Cash for Care as Special Money: The Meaning and Uses of the Care Allowance in Close Relationships in the Czech Republic

REFERENCES

• Anderson, Elizabeth. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barvínková, Jana and August Österle. 2013. “Long-Term Care Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of the Czech Republic.” In Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe: Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts, edited by Constanzo Ranci and Emmanuele Pavolini, 243–65. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bettio, Francesca, Annamaria Simonazzi, and Paola Villa. 2006. “Change in Care Regimes and Female Migration: The ‘Care Drain’ in the Mediterranean.” Journal of European Social Policy 16(3): 271–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettio, Francesca and Alina Verashchagina. 2010. “Long-Term Care for the Elderly: Provisions and Providers in 33 European Countries.” Report, EU Expert Group on Gender and Employment (EGGE).
   Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingo. 2007. “New Moral Economies of Welfare: The Case of Domiciliary Elder Care in Germany, France and Britain.” European Societies 9(2): 201–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calasanti, Toni. 2003. “Masculinities and Care Work in Old Age.” In Gender and Ageing: Changing Roles and Relationships, edited by Sarah Arber, Kate Davidson, and Jay Ginn, 15–30. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Challis, David and Bleddyn Davies. 1980. “A New Approach to Community Care for the Elderly.” British Journal of Social Work 10(1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Roit, Barbara and Blanche Le Bihan. 2011. “Cash-for-Care Schemes and the Changing Role of Elderly Peoplés Informal Caregivers in France and Italy.” In Care Betwen Work and Welfare in European Societies, edited by Birgit Pfay-Effinger and Tine Rostgaard, 177–203. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Degiuli, Francesca. 2010. “The Burden of Long-Term Care: How Italian Family Care-Givers Become Employers.” Ageing and Society 30(5): 755–77.
   Google Scholar
• Dudová, Radka. 2015. Postarat se ve stáří. Rodina a zajištění péče o seniory [Care in old age. Family and the provision of elderly care]. Praha: Sociologické Nakladatelství.
   Google Scholar
• Dudová, Radka. 2018. “Doing Gender and Age: The Case of Informal Elderly Care in the Czech Republic.” International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 12(1): 41–3.
   Google Scholar
• Dudová, Radka and Marta Vohlídalová. 2018. “Muži a ženy pečující o seniory v rodině” [Men and women caring for seniors in the family]. Sociologický Časopis/Czech Sociological Review 54(2): 219–51.
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, Nancy, Lois B. Shaw, and Agneta Stark. 2005. “Introduction: Gender and Aging.” Feminist Economics 11(2): 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksmann, Miriam and Dawn Lyon. 2006. “Configurations of Care Work: Paid and Unpaid Elder Care in Italy and the Netherlands.” Sociological Research Online 11(2): 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Hilary. 1983. “Caring: A Labour of Love.” In A Labour of Love: Women, Work and Caring, edited by Janet Finch and Dulcie Groves, 13–30. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hašková, Hana and Steven Saxonberg. 2016. “The Revenge of History - The Institutional Roots of Post-Communist Family Policy in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.” Social Policy and Administration 50(5): 559–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubíková, Olga. 2012. “Přímé platby za péči v kontextu nevyjasněného statusu neformální péče” [Direct payments in the context of a vague status of informal care]. Sociální práce 12(4): 113–25.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Thérèse. 2003. “Paying for Informal Care: A Contradictio in Terminis?” European Societies 5(4): 397–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenson, Jane and Stephane Jacobzone. 2000. “Care Allowances For the Frail Elderly and Their Impact on Women Care-Givers.” OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Křížková, Alena, Andrew M. Penner, and Trond Petersen. 2010. “The Legacy of Equality and the Weakness of Law: Within-Job Gender Wage Inequality in the Czech Republic.” European Sociological Review 26(1): 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchařová, Věra. 2017. Zpráva o rodině [Report on family]. Praha: MPSV.
   Google Scholar
• Lüscher, Kurt and Karl Pillemer. 1998. “Intergenerational Ambivalence: A New Approach to the Study of Parent-Child Relations in Later Life.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 60(2): 413–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, Dawn. 2010. “Intersections and Boundaries of Work and Non-Work: The Case of Eldercare in Comparative European Perspective.” European Societies 12(2): 163–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maříková, Hana and Blanka Plasová. 2012. “Kontinuita nebo změna v systému zajištění péče o seniory v České republice od roku 1948 z genderové perspektivy” [The gender perspective of elderly care policies in the Czech Republic from 1948 – continuity or change?]. Fórum Sociální Politiky 6(3): 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Markent, S. R. O. and Vúpsv, V. V. I.. 2011. Případové studie způsobů zajištění péče o příjemce příspěvku na péči [Case studies of the provision of care for the beneficiaries of the care allowance]. Praha: MPSV.
   Google Scholar
• Memorandum of the Law. 2005. “Governement Proposal for Release on Social Services.” Důvodová zpráva k Zákonu o sociálních službách sb.108/2006. http://www.psp.cz/sqw/text/tiskt.sqw?O=4&CT=1102&CT1=0.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, Christine. 2009. There’s No Place Like Home: Place and Care in an Ageing Society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mingione, Enzo. 1991. Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life Beyond the Market Paradigm. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, Maxine and Marylin Thomson. 2011. “Cash Transfers, Gender Equity and Women’s Empowerment in Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia.” Gender and Development 19(2): 195–212.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Julia A. and Nancy Folbre. 2000. “For Love or Money—Or Both?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4): 123–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Průša, Ladislav. 2013. Ekonomická efektivita zajišťování péče o příjemce příspěvku na péči. [Economic effectiveness of care provision to the receivers of the care allowance]. Praha: VÚPSV.
   Google Scholar
• Rostgaard, Tine. 2011. “Care As You Like It: The Construction of a Consumer Approach in Home Care in Denmark.” Nordic Journal of Social Research 2. https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.2042.
   Google Scholar
• Šabatová, Anna. 2018. “Dostupnost sociálních služeb pro osoby sporuchou autistického spektra” [Availability of social services for people with Autism Spectrum Disorder]. Brno.
   Google Scholar
• Shmidt, Viktoria. 2015. Child Welfare Discourses and Practices in the Czech Lands: The Segregation of Roma and Disabled Children During the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Brno: Masaryk University.
   Google Scholar
• Shutes, Isabel and Carlos Chiatti. 2012. “Migrant Labour and the Marketisation of Care for Older People: The Employment of Migrant Care Workers by Families and Service Providers.” Journal of European Social Policy 22(4): 392–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirovátka, Tomáš, and Jana Válková. 2017. Understanding Care Policies in Changing Times: Experiences and Lessons from the Czech Republic and Norway. Brno: MuniPress.
   Google Scholar
• Souralová, Adéla and Eva Šlesingerová. 2017. “Post-Socialist Eldercare in the Czech Republic: Institutions, Families and the Market.” In The Routledge Handbook of Social Care Work Around the World, edited by Karen Christensen and Doria Pilling, 159–70. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sýkorová, Dana. 2007. Autonomie ve stáří: Kapitoly z gerontosociologie [Autonomy in old age: Chapters on gerontosociology]. Praha: Sociologické Nakladatelství.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, Peter. 1999. “Markets and Motives Trust and Egoism in Welfare Markets.” Journal of Social Policy 28(1): 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungerson, Claire. 1995. “Gender, Cash and Informal Care: European Perspectives and Dilemmas.” Journal of Social Policy 24(1): 31–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungerson, Claire. 2005. “Gender, Labour Markets and Care Work in Five European Funding Regimes.” In Care and Social Integration in European Societies, edited by Birgit Pfau-Effinger and Birgit Geissler, 47–71. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ungerson, Claire and Sue Yeandle. 2007. Cash for Care in Developed Welfare States. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Valenta, Milan and Jan Michalík. 2008. “Výzkum pracovních kompetencí osob pečujících o člena rodiny se zdravotním postižením na území hlavního města Prahy” [Research on work competence of persons providing care to a family member with disability in the capital city of Prague]. VCIZP, Praha.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hooren, Franca J. 2012. “Varieties of Migrant Care Work: Comparing Patterns of Migrant Labour in Social Care.” Journal of European Social Policy 22(2): 133–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Víšek, Petr and Ladislav Průša. 2012. Optimalizace sociálních služeb [Optimalization of social services]. Prague: VÚPSV.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Fiona. 2012. “Converging Variations in Migrant Care Work in Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 22(4): 363–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeandle, Sue and Clare Ungerson. 2007. “Conceptualizing Cash for Care: The Origins of Contemporary Debates.” In Cash for Care in Developed Welfare States, edited by Clare Ungerson and Sue Yeandle, 1–12. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, Viviana A. 1989. “The Social Meaning of Money: ‘Special Monies.’” American Journal of Sociology 95(2): 342–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, Viviana A. 1998. “How Do We Know Whether a Monetary Transaction is a Gift, an Entitlement, or Compensation?” In Economics, Values, and Organization, edited by A. Ben-Ner, and L. Putterman, 329–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, Viviana A.. 2005. The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar