Does “putting on your thinking cap” reduce myside bias in evaluation of scientific evidence?

References

• Attridge, N., & Inglis, M. (2015). Increasing cognitive inhibition with a difficult prior task: implications for mathematical thinking. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47 (5), 723–734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0656-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. (2006). What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 147–168. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.336.What
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W. (2009). The evolution of public understanding of science–discourse and comparative evidence. Science Technology & Society, 14(2), 221–240. http://doi.org/10.1177/097172180901400202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79–95. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584. http://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.63.4.568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2017a). Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(36), 9587–9592. doi:10.1073/pnas.1704882114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2017b). Development and validation of the scientific reasoning scale. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(1), 26–38. doi:10.1002/bdm.1906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255–278. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685 doi:10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Neilens, H., & Over, D. (2010). The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 892–909. doi:10.1080/17470210903111821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 422–444). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1983). Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psychological Review, 90(3), 239–260. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. http://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732 doi:10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, C., & Rainie, L. (2015). Public and scientists’ views on science and society. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from the Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S. P., & Maheswaran, D. (2000). Motivated reasoning: A depth of processing perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 358–371. http://doi.org/10.1086/209568 doi:10.1086/209568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited□: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics of intuitive judgment: Extensions and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004
   Google Scholar
• Kotagal, M., Carle, A., Kessler, L., & Flum, D. (2014). Limited impact on health and access to care for 19- to 25-year- olds following the patient protection and affordable care act. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(11), 1023–1029. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1208 doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.3.480 doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 37–44. http://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X0102100105 doi:10.1177/0272989X0102100105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.11.2098 doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., Shwom, R. L., Brechin, S. R., & Allen, S. (2016). Ideology, capitalism, and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 21, 180–189. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. doi:10.1037/a0028085 doi:10.1037/a0028085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). How can decision making be improved? Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 4(4), 379–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13(3), 273–294. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504044908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. A., Swift, S. A., Minster, A., Mellers, B., Ungar, L., Tetlock, P., … Tenney, E. R. (2017). Confidence calibration in a multiyear geopolitical forecasting competition. Management Science, 63(11), 3552–3565. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morewedge, C. K., Yoon, H., Scopelliti, I., Symborski, C. W., Korris, J. H., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Debiasing decisions: Improved decision making with a single training intervention. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 129–140. http://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600886 doi:10.1177/2372732215600886
   Google Scholar
• Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(1), 85–95. doi:10.1080/00335557743000053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Dieckmann, N., Dixon, A., Hibbard, J. H., & Mertz, C. K. (2007). Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Medical Care Research and Review, 64(2), 169–190. http://doi.org/10.1177/10775587070640020301 doi:10.1177/10775587070640020301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, B. D., Buchmueller, T., Decker, S. L., Carey, C., & Kronick, R. (2013). The affordable care act has led to significant gains in health insurance and access to care for young adults. Health Affairs, 32(1), 165–174. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0552 doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 94(4), 672–695. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. doi:10.1177/0963721413480174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Associations between myside bias on an informal reasoning task and amount of post-secondary education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(7), 851–860. doi:10.1002/acp.915 doi:10.1002/acp.915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. R., & Britt, M. A. (2008). The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation. Thinking and Reasoning, 14(1), 1–27. http://doi.org/10.1080/13546780701527674 doi:10.1080/13546780701527674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183–209. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309333019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar