Curriculum policy, teaching, and knowledge orientations

References

• Alexander, R. (2009). Towards a comparative pedagogy. In R. Cowen & A. M. Kazamias (Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 923–942). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W. (2005). Objectives, evaluation, and the improvement of education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2014). Pragmatising the curriculum: Bringing knowledge back into the curriculum conversation, but via pragmatism. The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.874954
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstedt, M., & Fejes, A. (2019). Neoliberalism and market forces in education: Lessons from Sweden. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2020). Knowledge, content, curriculum and Didaktik: Beyond social realism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2022). Powerful knowledge, educational potential and knowledge-rich curriculum: Pushing the boundaries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(5), 599–617. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2022.2089538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z., & Luke, A. (2008). Subject matter: Defining and theorizing school subjects. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. A. Phillion (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 66–87). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1991). Common sense and science. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953: 1949–1952 (Vol. 16, pp. 242–256). Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1949)
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (2008a). Democracy and education In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey. The middle works, 1899-1924 (Vol. 9, pp. 3–370). Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1916).
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (2008b). Experience and education In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953: 1938–1939 (Vol. 13, pp. 3–62). Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1938).
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486–516). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2004). Semiotic aspects of social transformation and learning. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed, pp. 119–127). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, L. (2012). Limiting opportunities to learn in upper-secondary schooling: Differentiation and performance assessment in the context of standards-based curriculum reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(5), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M., Grimaldi, E., Hall, D., & Serpieri, R. (2016). New public management and the reform of education: European lessons for policy and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. T. (2002). Dewey’s conception of an environment for teaching and learning. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-873X.00228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.109
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270801989818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., & Sivesind, K. (2010). Conceptualising curriculum knowledge within and beyond the national context. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lgr 11. (2011). The Swedish curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2021). National curriculum making as more or less expressions of and responses to globalisation. In M. Priestley, D. Alvunger, S. Philippou, & T. Soini (Eds.), Curriculum making in Europe: Policy and practice within and across diverse contexts (pp. 29–51). Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N. (2015). Introduction: Classroom discourse and interaction research. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 3–19). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• NAE. (2022a). SALSA — A statistical model. The Swedish National Agency for Education. https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik/salsa-statistisk-modell
   Google Scholar
• NAE. (2022b). Slutbetygen för årskurs 9 på samma nivå som före pandemin [Final grades for grade 9 at the same level as before the pandemic]. Pressrelease. Retrieved December 8, 2022, from https://www.skolverket.se/om-oss/press/pressmeddelanden/pressmeddelanden/2022-09-29-slutbetygen-for-arskurs-9-pa-samma-niva-som-fore-pandemin
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2021). Transnational competence frameworks and national curriculum-making: The case of Sweden. Comparative Education, 57(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1845065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/synergies-for-better-learning.htm#conclusions
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, F. (2008). Från lärare till elever, från undervisning till lärande: utvecklingslinjer i svensk, nordisk och internationell klassrumsforskning [From teachers to students, from teaching to learning: Trends in Swedish, Nordic and international classroom research]. Vetenskapsrådet [Swedish Research Council].
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken: Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv [Learning in practice. A socio-cultural perspective]. Prisma.
   Google Scholar
• Schiro, M. S. (2013). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeper, R. W. (1986). The necessity of pragmatism: John Dewey’s conception of philosophy. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sleeter, C. E. (2007). Facing accountability in education: Democracy and equity at risk. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalized conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.342
   Google Scholar
• Sundström Sjödin, E., & Wahlström, N. (2017). Enacted realities in teachers’ experiences: Bringing materialism into pragmatism. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, B. (2021). Supportive assessment strategies as curriculum events in a performance-oriented classroom context. European Educational Research Journal, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211030387
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N. (Ed.). (2022a). Equity, teaching practice and the curriculum: Exploring differences in access to knowledge. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N. (2022b). Policy, knowledge and promoting a democratic stance. In N. Wahlström (Ed.), Equity, teaching practice and the curriculum: Exploring differences in access to knowledge (pp. 14–29). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., & Nordin, A. (2020). Policy of suspiciousness – Mobilization of educational reforms in Sweden. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1822294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (Eds.). (2018). Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (Eds.). (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2013). Revisiting curriculum, the numbers game and the inequality problem. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.754949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. D. (2008a). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. D. (2008b). From constructivism to realism in the sociology of the curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar