Negativity bias in defeasible reasoning

References

• Aloise, P. A. (1993). Trait confirmation and disconfirmation: The development of attribution biases. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 177–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashare, R. L., Norris, C. J., Wileyto, E. P., Cacioppo, J. T., & Strasser, A. A. (2013). Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias: Gender-specific associations with two serotonin receptor genes. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 469–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atthowe, J. M. (1960). Types of conflict and their resolution: A reinterpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blanchette, I. (2006). The effect of emotion on interpretation and logic in a conditional reasoning task. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1112–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette, I. (2014.). Emotion and reasoning. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchette, I., & Leese, J. (2010). The effect of negative emotion on deductive reasoning: Examining the contribution of physiological arousal. Experimental Psychology, 58, 235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnefon, J.-F. (2009). A theory of utility conditionals: Paralogical reasoning from decision-theoretic leakage. Psychological Review, 116, 888–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnefon, J.-F. (2010). Deduction from if-then personality signatures. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnefon, J.-F., Haigh, M., & Steward, A. J. (2013). Utility templates for the interpretation of conditional statements. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 350–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnefon, J.-F., Hilton, D. J. (2004). Consequential conditionals: Invited and suppressed inferences from valued outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 28–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 221–235). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J. (1989). Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. Cognition, 31, 61–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system: Architecture and operating characteristics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 133–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D., & Chua, F. (1994). Suppression of valid inferences: syntactic views, mental models, and relative salience. Cognition, 53, 217–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D. (1995). Naive theories and causal deduction. Memory & Cognition, 23, 646–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O., & Rist, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory & Cognition, 19, 274–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeure, V., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Raufaste, E. (2009). Politeness and conditional reasoning: Interpersonal cues to the indirect suppression of deductive inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2002). Causal conditional reasoning and semantic memory retrieval: A test of the semantic memory framework. Memory & Cognition, 30, 908–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2003a). Inference suppression and semantic memory retrieval: Every counterexample counts. Memory & Cognition, 31, 581–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2003b). Causal conditional reasoning and strength of association: The disabling condition case. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Dieussaert, K., De Neys, W., & Schaeken, W. (2005). Suppression and belief revision, two sides of the same coin? Psychologica Belgica, 45, 29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 978–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (2012). Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 18, 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Over, D. E. (2003). Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 29, 321–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, D. J., Jaspars, J. M. F., & Clarke, D. D. (1990). Pragmatic conditional reasoning: Context and content effects on the interpretation of causal assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 791–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikegami, T. (1993). Positive-negative asymmetry of priming effects on the impression Formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, T. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2005). Variations on human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, T. A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Lang, P. J. (1998). Eliciting affect using the International Affective Picture System: Bivariate evaluation and ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 855–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109, 636–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, N., Wranke, C., Hamburger, K., & Knauff, M. (2014). How emotions affect logical reasoning: Evidence from experiments with mood-manipulated participants, spider phobics, and people with exam anxiety. Frontiers in Emotion Science, 5, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D, & Tversky, A. (1983). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R. (1972). Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 47–62). Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Leiner, D. J. (2014). SoSci Survey (Version 2.4.00-i) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.soscisurvey.de
   Google Scholar
• Lewicka, M., Czapinski, J., & Peeters, G. (1992). Positive-negative asymmetry or ‘When the heart needs a reason’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1991). Social rules and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals. Cognition, 39, 85–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., Fleury, M.-L., Quinn, S., & Venet, M. (1998). The development of conditional reasoning and the structure of semantic memory. Child Development, 69, 742–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., & Potvin, F. (2001). Suppression of valid inferences and knowledge structures: The curious effect of producing alternative antecedents on reasoning with causal conditionals. Memory & Cognition, 29, 736–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, C. J., Larsen, J. T., Crawford, L. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). Better (or worse) for some than others: Individual differences in the positivity offset and negativity bias. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 100–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1995). Theories of reasoning and the computational explanation of everyday inference. Thinking & Reasoning, 1, 121–152.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2001). The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2003a). Probabilities and pragmatics in conditional inference: Suppression and order effects. In D. Hardman, & L. Macchi (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making (pp. 95–122). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2003b). Conditional probability and the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Mind & Language, 18, 359–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., Chater, N., & Larkin, J. (2000). Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 883–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Over, D. E., Hadjichristidis, C., Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Sloman, S. A. (2007). The probability of causal conditionals. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 62–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Politzer, G. (2007). Reasoning with conditionals. Topoi, 26, 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, S., & Markovits, H. (1998). Conditional reasoning, causality and the structure of semantic memory: Strength of association as a predictive factor for content effects. Cognition, 68, B93–B101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skowronski, J. J. and Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 383–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschueren, N., Peeters, G., & Schaeken, W. (2006). Don't let anything bad happen: The effect of consequence valence on conditional reasoning. Current Psychology Letters, 20, 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Weidenfeld, A., Oberauer, K., & Hörnig, R. (2005). Causal and noncausal conditionals: An integrated model of interpretation and reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1479–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S., & Hinkle, R. L. (1976). Informational factors underlying inferences about hypothetical persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 481–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar