The benefits of argumentation are cross-culturally robust: The case of Japan

References

• Becker, C. B. (1986). Reasons for the lack of argumentation and debate in the Far East. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(1), 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), 127–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branham, R. J. (1994). Debate and dissent in late Tokugawa and Meiji Japan. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30(3), 131–149.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W., & Brown, P. B. (1995). Cooperative learning in Latin America: A perspective from the alternative education experience. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(3), 255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harbsmeier, C. (1998). Language and logic. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, Y., & Hirose, Y. (2005). What the Japanese language tells us about the alleged Japanese relational self. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), 219–251.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., &Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2012). When are two heads better than one and why? Science, 336(6079), 360–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Miner, A. G. (2002). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 605–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N. Y. L., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). Are there cross-cultural differences in reasoning? In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 459–464). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, V., Minson, J. A., Bryan, C. J., & Ross, L. (2011). Naïve realism and capturing the “wisdom of dyads.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 507–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lount, R. B., Jr., & Phillips, K. W. (2007). Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 214–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejovsky, B., & Budescu, D. V. (2007). Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 854–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111(4), 960–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. (2011). On the universality of argumentative reasoning. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11, 85–113.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., Trouche, E., Yama, H., Heintz, C., & Girotto, V. (in press). Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., Yama, H., Kawasaki, Y., Adachi, K., & Van der Henst, J.-B. (2012). Is the use of averaging in advice taking modulated by culture? Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12(1–2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Lu, P., & Van der Henst, J.-B. (in press). Do Easterners and Westerners treat contradiction differently? Journal of Cognition and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. A., & Brownell, C. A. (1975). Peers, persuasion, and Piaget: Dyadic interaction between conservers and nonconservers. Child Development, 46(4), 992–997.
   Google Scholar
• Minson, J. A., Liberman, V., & Ross, L. (2011). Two to tango. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1325–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshman, D., & Geil, M. (1998). Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking & Reasoning, 4(3), 231–248.
   Google Scholar
• Najita, T., & Koschmann, J. V. (1982). Conflict in modern Japanese history: The neglected tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, H. (1964). Ways of thinking of Eastern peoples: India, China, Tibet, Japan. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, P. M., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2005). Cooperative learning vs Confucian heritage culture's collectivism: Confrontation to reveal some cultural conflicts and mismatch. Asia Europe Journal, 3(3), 403–419.
   Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., & Heine, S. J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 763–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 653–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Moussakowski, M. (2004). Negations and natural sampling in data selection: Ecological versus heuristic explanations of matching bias. Memory & Cognition, 32(4), 570–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1996). The impact of task characteristics on the performance of structured group forecasting techniques. International Journal of Forecasting, 12(1), 73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, M. (1982). Nemawashi: A Japanese form of interpersonal communication. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 39(3), 205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1080–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scribner, S. (1977). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking: Culture and logic reconsidered. In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 483–500). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 2). London: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugie, S. (1995). Cooperative learning in Japan. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(3), 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (1995). Cooperative learning in an African context. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(3), 239–253.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1995-97791-000
   Google Scholar
• Trognon, A. (1993). How does the process of interaction work when two interlocutors try to resolve a logical problem? Cognition and Instruction, 11(3&4), 325–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouche, E., Sander, E., & Mercier, H. (in press). Arguments, more than confidence, explain the good performance of reasoning groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology: I (pp. 106–137). Harmandsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Miller, A. S. (1998). In-group bias and culture of collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(3), 315–328.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yama, H. (2001). Matching versus optimal data selection in the Wason selection task. Thinking & Reasoning, 7(3), 295–311.
   Google Scholar