Gender-Equalizing Family Policies and Mothers' Entry into Paid Work: Recent Evidence From Norway

REFERENCES

• Albrecht, James, Anders Björklund, and Susan Vroman. 2003. “Is There a Glass Ceiling in Sweden?” Journal of Labor Economics 21(1): 145–77. doi: 10.1086/344126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, Paul D. 1995. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brandth, Berit and Bente Øverli. 1998. Omsorgspermisjon med ”kjærlig tvang”: En kartlegging av fedrekvoten. Trondheim: Allforsk.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Simon, Paul Gregg, Carol Propper, and Elizabeth Washbrook. 2008. “Maternity Rights and Mothers’ Return to Work.” Labour Economics 15(2): 168–201. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2005.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools, Sandra, Jon H. Fiva, and Lars Johannesen Kirkebøen. 2011: “Causal Effects of Paternity Leave on Parents and Children.” Discussion Paper 657, Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Datta Gupta, Nabanita, Nina Smith, and Mette Verner. 2008. “The Impact of Nordic Countries’ Family Friendly Policies on Employment, Wages, and Children.” Review of Economics of the Household 6(1): 65–89. doi: 10.1007/s11150-007-9023-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drange, Nina and Mari Rege. 2013. “Trapped at Home: The Effect of Mothers’ Temporary Labor Market Exits on their Subsequent Work Career.” Labour Economics 24: 125–36. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egge-Hoveid, Kristin. 2012. “Stadig færre mottakere av kontantstøtte.” [Increasingly fewer recipients of the cash-for-care benefit]. http://www.ssb.no/vis/magasinet/slik_lever_vi/art-2012-03-05-01.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsæter, Anne Lise. 2003. “The Complexity of Family Policy Reform: The Case of Norway.” European Societies 5(4): 419–43. doi: 10.1080/1461669032000127679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingsæter, Anne Lise and Lars Gulbrandsen. 2007. “Closing the Childcare Gap: The Interaction of Childcare Provision and Mothers’ Agency in Norway.” Journal of Social Policy 36(4): 649–69. doi: 10.1017/S0047279407001225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Even, William E. 1987. “Career Interruptions Following Childbirth.” Journal of Labor Economics 5(2): 255–77. doi: 10.1086/298147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evertsson, Marie and Ann-Zofie Duvander. 2011. “Parental Leave – Possibility or Trap? Does Family Leave Length Affect Swedish Women's Labor Market Opportunities?” European Sociological Review 27(4): 435–50. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornick, Janet C. and Marcia K. Meyers. 2008. “Creating Gender Egalitarian Societies: An Agenda for Reform.” Politics and Society 36(3): 313–49. doi: 10.1177/0032329208320562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grambo, Anne-Cathrine and Sigrid Myklebø. 2009. “Moderne familier – tradisjonelle valg. En studie av mors og fars uttak av foreldrepermisjon.” [Modern families – traditional choices. A study of mothers’ and fathers’ update of parental leave]. NAV-rapport 2/2009, Norwegian Welfare and Labor Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, William H. 2000. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hakim, Catherine. 2008. “Is Gender Equality Legislation Becoming Counter-Productive?” Public Policy Research 15(3): 133–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-540X.2008.00528.x
   Google Scholar
• Hardoy, Inés and Pål Schøne. 2013. “Enticing Even Higher Female Labor Supply: The Impact of Cheaper Day Care.” Review of Economics of the Household (doi:10.1007/s11150-013-9215-8).
