Confidence judgments in syllogistic reasoning: the role of consistency and response cardinality

References

• Ackerman, R. (2014). The Diminishing Criterion Model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1349–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. (2015). Meta-reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory. In A. Feeney & V. Thompson ( Eds.), Reasoning as Memory (pp. 164–182). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. (2017). Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 607–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara, B., Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1995). The development of syllogistic reasoning. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 157–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. S., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In L. Reder ( Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 309–338). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., & Sampaio, C. (2006). Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition: A metamemory approach. Memory, 14, 540–552.[Cros0sRef]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., & Sampaio, C. (2012). The metamemory approach to confidence: A test using semantic memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., Sampaio, C., & Barlow, M. R. (2005). Confidence and accuracy in the recall of deceptive and non-deceptive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 618–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Strategies in syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23, 247–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1999). The probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 191–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17, 428–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Franssens, S. (2009). Belief inhibition during thinking: Not always winning but at least taking part. Cognition, 113, 45–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Cromheeke, S., & Osman, M. (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS ONE, 6, e15954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, C., Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2010). Assessing the belief bias with ROCs: It's a response bias effect. Psychological Review, 117(3), 831–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Frankish, K. (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., Harper, C. N. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Reasoning about necessity and possibility: A test of the mental model theory of deduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1495–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts, B. (2003). Reasoning with quantifiers. Cognition, 86, 223–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., Logie, R. H., & Wynn, V. (1999). Syllogistic reasoning tasks, working memory and skill. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 473–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (2016). Greater response cardinality indirectly reduces confidence. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 496–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Steedman, M. J. (1978). The psychology of syllogisms. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 64–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012). Theories of the syllogism: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 427–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., & Singmann, H. (2013). Does logic feel good? Testing for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1265–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., Musch, J., & Naumer, B. (2000). On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review, 107, 852–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson ( Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2008). Subjective confidence in one's answers: The consensuality principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2012). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119, 80–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Adiv, S. (2016). The self-consistency theory of subjective confidence. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber ( Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 127–147). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one's forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1133–1145.
   Google Scholar
• Mata, A., Ferreira, M. B., & Sherman, S. J. (2013). The metacognitive advantage of deliberative thinkers: A dual-process perspective on overconfidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 353–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Metacognition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsanyi, K., & Handley, S. J. (2012). Logic feels so good – I like it! Evidence for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 596–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower ( Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125–169). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2010). Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Psychological Review, 117(3), 864–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prowse Turner, A., J., & Thompson, V. A. (2009). The role of training, alternative models, and logical necessity in determining confidence in syllogistic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 69–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quayle, J. D., & Ball, L. J. (2000). Working memory, metacognitive uncertainty and belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1202–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2009). Modelling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(5), 1317–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (1994). Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura ( Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 93–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shynkaruk, J. M., & Thompson, V. A. (2006). Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 34, 619–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J., (2005). Judgments of learning: Evidence for a two-stage model. Memory & Cognition, 33(6), 1116–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational?: Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Stupple, E. J. N., & Ball, L. J. (2014). The intersection between Descriptivism and Meliorism in reasoning research: Further proposals in support of ‘soft normativism’. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1269), 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stupple, E. J. N., Ball, L. J., & Ellis, D. (2013). Matching bias in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence for a dual process account from response times and confidence ratings. Thinking & Reasoning, 19(1), 54–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. J. (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 215–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., & Morsanyi, K. (2012). Analytic thinking: Do you feel like it? Mind & Society, 11(1), 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar