ed.), The future of evaluation in society: A tribute to Michael Scriven (pp. 73–91). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
- Sun, J., Przybylski, R., & Johnson, B. (2016). A review of research on teachers’ use of student data: From the perspective of school leadership. Educational Assessment. Evaluation Accountability, 28(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9238-9
- Sykes, G. (1999). Teacher and student learning: Strengthening their connection. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 151–179). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Timpereley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development. Best evidence synthesis iteration. New Zealand Ministry of Education. https://bibliotecadigital.mineduc.cl/bitstream/handle/20.500.12365/17384/154%20Teacher%20professional%20learning%20and%20development.%20best%20evidence%20synthesis%20iteration.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203770
- Tuytens, M., Devos, G., & Vanblaere, B. (2020). An integral perspective on teacher evaluation: A review of empirical studies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(6), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09321-z
- Will, M. (2021, November). Efforts to toughen teacher evaluations show no positive impact on students. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/efforts-to-toughen-teacher-evaluations-show-no-positive-impact-on-students/2021/11
- Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538