The Neapolitan way to the commons: poetics of irony and ‘creative use of the law’ in the case of L’Asilo

References

• Allum, Felia, and Percy Allum. 2008. “Revisiting Naples: Clientelism and Organized Crime.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 13 (3): 340–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545710802218569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaturo, Enrica. 2019. “Introduction.” In Napoli. Persone, spazi e pratiche di innovazione, edited by Enrica Amaturo and Anna Maria Zaccaria, 4–19. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
   Google Scholar
• Andretta, Massimiliano. 2005. “Movimenti e democrazie tra globale e locale: il caso di Napoli.” In La democrazia locale tra rappresentanza e partecipazione, edited by F. Gelli, 281–318. Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Andretta, Massimiliano, Giovanni Piazza, and Anna Subirats. 2015. “Urban Dynamics and Social Movements.” In The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, edited by Donatella della Porta and Mario Diani, 200–215. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apoifis, Nicolas. 2017. Anarchy in Athens. An Ethnography of Militancy, Emotions, and Violence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biorcio, Roberto, and Rossana Sampugnaro. 2019. “The Five-star Movement From the Street to Local and National Institutions.” Contemporary Italian Politics 11 (1): 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Boni, Stefano, and Riccardo Ciavolella. 2015. “Aspiring to Alterpolitics. Anthropology, Radical Theory, and Social Movements.” FOCAAL 72: 3–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2015.720101.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, Luciano. 2013. “La politica di Bassolino e il contesto nazionale.” Meridiana 77: 233–241.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, Luciano. 2018. “Crisi del clientelismo di partito e piccole rappresentanze territoriali. Forme e spazi del consenso personale a Napoli.” Quaderni di Sociologia 78: 79–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.2169.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, Luciano, and Domenico Fruncillo. 2019. “Il populismo di sinistra: il Movimento 5 Stelle e il Movimento Arancione a Napoli.” Meridiana 96: 129–158.
   Google Scholar
• Calafati, Antonio. 2016. “Napoli: la costruzione di una città strategica.” In Società, economia e spazio a Napoli. Esplorazioni e riflessioni, edited by G. Punziano. GSSI Social Sciences, Working Papers 28.
   Google Scholar
• Capone, Nicola. 2013. “The Assemblies of the City of Naples: A Long Battle to Defend the Landscape and Environment.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 24 (4): 46–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2013.846493.
   Google Scholar
• Casas-Cortés, Maribel, Michael Osterweil, and Dana E. Powell. 2013. “Transformations in Engaged Ethnography: Knowledge, Networks, and Social Movements.” In Insurgent Encounters: Transnational Activism, Ethnography, and the Political, edited by Jeff Juris and Alex Khasnabish, 199–228. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, Ernesto. 2012. “The Indignados of Spain: A Precedent to Occupy Wall Street.” Social Movement Studies 11 (3–4): 309–319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.708830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirulli, Adriano, and Enrico Gargiulo. 2017 “Gli spazi occupati a Napoli: informalità, trasformazioni urbane e costruzione del soggetto politico tra beni comuni e populismo.” In Partecipzione civica, beni comuni e cura della città, edited by Maria Cristina Marchetti and Andrea Millefiorini. Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Coccoli, Lorenzo. 2014. “Dai commons al comune. Temi e problemi, in Pubblico, privato, commune.” Fogli di filosofia 5: 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, John, and Jane Comaroff. 2012. “Theory From the South: Or, How Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa.” Anthropological Forum 22 (2): 113–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.694169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzolino, Adriano. 2017. “The Commons and the Civic and Collective Urban Use: From Theory to the Praxis of L’Asilo, Napoli.” Paper presented at the conference Participatory Governance in Culture, 22–24 November, Rijeka, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, Massimo, and David Harvie. 2014. “The Commons.” In The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organization, edited by M. Parker, G. Cheney, V. Fournier, C. Land, 280–294. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Matteis, Stefano. 2012. Napoli in scena. Antropologia della città del teatro. Rome: Donzelli.
   Google Scholar
• De Tullio, Maria Francesca. 2018. Commons Towards New Participatory Institutions: The Neapolitan Experience. In Exploring Commonism – A New Aesthetics of the Real, edited by N. Dock and P. Gielen, 299–314. Amsterdam: Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, Donatella, and D. Rucht, eds. 2015. Meeting Democracy. Power and Deliberation in Global Justice Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, Donatella, Massimiliano Andretta, Lorenzo Mosca, and Herbert Reiter. 2006. Globalization From Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dellenbaugh, Mary, Markus Kip, Majken Bienok, Agnes K. Müller, and Martin Schwegmann, eds. 2015. Urban Commons: Moving Beyond State and Market. Basel: Birkäuser Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Dines, Nick. 2000. “What are Social Centers? A Study of Self-Managed Occupations During the 1990s.” Transgressions: A Journal of Urban Exploration 5: 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Dines, Nick. 2012. Tuff City. Urban Change and Contested Space in Central Naples. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, Chris. 2014. Another Politics. Talking Across Today’s Transformative Movements. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Mark. 2012. “E. P. Thompson and Moral Economies.” In A Companion to Moral Anthropology, edited by Didier Fassin, 49–66. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, Didier. 2012. “Toward a Critical Moral Anthropology.” In A Companion to Moral Anthropology, edited by Didier Fassin, 1–17. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, Didier. 2014. “The Ethical Turn in Anthropology. Promises and Uncertainties.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 429–435. doi: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.025.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, James, and Mary Taylor Huber, eds. 2001. Irony in Action. Anthropology, Practice, and the Moral Imagination. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. 2009. Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. 2014. The Democracy Project. A History, a Crisis, a Movement. London and New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gribaudi, Gabriella. 1996. “Images of the South.” In Italian Cultural Studies: An Introduction, edited by R. Lumley and D. Forgacs, 72–87. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gribaudi, Gabriella. 1999. Donne, uomini, famiglie. Napoli nel ‘900. Naples: l’ancora.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, Gassan. 2012, “Critical Anthropological Thought and the Radical Political Imaginary Today.” Critique of Anthropology 32 (3): 285–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12449105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haiven, Max, and Alex Khasnabish. 2014. The Radical Imagination. Social Movement Research in the Age of Austerity. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (3859): 1243–1248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2017. Assembly. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzfeld, Michael. 1997. Cultural Intimacy. Social Poetics in the Nation-State. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herzfeld, Michael. 2001. “Irony and Power. Toward a Politics of Mockery in Greece.” In Irony in Action. Anthropology, Practice, and the Moral Imagination, edited by J. Fernandez and M. T. Huber, 63–86. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kadir, Nazima. 2016. The Autonomous Life? Paradoxes of Hierarchy and Authority in the Squatters’ Movement in Amsterdam. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kioupkiolis, Alexandros. 2019. The Common and Counter-Hegemonic Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kioupkiolis, Alexandros. 2020a. The Common. Final Report “Heteropolitics. Refiguring the Common and the Political” (ERC-COG 2017-2020).
   Google Scholar
• Kioupkiolis, Alexandros. 2020b. The Political. Final Report “Heteropolitics. Refiguring the Common and the Political” (ERC-COG 2017-2020).
   Google Scholar
• Kip, Markus. 2015. “Moving Beyond the City: Conceptualizing Urban Commons From a Critical Urban Studies PerspectiveIn Urban Commons: Moving Beyond State and Market, edited by M. Dellenbaugh et al 42–59. Basel: Birkäuser Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Koensler, Alexander. 2012. “Per un’antropologia dei movimenti sociali.” In Comprendere il dissenso. Etnografia e antropologia dei movimenti sociali, edited by A. Koensler and A. Rossi, 4756. Perugia: Morlacchi.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. 1996. Emancipation(s). London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laino, Giovanni. 2018. “Community Hub a Napoli fra creatività e divari.” Territorio 84: 98–106.
   Google Scholar
• L'Asilo. 2012. About us. https://www.exasilofilangieri.it/chi-siamo/ (accessed 18 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Le Bart, Christian, Lefebvre, Rémi (eds). 2005. La proximité en politique. Usages, rhétoriques,pratiques. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1967. Structural Anthropology. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lorey, Isabel. 2014. “The 2011 Occupy Movements: Rancière and the Crisis of Democracy.” Theory, Culture and Society 31 (7/8): 43–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414550835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucarelli, Alberto. 2014. “Beni comuni. Contributo per una teoria giuridica.” Costituzionalismo.it 3.
   Google Scholar
• Marella, Maria Rosaria. 2012. “Introduzione. Per un diritto dei beni comuni.” In Oltre il pubblico e il privato. Per un diritto dei beni comuni, edited by M. R. Marella, 9–28. Milan: Ombre Corte.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, Ugo, and Laura Nader. 2008. Plunder. When the Rule of Law is Illegal. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Micciarelli, Giuseppe. 2017. Introduzione all’uso civico e collettivo urbano. La gestione diretta dei beni comuni urbani. Munus 1: 135–161.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, Nelson. 2002. The View from Vesuvius: Italian Culture and Southern Question. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlebach, Andrea. 2018. “Commonwealth: On Democracy and Dispossession in Italy.” History and Anthropology 29 (3): 342–358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2018.1458719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, June. 2005. Introduction: social movements and global processes. In Social movements. An anthropological reader, edited by June Nash. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, Italo. 1996. Managing existence in Naples: Morality, Action, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzella, Mario. 2019. Altrenapoli. Turin: Rosenberg&Sellier.
   Google Scholar
• Piscopo, Carmine. 2017. Per una cultura del territorio e degli spazi democratica e partecipata, www.ateatro.it (accessed 15 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Punziano, G., ed. 2016. Società, economia e spazio a Napoli. Esplorazioni e riflessioni, GSSI Social Sciences, Working Papers 28.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, Ermanno. 1995. Mistero napoletano. Turin: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Sales, Isaia. 2012. Napoli non è Berlino. Ascesa e declino di Bassolino e del sogno di riscatto del Sud. Rome: Baldini & Castoldi-Dalai.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Jane, ed. 1998. Italy’s Southern Question. Orientalism in One Country. New York and Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spanò, Michele. 2013. “Who’s the Subject of the Commons? An Essay in Genealogy.” In Future Generations and the Commons, edited by S. Bailey, G. Farrell and U. Mattei, 45–60. Strasbourg: Publications of the Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the 18th Century.” Past&Present 50 (1): 76–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/past/50.1.76.
   Google Scholar
• Treccani Encyclopedia. 2020. Usi civici. http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/usi-civici_%28Enciclopedia-Italiana%29/(accessed 13 March 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Vesco, Antonio. 2020. “Case Studies in Italy.” Final Report “Heteropolitics. Refiguring the common and the political” (ERC-COG 2017–2020)
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, Dorothy. 2001. La raccomandazione. Rome: Donzelli.
   Google Scholar