   Google Scholar
• Hook, Jennifer L. and Christina M. Wolfe. 2012. “New Fathers? Residential Fathers’ Time with Children in Four Countries.” Journal of Family Issues 33(4): 415–50. doi: 10.1177/0192513X11425779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joesch, Jutta M. 1997. “Paid Leave and the Timing of Women's Employment Before and After Childbirth.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 59(4): 1008–21. doi: 10.2307/353799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karu, Marre. 2012. “Parental Leave in Estonia: Does Familization of Fathers Lead to Defamilization of Mothers?” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 20(2): 94–108. doi: 10.1080/08038740.2011.601466
   Google Scholar
• Kitterød, Ragni Hege. 2007. “Fremdeles et tosporet foreldreskap? Mors og fars yrkesarbeid i barnefasen” [Still dual-tracked parenthood practices? Mothers’ and fathers’ employment and working hours]. In Arbeidslivets klemmer [Time squeezes in working life], edited by Elin Kvande and Bente Rasmussen, 221–48. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Kitterød, Ragni Hege. 2012. “Fedre deltar mer i husarbeid og omsorg” [Women's paid and unpaid work: Changes and disparities]. Samfunnsspeilet 26(4): 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kitterød, Ragni Hege and Marit Rønsen. 2012. “Kvinner i arbeid ute og hjemme: Endring og ulikhet” [Fathers participate more in housework and childcare]. In Velferdsstatens familier. Nye sosiologiske perspektiver [The families of the welfare state. New sociological perspectives], edited by Anne Lise Ellingsæter and Karin Widerberg, 161–90. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeldstad, Randi and Erik H. Nymoen. 2012. “Part-Time Work and Gender: Worker versus Job Explanations.” International Labor Review 151(1–2): 85–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2012.00136.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsadam, Andreas, Elisabeth Ugreninov, and Henning Finseraas. 2011. “The Long-Term Effect of Own and Spousal Parental Leave on Mothers’ Earnings.” In “Gender, Work, and Attitudes”, edited by Andreas Kotsadam. PhD diss., University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Leibowitz, Arleen, Jacob Alex Klerman, and Linda J. Waite. 1992. “Employment of New Mothers and Childcare Choice.” Journal of Human Resources 27(1): 112–33. doi: 10.2307/145914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, Hadas and Moshe Semyonov. 2006. “A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women's Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 111(6): 1910–49. doi: 10.1086/499912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mincer, Jacob and Haim Ofek. 1982. “Interrupted Work Careers: Depreciation and Restoration of Human Capital.” Journal of Human Resources 17(1): 3–24. doi: 10.2307/145520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Children and Family Affairs. 1998. Innføring av kontantstøtte til småbarnsforeldre [Introduction of a cash for childcare benefit for parents with small children]. Stortingsproposisjon [Bill for the Norwegian Parliament] 53, 1997–98.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Helena Skyt, Marianne Simonsen, and Mette Verner. 2004. “Does the Gap in Family-Friendly Policies Drive the Family Gap?” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106(4): 721–44. doi: 10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Official Reports (NOU) 2004:29. Kan flere jobbe mer? - deltid og undersysselsetting i norsk arbeidsliv [Can more people work more? Part-time work and underemployment in the Norwegian labor market]. Report presented to the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Official Reports (NOU) 2008:6. Kjønn og lønn. Fakta, analyser og virkemidler for likelønn [Gender and wages. Facts, analyses, and instruments for equal pay]. Report presented to the Ministry of Family and Gender Equality.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. OECD Economic Surveys: Norway 2012. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-nor-2012-en.
   Google Scholar
• Pronzato, Chiara Daniela. 2009: “Return to Work After Childbirth: Does Parental Leave Matter in Europe?” Review of Economics of the Household 7(4): 341–60. doi: 10.1007/s11150-009-9059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prop. 83 L [Proposition 83L for the Norwegian Parliament] 2012–13. Endringer i arbeidsmiljøloven mv [Changes in the Working Environment Act]. A recommendation from the Ministry of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, Elina and Nina Smith. 2003. Career Interruptions Due to Parental Leave: A Comparative Study of Denmark and Sweden. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 1. doi: 10.1787/048564246616
   Google Scholar
• Ray, Rebecca, Janet C. Gornick, and John Schmitt. 2010. “Who Cares? Assessing Generosity and Gender Equality in Parental Leave Policy Designs in 21 Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 20(3): 196–216. doi: 10.1177/0958928710364434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønsen, Marit. 2009. “Long-Term Effects of Cash for Childcare on Mothers’ Labor Supply.” Labor 23(3): 507–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rønsen, Marit and Marianne Sundstrøm. 1996. “Maternal Employment in Scandinavia: A Comparison of the After-Birth Employment Activity of Norwegian and Swedish Women.” Journal of Population Economics 9(3): 267–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00176688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønsen, Marit and Marianne Sundstrøm. 2002. “Family Policy and After-Birth Employment Among New Mothers.” European Journal of Population 18(2): 121–52. doi: 10.1023/A:1015532305179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønsen, Marit and Ragni Hege Kitterød. 2012. “Entry into Work Following Childbirth Among Mothers in Norway. Recent Trends and Variation.” Discussion Paper No. 702. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhm, Christopher J. 1998. “The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(1): 285–317. doi: 10.1162/003355398555586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schøne, Pål. 2004. “Labor Supply Effects of a Cash-for-Care Subsidy.” Journal of Population Economics 17(4): 703–27. doi: 10.1007/s00148-003-0176-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2011. “Kindergartens, 2010, final figures.” https://www.ssb.no/a/english/kortnavn/barnehager_en/tab-2011-06-15-04-en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Theunissen, Gert, Marijke Verbruggen, Anneleen Forrier, and Luc Sels. 2011. “Career Sidestep, Wage Setback? The Impact of Different Types of Employment Interruptions on Wages.” Gender, Work and Organization 18(S1): 110–31.
   Google Scholar
• Waldfogel, Jane, Yoshio Higuchi, and Masahiro Abe. 1999. “Family Leave Policies and Women's Retention After Childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan.” Journal of Population Economics 12(4): 523–46. doi: 10.1007/s001480050112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar