Contraries as an effective strategy in geometrical problem solving

REFERENCES

• Allison, P. (1984). Event history analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anolli, L., Antonietti, A., Cantoia, M., & Crisafulli, L. (2001). Accessing source information in analogical problem solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 237–261. doi:10.1080/02724980042000093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonietti, A. (2001). Analogical discoveries. Identifying similarities to solve problems. Rome: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Antonietti, A., Angelini, C., & Cerana, P. (1995). L'intuizione visiva [Visual intuition]. Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., Marsh, J. E., Litchfield, D., Cook, R. L, & Booth, N. (2014). When distraction helps: Evidence that concurrent articulation and irrelevant speech can facilitate insight problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 76–96. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2014.934399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., & Stevens, A. (2009). Evidence for a verbally-based analytic component to insight problem solving. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.). Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1060–1065). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014a). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package version 1.1-7). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014b). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. ArXiv e-print; submitted to Journal of Statistical Software. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, I., Burro, R., Torquati, S., & Savardi, U. (2013). The middle of the road: Perceiving intermediates. Acta Psychologica, 144, 121–135. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, I., & Savardi, U. (2008). The perception of contraries. Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, I., Savardi, U., & Burro R. (2011). Perceptual ratings of opposite spatial properties: Do they lie on the same dimension. Acta Psychologica, 138, 405–418. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, I., Savardi, U., Burro, R., & Martelli, M.F. (2014). Doing the opposite to what another person is doing. Acta Psychologica, 151, 117–133. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, I., Savardi, U., & Kubovy, M. (2011). Dimensions and their poles: A metric and topological approach to opposites. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1232–1265. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.520943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozzi, P. (1978). L'interosservazione come metodo per la fenomenologia sperimentale [Inter-observation as method for the experimental phenomenology]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 5, 229–239.
   Google Scholar
• Bozzi, P., & Martinuzzi, L. (1989). Un esperimento di interosservazione [An inter-observational experiment]. Rivista di psicologia, 1, 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Branchini, E., Burro, R., & Savardi, U. (2009). Contraries in productive thinking. In U. Savardi (Ed.), The perception and cognition of contraries (pp. 203–224). Milan: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Brem, S. K., & Rips, L. J. (2000). Explanation and evidence in informal argument. Cognitive Science, 24, 573–604 doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2404_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasola, M. (2008). The development of infants’ spatial categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 21–25. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasola, M., Cohen, L. B., & Chiarello, E. (2003). Six-month-old infants’ categorization of containment spatial relations. Child Development, 74, 679–693. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley, M. (2012). The R book. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crystall, D. (1985). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• De Bono, E. (1967). The use of lateral thinking. London: Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. J., & Barnett, A. (2008). An introduction to generalized linear models (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science.
   Google Scholar
• Duncker, K. (1926). A qualitative (experimental and theoretical) study in productive thinking (solving of comprehensible problems). Pedagogical Seminary, 33, 642–708. doi:10.1080/08856559.1926.10533052
   Google Scholar
• Duncker, K. (1935). Zur psychologie des productive denkes [The psychology of productive thinking]. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1–113. doi:10.1037/h0093599
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103–131. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-0400
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• St Evans, J. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• St Evans, J. B. T. (2014). Reasoning, biases and dual processes: The lasting impact of Wason's (1960) paper on the 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove). Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.914547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Evans, J. B. T., Handley, S. J., Harper, C. N. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Reasoning about necessity and possibility: A test of mental model theory of deduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1495–1513. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farris, H., & Revlin, R. (1989). Sensible reasoning in two tasks: Rule discovery and hypothesis evaluation. Memory & Cognition, 17, 221–232. doi:10.3758/BF03197071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 436–463. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.779248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2003). Facilitated rule discovery in Wason's 2-4-6 task: The role of negative triples. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 438–443). Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Dual-goal facilitation in Wason's 2-4-6 task: What mediates successful rule discovery? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 873–885. doi:10.1080/02724980543000051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2009). Exploring the determinants of dual goal facilitation in a rule discovery task. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 294–315. doi:10.1080/13546780903040666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2012). Contrast class cues and performance facilitation in a hypothesis-testing task: Evidence for an iterative counterfactual model. Memory & Cognition, 40, 408–419. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0159-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gärdenfors, P. (2014). The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giaquinto, M. (2007). Visual thinking in mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. (1993). Researching social life. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., & Henretty, N. (2010). Verbalization and problem solving: Insight and spatial factors. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 81–93. doi:10.1348/000712609×422656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgorio, N. (1998). Exploring the functionality of visual and non-visual strategies in solving rotation problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 207–231. doi:10.1023/A:1003132603649
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, M. E., Stafford, A., & Gorman, M. E. (1987). Disconfirmation and dual hypotheses on a more difficult version of Wason's 2–4–6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 1–28. doi:10.1080/02724988743000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1964). Creative thinking and problem solving. Education Digest, 29, 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: R. R. Knapp.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1971). The nature of human intelligence. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, A. (1996). Children's ability for using different plane representations of space figures. In A. R. Batturo (Ed.), New directions in geometry education (pp. 33–42). Brisbane: Centre for Mathematics and Science Education, Q.U.T.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, A., Pegg, J., & Lawrie, C. (2004). Characterization of students’ reasoning and proof abilities in 3-dimensional geometry. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 511–518. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/gutierre/archivos1/textospdf/GutPeggLaw04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harrower, M. R. (1932). Organization in higher mental processes. Psychologische Forschung, 17, 56–120.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P. G. (2006). Teaching geometry with problems: Negotiating instructional situations and mathematical tasks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 313–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R. R., & Lintern, G. (2006). Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 203–222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Human and machine thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Bara, B. G. (1984). Syllogistic inference. Cognition, 16(1), 1–61. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90035-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. (1991). Deduction. Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Wason, P. C. (1977). Introduction to hypotheses and theories. In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 257–273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., & Bills, C. (1998). Visualisation, imagery, and the development of geometrical reasoning. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 18, 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2002). Antonymy: A corpus-based perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Murphy, M. L., Paradis, C., & Willners, C. (2012). Antonyms in English: Construals, constructions, and canonicity. Studies in English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanizsa, G. (1973). Il problem solving nella psicologia della gestalt [Problem solving in gestalt psychology]. In G. Mosconi & V. D’Urso (Eds.), La soluzione dei problemi [Problem solving] (pp. 35–86). Florence: Giunti Barbera.
   Google Scholar
• Kareev, Y., Halberstadt, N., & Shafir, D. (1993). Improving performance and increasing the use of non-positive testing in a rule-discovery task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 729–742. doi:10.1080/14640749308401036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1989). Hypothesis testing in rule discovery: Strategy, structure and content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 596–604. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1000–1009. doi:10.3758/BF03195762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan, N. (1971). Educational implications in cognitive styles. In G. S. Lesser (Ed.), Psychology and educational practice (pp. 242–292). Glenview, IL: Scott & Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. London: Kegan, Trench.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, W. (1969). The task of gestalt psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kubovy, M. (2002). Phenomenology, cognitive. In L. Nadel (Eds.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 579–586). London, UK: Nature Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Núnez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, M. (1988). Effective problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54, 1–95. doi:10.1037/h0093502
   Google Scholar
• Luchins, A. S. (1946). Classroom Experiments on Mental Set. The American Journal of Psychology, 59, 295–298. doi:10.2307/1416894
   Google Scholar
• Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1950). New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving. Journal of General Psychology, 42, 279–297. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1950.9920160
   Google Scholar
• Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1970a). Wertheimer's seminars revisited problem solving and thinking (Vol. I). New York, NY: State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1970b). Wertheimer's seminars revisited problem solving and thinking (Vol. II). New York, NY: State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1970c). Wertheimer's seminars revisited problem solving and thinking (Vol. III). New York, NY: State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, J., Niki, K., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Perceptual contributions to problem solving: Chunk decomposition of Chinese characters. Brain Research Bulletin, 70, 430–443. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mach, E. (1905). Erkenntnis und irrutum [Knowledge and error]. Leipzing: Barth.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, N. F. R. (1930). Reasoning in humans. On direction. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 10, 115–143. doi:10.1037/h0073232
   Google Scholar
• Maier, N. F. R. (1931a). Reasoning and learning. Psychological Review, 38, 332–346. doi:10.1037/h0069991
   Google Scholar
• Maier, N. F. R. (1931b). Reasoning in humans. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181–194. doi:10.1037/h0071361
   Google Scholar
• Maier, N. F. R. (1945). Reasoning in humans. The mechanisms of equivalent stimuli and of reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 35, 349–360. doi:10.1037/h0053960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232. doi:10.1037/h0048850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reasons? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111. doi:10.1017/S0140525×10000968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Baugham, W. A., & Marks, M. A. (1994). Creativity and problem solving: Cognition, adaptability, and wisdom. Roeper Review, 16, 241–246. doi:10.1080/02783199409553589
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, L. (2003). Semantic relations and lexicons: Antonyms, synonyms and other semantic paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nerney, G. (1979). The gestalt of problem solving: An interpretation of Max Wertheimer's productive thinking. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 10, 56–80. doi:10.1163/156916279×00059
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1962). The process of creative thinking. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M. (2002). Contrast classes and matching bias as explanations of the effects of negation on conditional reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 135–151. doi:10.1080/13546780143000170
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). Another look at eliminative and enumerative behaviour in a conceptual task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 149–169. doi:10.1080/09541449408520141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Stenning, K. (1992). Reasoning with conditionals containing negated constituents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 835–854. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. Keane & K. Gilhooley (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking (pp. 1–44). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Investigating the effect of mental set on insight problem solving. Experimental Psychology, 55, 269–282. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Paradis, J. Hudson, & U. Magnusson (Eds.) (2013). The construal of spatial meaning: Windows into conceptual space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, C., & Willners, C. (2011). Antonymy: From convention to meaning-making. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 367–391. doi: 10.1075/rcl.9.2.02par
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. (1985). The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision-making and system-management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15, 234–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J., Petersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J., Petersen, A. M., & Schmidt, K. (1990). Taxonomy for cognitive work analysis. Denmark: Risø National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Savardi, U., & Bianchi, I. (2009). The spatial path to contrariety. In U. Savardi (Ed.), The perception and cognition of contraries (pp. 66–92). Milan: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Savardi, U., Bianchi, I., & Bertamini, M. (2010). Naive prediction of orientation and motion in mirrors. From what we see to what we expect reflections to do. Acta Psychologica, 134, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25, 359–393. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, D. D. (1986). A philosophical and empirical analysis of subjects’ modes of inquiry in Wason's 2–4–6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 5–33. doi:10.1080/14640748608401583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., Worner, W. J., Pliske, D. B., Mynatt, C. R., Gross, K. A., & Arkkelin, D. L. (1980). Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 109–123. doi:10.1080/00335558008248237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unal, H., Jakubowski, E., & Corey, D. (2009). Differences in learning geometry among high and low spatial ability pre-service mathematics teachers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40, 997–1012. doi:10.1080/00207390902912852
   Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Austin, N. G., & Rankin, S. (1995). Inducing a rule in Wason's 2–4–6 task: A test of the information-quantity and goal-complementarity hypotheses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 895–914. doi:10.1080/14640749508401422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Payton, T. (2008). Graphical representation fosters discovery in the 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 625–640. doi:10.1080/17470210701268039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2003). Creativity and inductive reasoning: The relationship between divergent thinking and performance on Wason's 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 56, 641–655. doi:10.1080/02724980244000567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140. doi:10.1080/17470216008416717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York, NY: Harper. First appearance Über Schluzbprozesse in productiven Denken, 1919.
   Google Scholar
• Wharton, C. M., Cheng, P. W., & Wickens, T. D. (1993). Hypothesis testing strategies: Why two goals are better than one. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 743–758. doi:10.1080/14640749308401037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L., Knoblich, G., & Luo, J. (2013). The role of chunk tightness and chunk familiarity in problem solving: Evidence from ERPs and FMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 1173–1186. doi:10.1002/hbm.21501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingales, M. (1974). L'organizzazione della creatività [The organization of creativity]. Bologna: Cappelli.
   Google Scholar