Profiling teacher educators’ strategies for professional digital competence development

References

• Aagaard, T., Bueie, A., & Hjukse, H. (2022). Teacher educator in a digital age: A study of transformative agency. Journal of Digital Literacy, 1, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.17.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Amdam, S. H., Kobberstad, L. R., & Tikkanen, T. I. (2022). Professional digital competence in strategy and management: A case study of three teacher education programmes in Norway. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 17(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.17.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreasen, J. K. (2023). School-based mentor teachers as boundary-crossers in an initial teacher education partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault, L., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Kim Williams, M. (2010). Professional development 2.0: Transforming teacher education pedagogy with 21st century tools. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2010.10784651
   Google Scholar
• Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2018). Interpreting and understanding logits, probits, and other nonlinear probability models. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, N., Besselink, E., & Oosterheert, I. (2017). The power of video feedback with structured viewing guides. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, A. C., Swarts, G. P., Hutchison, L., Katzmann, J. M., Thompson, R., Freeman, L., Schanke, A., Kilty, T. J., & Reynolds, T. (2021). Finding Spaces. Teacher Education Technology Education Sciences, 11(11), 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110733
   Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01246098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Daus, S., Aamodt, P. O., & Tømte, C. (2019). Profesjonsfaglig digital kompetanse i lærerutdanningene. Undersøkelse av tilstand, holdninger og ferdigheter ved fem grunnskolelærerutdanninger [Professional digital competence in teacher education. A survey of status, attitudes and skills at five teacher education institutions]. NIFU. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2602702
   Google Scholar
• DeCoito, I., & Vacca, S. (2020). The case for digital timelines in teaching and teacher education. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue Internationale du e-learning Et la Formation À Distance, 35(1). https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1171
   Google Scholar
• Diery, A., Vogel, F., Knogler, M., & Seidel, T. (2020). Evidence-Based Practice in Higher Education: Teacher Educators’ Attitudes, Challenges, and Uses. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00062
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., Kjällander, S., & Järvelä, S. (2021). Facing the challenges of ‘digital competence’. A Nordic agenda for curriculum development for the 21st century. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 16(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.18261/.1891-943x-2021-02-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Schoolnet. (2018). Online self-assessment. Mentoring technology-enhanced pedagogy. http://mentep.eun.org/documents/2390578/2452293/Brochure_Mentep_2017.pdf/32784bcf-ca0d-49ab-af55-929abd15ab79
   Google Scholar
• Evangelio, C., Rodriguez-Gonzalez, P., Fernandez-Rio, J., & Gonzalez-Villora, S. (2022). Cyberbullying in elementary and middle school students: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 176, 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/181966/
   Google Scholar
• Gondwe, F. (2021). Technology professional development for teacher educators: A literature review and proposal for further research. SN Social Sciences, 1(8), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00184-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., Loftsgarden, M., & Ottestad, G. (2014). Nyutdannede lærere: Profesjonsfaglig digitale kompetanse og erfaringer med IKT i lærerutdanningen. Senter for IKT i utdanningen.
   Google Scholar
• Hackathorn, J., Solomon, E. D., Blankmeyer, K. L., Tennial, R. E., & Garczynski, A. M. (2011). Learning by doing: An empirical study of active teaching techniques. Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/e683152011-599
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K., & Klette, K. (2015). Indicators of quality in teacher education: Looking at features of teacher education from an international perspective. In G. K. LeTendre & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), Promoting and sustaining a quality teacher workforce (pp. 239–278). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920140000027013
   Google Scholar
• Hatlevik, O. E., & Bjarnø, V. (2021). Examining the relationship between resilience to digital distractions, ICT self-efficacy, motivation, approaches to studying, and time spent on individual studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, J. M., Reise, S. P., & Kim, K. H. (2007). Detecting mixtures from structural model differences using latent variable mixture modeling: A comparison of relative model fit statistics. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401–412). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_32
   Google Scholar
• Hjukse, H., Aagaard, T., Bueie, A. A., Moser, T., & Vika, K. S. (2020). Digitalisering i grunnskolelærerutdanningen: Om faglige forskjeller i arbeidet med profesjonsfaglig digital kompetanse. Acta Didactica Norden, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.8023
   Google Scholar
• Ifinedo, E., Rikala, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2020). Factors affecting Nigerian teacher educators’ technology integration: Considering characteristics, knowledge constructs, ICT practices and beliefs. Computers & Education, 146, 103760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelentrić, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A.-T. (2017). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. https://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/inenglish/pfdk_framework_en_low2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.773419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofoed, T., Wilhelmsen, J., & Ørnes, H. (2019). Digital tilstand 2018. Perspektiver på digitalisering for læring i høyere utdanning. Direktoratet for internasjonalisering og kvalitetsutvikling i høyere utdanning (Diku). https://hkdir.no/rapporter-undersokelser-og-statistikk/digital-tilstand-2018-perspektiver-pa-digitalisering-for-laering-i-hoyere-utdanning
   Google Scholar
• Krumsvik, R. J., Egelandsdal, K., Sarastuen, N. K., Jones, L. Ø., & Eikeland, O. J. (2013). Sammenhengen mellom IKT-bruk og læringsutbytte (SMIL) i videregående opplæring. Kommunesektorens organisasjon (KS) og Universitetet i Bergen. https://www.iktogskole.no/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Sluttrapport_SMIL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krumsvik, R. J., & Jones, L. Ø. (2017). Utdanningsledelse og digitale læringsformer i høyere utdanning. Uniped, 1(40), 18–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindfors, M., Pettersson, F., & Olofsson, A. D. (2021). Conditions for professional digital competence: The teacher educators’ view. Education Inquiry, 12(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1890936
   Google Scholar
• Lisborg, S., Händel, V. D., Schrøder, V., & Rehder, M. M. (2021). Digital competences in Nordic teacher education: An expanding agenda. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 5(4), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.429
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, L., Warwick, P., Rasmussen, I., Ludvigsen, S., & Cook, V. (2018). Classroom dialogue and digital technologies: A scoping review. The Official Journal of the IFIP Technical Committee on Education, 23(5), 1995–2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9701-y
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(2), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. (Vol. 2, pp. 551–611). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199934898.013.0025
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. B. (2014). Mixed mode latent class analysis: An examination of fit index performance for classification. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.935751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J. S., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). Disentangling shape from level effects in person-centered analyses: An illustration based on university teachers’ multidimensional profiles of effectiveness. Structural Equation Modeling, 22(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrove, A. T., Powers, J. R., Rebar, C. L., & Musgrove, G. J. (2018). Real or fake? Resources for teaching college students how to identify fake news. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1480444
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class–latent growth modeling. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 291–322). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10409-010
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2022). Mplus user’s Guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, I., & Engeness, I. (2021). Peer feedback with video annotation to promote student teachers’ reflections. Acta Didactica Norden, 15(3), 24. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.8192
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, I., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Afdal, H. W. (2023). Teacher educators’ professional agency in facilitating professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. J., Voithofer, R., & Cheng, S.-L. (2019). Mediating factors that influence the technology integration practices of teacher educators. Computers & Education, 128, 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2022). The educational mirror. https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/publikasjoner/utdanningsspeilet/utdanningsspeilet-2022/den-digitale-tilstanden-i-skole-og-barnehage/digital-infrastruktur-og-skolehverdag/
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, A. H., & Sadera, W. A. (2019). A review of faculty development models that build teacher educators’ technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(4), 437–464. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/208226/
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, C., & Vika, K. S. (2022). Profesjonsfaglig digital kompetanse i grunnskole-lærerutdanningene: Status og endringer over tid ved fem grunnskolelærerutdanninger i Norge (2019–2021). NIFU Arbeidsnotat, 2022(2). https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2997391
   Google Scholar
• Ping, C., Schellings, G., & Beijaard, D. (2018). Teacher educators’ professional learning: A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reading, C., & Doyle, H. (2012). Teacher educators as learners: Enabling learning while developing innovative practice in ICT-rich education. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 109–116. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.196910
   Google Scholar
• Røkenes, F. M. (2016). Digital storytelling in teacher education: A meaningful way of integrating ICT in ESL teaching. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.2431
   Google Scholar
• Røkenes, F. M., Grüters, R., Skaalvik, C., Lie, T. G., Østerlie, O., Järnerot, A., Humphrey, K., Gjøvik, Ø., & Letnes, M.-A. (2022). Teacher educators’ professional digital competence in primary and lower secondary school teacher education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 17(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.17.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Development of student teachers’ digital competence in teacher education: A literature review. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 250–280. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-03
   Google Scholar
• Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2016). Prepared to teach ESL with ICT? A study of digital competence in Norwegian teacher education. Computers & Education, 97, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Howard, S. H., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready? Computers in Human Behavior, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., Maassen, P., Borgan, M., Oftebro, M., & Karseth, B. (2007). Use, updating and integration of ICT in higher education: Linking purpose, people and pedagogy. Higher Education, 54(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9004-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theelen, H., van den Beemt, A., & Brok, P. D. (2019). Classroom simulations in teacher education to support preservice teachers’ interpersonal competence: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education, 129,14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0062-1
   Google Scholar