Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought

References

• Aiello, D., Jarosz, A. F., Cushen, P. J., & Wiley, J. (2012). Firing the executive: When an analytic approach does and does not help problem solving. Journal of Problem Solving, 4, Article 6, 116–127.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A. P., & Thomas, K. E. (2011). A dual process account of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 109–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley, R., Strayer, D., & Atchley, P. (2012). Creativity in the wild: Improving creative reasoning through immersion in natural settings. PLoS ONE, 7, 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, L., & Stevens, A. (2009). Evidence for a verbally-based analytic component to insight problem solving. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1060–1065). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 480–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 634–639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bunge, S. A., Wendelken, C., Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Analogical reasoning and prefrontal cortex: Evidence for separable retrieval and integration mechanisms. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 239–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chein, J. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (2014). Working memory, insight, and restructuring in verbal problems: Analysis of compound remote associate problems. Memory & Cognition, 42, 67–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., Baas, M., Wolsink, I., & Roskes, M. (2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 656–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106, 1248–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1011–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 257–296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 334–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, St. J. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2003). Contextual focus: A cognitive explanation for the cultural transition of the Middle/Upper Paleolithic. In R. Alterman & D. Hirsch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 432–437). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the ‘neurds’: Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of human memory. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galton, F. (1865). Heredity talent and character. Macmillan's Magazine, 12, 157–166, 318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A., Cohen, M., Kim, J., & Gray, J. (2012). An explicit cue improves creative analogical reasoning. Intelligence, 40, 598–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. E., Fugelsang, J. A., Kraemer, D. J. M., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2010). Connecting long distance: Semantic distance in analogical reasoning modulates frontopolar cortex activity. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 70–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. E., Fugelsang, J. A., Kraemer, D. J. M., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2012). Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 38, 264–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A., Fugelsang, J., Kraemer, D., Shamosh, N., & Dunbar, K. (2006). The dynamic role of prefrontal cortex in reasoning and abstract thought. Brain Research, 1096, 125–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1994). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, M. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1998). Trends in Black–White test score differentials: II the WORDSUM vocabulary test. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures (pp. 303–332). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosz, A. F., Colflesh, G. J. H., & Wiley, J. (2012). Uncorking the muse: Alcohol intoxication facilitates creative problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 487–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios J., & Beaman M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhorta, N., Krosnick, J. A., & Haertel, E. (2007). The psychometric properties of the GSS Wordsum vocabulary test (GSS Methodology Report No. 111). Chicago, IL: NORC.
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouspensky, P. D. (1950). The psychology of man's possible evolution. New York, NY: Hedgehog Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 109–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2013a). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J., Barr, N., Koehler, D., & Fugelsang, J. (2013b). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 188–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J., Seli, P., Koehler, D., & Fugelsang, J. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel, A., Kohler, P. J., Fogelson, S. V., Alexander, P., Konuthula, D., & Tse, P. U. (2013). Network structure and dynamics of the mental workspace. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 16277–16282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966–972.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40, 343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2012). Fluid movement and creativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 625–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slepian, M. L., Weisbuch, M., Rutchick, A. M., Newman, L. S., & Ambady, N. (2010). Shedding light on insight: Priming bright ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 696–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellman, B. A., Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, R. G. (2001) Analogical priming via semantic relations. Memory and Cognition, 29, 383–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot's rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1275–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. (2012). Working memory capacity, attentional focus, and problem solving. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 258–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar