Conditionals and inferential connections: toward a new semantics^*

References

• Adams, E. W. (1965). The logic of conditionals. Inquiry, 8(1–4), 166–197. doi:10.1080/00201746508601430
   Google Scholar
• Adams, E. W. (1966). Probability and the logic of conditionals. In J. Hintikka & P. Suppes (Eds.), Aspects of inductive logic (pp. 265–316). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, E. W. (1975). The logic of conditionals. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, E. W. (1998). A primer of probability logic. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, E. W., & Levine, H. P. (1975). On the uncertainties transmitted from premises to conclusions in deductive inferences. Synthese, 30(3–4), 429–460. doi:10.1007/BF00485053
   Google Scholar
• Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Baratgin, J., & Politzer, G. (2016). Logic, probability and inference: a methodology for a new paradigm. In L. Macchi, M. Bagassi, & R. Viale (Eds.), Cognitive unconscious and human rationality (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baratgin, J., Politzer, G., Over, D. E., & Takahashi, T. (2018). The psychology of uncertainty and three-valued truth tables. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1479.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2003). A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey, S. (1986). Partial logic. In D. M. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic, Vol. III (pp. 1–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Braine, M. D. S. (1978). On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic. Psychological Review, 85(1), 1–21. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braine, M. D., & O’Brien, D. P. (1991). A theory of if: Lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles. Psychological Review, 98(2), 182–203. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.98.2.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, J. P. (2004). Review of J. Bennett, A philosophical guide to conditionals. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 10(4), 565–570. doi:10.1017/S1079898600003632
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, N., Baratgin, J., Oaksford, M., & Over, D. E. (2015). Bayesian reasoning with ifs and ands and ors. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 192. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, N., Over, D. E., Oaksford, M., & Baratgin, J. (2016). Centering and the meaning of conditionals. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1104–1109). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• de Finetti, B. (1995). The logic of probability. Philosophical Studies, 77(1), 181–190. doi:10.1007/BF00996317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douven, I. (2008). The evidential support theory of conditionals. Synthese, 164(1), 19–44. doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9214-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douven, I. (2011). Indicative conditionals. In L. Horsten & R. Pettigrew (Eds.), A companion to philosophical logic (pp. 383–405). London: Continuum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douven, I. (2016a). The epistemology of indicative conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douven, I. (2016b). On de Finetti on iterated conditionals. In C. Beierle, G. Brewka, & M. Thimm (Eds.), Computational models of rationality (pp. 265–279). London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Douven, I. (2017). How to account for the oddness of missing-link conditionals. Synthese, 194(5), 1541–1554. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0756-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douven, I., Elqayam, S., Singmann, H., & van Wijnbergen-Huitink, J. (2018). Conditionals and inferential connections: A hypothetical inferential theory. Cognitive Psychology, 101, 50–81. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douven, I., & Verbrugge, S. (2010). The Adams family. Cognition, 117(3), 302–318. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douven, I., & Verbrugge, S. (2013). The probabilities of conditionals revisited. Cognitive Science, 37(4), 711–730. doi:10.1111/cogs.12025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgington, D. (1992). Validity, uncertainty and vagueness. Analysis, 52(4), 193–204. doi:10.1093/analys/52.4.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgington, D. (1995). On conditionals. Mind, 104(414), 235–329. doi:10.1093/mind/104.414.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgington, D. (1997). Vagueness by degrees. In R. Keefe & P. Smith (Eds.), Vagueness: A reader (pp. 294–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edgington, D. (2003). What if? Questions about conditionals. Mind & Language, 18, 380–401. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elqayam, S., & Over, D. E. (2013). New paradigm psychology of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 249–265. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.841591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic–analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 378–395. doi:10.3758/BF03193858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11, 295–306. doi:10.3758/BF03196976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Over, D. E. (2003). Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 321–355. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2013). Reasoning to and from belief: Deduction and induction are still distinct. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 267–283. doi:10.1080/13546783.2012.745450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Thomspon, V. A., & Over, D. E. (2015). Uncertain deduction and conditional reasoning. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugard, A., Pfeifer, N., Mayerhofer, B., & Kleiter, G. (2011). How people interpret conditionals: Shifts toward the conditional event. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 635–648. doi:10.1037/a0022329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzo Castañeda, L. E., & Knauff, M. (2019). The specificity of terms affects conditional reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 25, 72–93. doi:10.1080/13546783.2018.1467343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbard, A. (1981). Two recent theories of conditionals. In W. Harper, R. Stalnaker, & G. Pearce (Eds.), Ifs (pp. 211–247). Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Gilio, A., & Over, D. E. (2012). The psychology of inferring conditionals from disjunctions: A probabilistic study. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(2), 118–131. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilio, A., & Sanfilippo, G. (2013). Conjunction, disjunction and iterated conditioning of conditional events. In R. Kruse, M. R. Berthold, C. Moewes, & M. A. Gil (Eds.), Synergies of soft computing and statistics for intelligent data analysis (pp. 399–407). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gilio, A., & Sanfilippo, G. (2014). Conditional random quantities and compounds of conditionals. Studia Logica, 102(4), 709–729. doi:10.1007/s11225-013-9511-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilio, A., Over, D. E., Pfeifer, N., & Sanfilippo, G. (2017). Centering and compound conditionals under coherence. In M. B. Ferraro, P. Giordani, B. Vantaggi, M. Gagolewski, M. A. Gil, P. Grzegorzewski, & O. Hryniewicz (Eds.), Soft methods for data science (pp. 253–260). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1989). Indicative conditionals. In Studies in the way of words (pp. 58–85). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, F. (1979). On assertion and indicative conditionals. Philosophical Review, 88(4), 565–589. doi:10.2307/2184845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, F. (1987). Conditionals. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, R., & Edgington, D. (1991). Matter of fact conditionals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 65(1), 161–183. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/65.1.161
   Google Scholar
• Kneale, W., & Kneale, M. (1962). The development of logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (1986). Conditionals. In A. M. Farley & K. E. McCollough (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on pragmatics and grammatical theory (pp. 115–135). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (1991). Conditionals. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung/Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 651–656). Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowska, K., & Douven, I. (2018). Missing-link conditionals: pragmatically infelicitous or semantically defective?. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15(2), 191–211. doi:10.1515/ip-2018-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowska, K. H., Collins, P. J., & Hahn, U. (2017). Between a conditional’s antecedent and its consequent: Discourse coherence vs. probabilistic relevance. Cognition, 164, 199–205. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowska, K. H., Wenmackers, S., & Douven, I. (2014). Rethinking Gibbard’s riverboat argument. Studia Logica, 102(4), 771–792. doi:10.1007/s11225-013-9507-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. K. (1975). Adverbs of quantification. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 169–218). Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. K. (1976). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. Philosophical Review, 85(3), 297–315. doi:10.2307/2184045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. K. (1979). Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 13(4), 455–476. doi:10.2307/2215339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. K. (1981). Ordering semantics and premise semantics for counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 10, 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycan, W. G. (2001). Real conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, J. (2012). Relativism. In D. Graff Fara & G. Russell (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the philosophy of language (pp. 132–142). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. L. (1973). Truth, probability and paradox: Studies in philosophical logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., de Chantal, P.-L., & Brisson, J. (2019). Abstract reasoning and the interpretation of basic conditionals. Thinking & Reasoning, 25, 1–13. doi:10.1080/13546783.2018.1452795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, D. (1982). Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mates, B. (1953). Stoic logic. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, M. (1996). On the truth conditions of certain “if”-sentences. Philosophical Review, 105(1), 1–37. doi:10.2307/2185762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, V. (1985). A counterexample to modus ponens. Journal of Philosophy, 82(9), 462–471. doi:10.2307/2026276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merin, A. (2007). Unconditionals (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WUwZTk5M/unconditionals.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1872). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive (8th ed.). London: Longmans, Green, Reader, & Dyer. (Original work published 1843)
   Google Scholar
• Milne, P. (2012). Indicative conditionals, conditional probabilities, and the “defective truth-table”: A request for more experiments. Thinking & Reasoning, 18, 196–224. doi:10.1080/13546783.2012.670754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (2015). Conditional reasoning: The unruly syntactics, semantics, thematics, and pragmatics of “if”. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S., Barch, D. H., & Butler, S. F. (2019). Evaluating conditional arguments with uncertain premises. Thinking & Reasoning, 25, 48–71. doi:10.1080/13546783.2018.1465474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2003). Conditional probability and the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Mind & Language, 18, 359–379. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., Weidenfeld, A., & Fischer, K. (2007). What makes us believe a conditional? The roles of covariation and causality. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 340–369. doi:10.1080/13546780601035794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Over, D. E., & Baratgin, J. (2017). The “defective” truth table: Its past, present, and future. In N. Galbraith, D. E. Over, & E. Lucas (Eds.), The thinking mind: The use of thinking in everyday life (pp. 15–28). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Over, D. E., & Cruz, N. (2018). Probabilistic accounts of conditional reasoning. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), International handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 434–450). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Over, D. E., Douven, I., & Verbrugge, S. (2013). Scope ambiguities and conditionals. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 284–307. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.810172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Over, D. E., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). The probability of conditionals: The psychological evidence. Mind & Language, 18, 340–358. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Over, D. E., Evans, J. S. B. T., & Elqayam, S. (2010). Conditionals and non-constructive reasoning. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Cognition and conditionals: Probability and logic in human thinking (pp. 135–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Over, D. E., Hadjichristidis, C., Evans, J., St, B. T., Handley, S. J., & Sloman, S. A. (2007). The probability of causal conditionals. Cognitive Psychology, 54(1), 62–97. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N., & Douven, I. (2014). Formal epistemology and the new paradigm psychology of reasoning. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 5(2), 199–221. doi:10.1007/s13164-013-0165-0
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N., & Kleiter, G. D. (2010). The conditional in mental probability logic. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Cognition and conditionals: Probability and logic in human thinking (pp. 153–173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Politzer, G., Over, D. E., & Baratgin, J. (2010). Betting on conditionals. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 172–197. doi:10.1080/13546783.2010.504581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. P. (1990). General propositions and causality. In his Philosophical Papers, edited by D. H. Mellor (pp. 145–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Original work published 1929.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (2007). Conditionals. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, A. (2006). A simple theory of conditionals. Analysis, 66(3), 233–240. doi:10.1093/analys/66.3.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, A. (2013). Conditionals are material: The positive arguments. Synthese, 190(15), 3161–3174. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0134-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieskamp, J. (2008). The probabilistic nature of preferential choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1446–1465. doi:10.1037/a0013646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(2), 207–236. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothschild, D. (2014). Capturing the relationship between conditionals and conditional probability with a trivalent semantics. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 24(1–2), 144–152. doi:10.1080/11663081.2014.911535
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, D. H. (1989). If P, then Q. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, S. (2003). The things we mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Self, S. G., & Liang, K. (1987). Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398), 605–610. doi:10.2307/2289471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., & Kellen, D. (2013). MPTinR: Analysis of multinomial processing tree models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 560–575. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0259-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Klauer, K. C., & Over, D. E. (2014). New normative standards of conditional reasoning and the dual-source model. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skorupski, J. (1989). John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skovgaard-Olsen, N. (2016a). Ranking theory and conditional reasoning. Cognitive Science, 40(4), 848–880. doi:10.1111/cogs.12267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovgaard-Olsen, N. (2016b). Motivating the relevance approach to conditionals. Mind & Language, 31, 555–579. doi:10.1111/mila.12120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovgaard-Olsen, N., Singmann, H., & Klauer, K. C. (2016). The relevance effect and conditionals. Cognition, 150, 26–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, W. (2013). A ranking-theoretic approach to conditionals. Cognitive Science, 37(6), 1074–1106. doi:10.1111/cogs.12057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, W. (2015). Conditionals: A unifying ranking-theoretic perspective. Philosophers’ Imprint, 15, 1–30. hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0015.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Studies in logical theory (pp. 98–112). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1975). Indicative conditionals. Philosophia, 5(3), 269–286. doi:10.1007/BF02379021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59, 320–344. doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320
   Google Scholar
• van Wijnbergen-Huitink, J., Elqayam, S., & Over, D. E. (2015). The probability of iterated conditionals. Cognitive Science, 39(4), 788–803. doi:10.1111/cogs.12169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, M., & Baratgin, J. (2017). A psychological study of unconnected conditionals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(6), 769–781. doi:10.1080/20445911.2017.1305388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weirich, K. (in press). Defending truth values for indicative conditionals. Philosophical Studies.
   Google Scholar