Patterns and evolution of moral behaviour: moral dynamics in everyday life

References

• Albarracín, D., & Wyer, R. S. (2000). The cognitive impact of past behavior: Influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, L., & Moore, M. (2008). Deontological ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1962). Performance expectancy as a determinant of actual performance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 178–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high- quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 318–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway & Peetz (2012). When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 907–919.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, G., Bashshur, R. M., Rode, J., & Le Menestrel, M. (2013). Rules or Consequences? The role of ethical mind-sets in moral dynamics. Psychological Science, 24, 482–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, R. D., & Dempsey, C. B. (1979). Blood donation and the foot-in-the-door technique: A limiting case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 580–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneezy, A., Imas, A., Brown, A., Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58, 179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, J., Mullen, E., & Murninghan, J. K. (2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 701–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klass, E. T. (1978). Psychological effects of immoral actions: The experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 756–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, A., Effron, D., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 344–357.
   Google Scholar
• Monin, B., & Jordan, A. H. (2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. In D. Narvaez & D. K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 341–354). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S. (2004). A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 1044–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisan, M. (1991). The moral balance model: Theory and research extending our understanding of moral choice and deviation. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 3, 213–250). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, A., II, Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71, 178–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners. Psychological Science, 20, 523–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1991). A companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2008). Consequentialism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/
   Google Scholar
• Szekely, R. D., & Miu, A. C. (2014). Incidental emotions in moral dilemmas: The influence of emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion, 29, 64–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., & Batson, C. D. (1981). Effect of helping under normative pressure on self-perceived altruism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 127–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 476–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, C.-B., Liljenquist, K., & Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation: Licensing and compensation. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 75–89). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar