The relation between semantic memory structure, associative abilities, and verbal and figural creativity

References

• Abraham, A., Rutter, B., Bantin, T., & Hermann, C. (2018). Creative conceptual expansion: A combined fMRI replication and extension study to examine individual differences in creativity. Neuropsychologia, 118(Pt A), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2019). Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, A. P., & Thomas, K. E. (2011). A dual process account of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.571183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz-Zadeh, L., Liew, S.-L., & Dandekar, F. (2013). Exploring the neural correlates of visual creativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Lorch, R. F. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12(3), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baronchelli, A., Ferrer-I-Cancho, R., Pastor-Satorras, R., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2013). Networks in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(7), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.895915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5, 10964https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative over time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1186–1197. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckage, N., Smith, L., & Hills, T. T. (2011). Small worlds and semantic network growth in typical and late talkers. PLoS One, 6(5), e19348https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Kenett, Y. N., Umdasch, K., Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2017). How semantic memory structure and intelligence contribute to creative thought: a network science approach. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(2), 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2016.1278034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Könen, T., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Associative abilities underlying creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., Kenett, Y. N., Ovando-Tellez, M. P., Benedek, M., & Volle, E. (2019). Building individual semantic networks and exploring thei relationship with creativity. Paper presented at the The 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Socie, Montreal QB, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., & Hwang, D. U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424(4-5), 175–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Beaty, R. E., Cui, Z., Sun, J., He, H., Zhuang, K., Ren, Z., Liu, G., & Qiu, J. (2019). Brain hemispheric involvement in visuospatial and verbal divergent thinking. NeuroImage, 202, 116065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. P., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2019). Executive and default network connectivity reflects conceptual interference during creative imagery generation. PsyArXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, E. G., & Thompson‐Schill, S. L. (2011). Dissociable brain states linked to common and creative object use. Human Brain Mapping, 32(4), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, A. C., Gleitman, L. R., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2007). Effect of congenital blindness on the semantic representation of some everyday concepts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(20), 8241–8246. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702812104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forthmann, B., Gerwig, A., Holling, H., Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The be-creative effect in divergent thinking: The interplay of instruction and object frequency. Intelligence, 57, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forthmann, B., Oyebade, O., Ojo, A., Günther, F., & Holling, H. (2019). Application of latent semantic analysis to divergent thinking is biased by elaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3-5), 75–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the “Neurds”: Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and Ddynamics of memory. Creatvity Research Journal, 22(1), 1–13. i https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903579494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., Anderson, S., Chen, E. E., Kelly, J. M., Christian, M. S., Patrick, J., Huang, L., Kenett, Y. N., & Lewis, K. (2019). "Forward flow": A new measure to quantify free thought and predict creativity”: . The American Psychologist, 74(5), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. E. (2016). Creativity, within reason: Semantic distance and dynamic state creativity in relational thinking and reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415618485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J. M., Fugelsang, J. A., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2010). Connecting long distance: Semantic distance in analogical reasoning modulates frontopolar cortex activity. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991)), 20(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel, R., & Schmittmann, V. D. (2006). The 20-minute version as a predictor of the raven advanced progressive matrices test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 1039–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406288169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hass, R. W. (2017a). Semantic search during divergent thinking. Cognition, 166, 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hass, R. W. (2017b). Tracking the dynamics of divergent thinking via semantic distance: Analytic methods and theoretical implications. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0659-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, D. J. P., & Johnson, D. R. (2018). Semantic distance: An automated measure of creativity that is novel and appropriate. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henley, N. M. (1969). A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80058-7
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Structural Equation Modeling in the Communication Sciences, 1995–2000. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00822.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research. (pp. 195–222): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, P., Qiu, L., Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Song, Z., Qi, Z., Gong, Q., & Xie, P. (2013). Evidence for a left-over-right inhibitory mechanism during figural creative thinking in healthy nonartists. Human Brain Mapping, 34(10), 2724–2732. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauk, E. (2019). A bio-psycho-behavioral model of creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41(4), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karuza, E. A., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Bassett, D. S. (2016). Local patterns to global architectures: Influences of network topology on human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N. (2018a). Going the extra creative mile: The role of semantic distance in creativity – theory, research, and measurement. In R. E. Jung & O. Vartanian (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (pp. 233–248). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N. (2018b). Investigating creativity from a semantic network perspective. In Z. Kapoula, E. Volle, J. Renoult, & M. Andreatta (Eds.), Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences (pp. 49–75). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N. (2019). What can quantitative measures of semantic distance tell us about creativity?. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014). Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(407), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., Austerweil, J. L. (2016). Examining search processes in low and high creative individuals with random walks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2016). Structure and flexibility: Investigating the relation between the structure of the mental lexicon, fluid intelligence, and creative achievement. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., & Faust, M. (2019). A semantic network cartography of the creative mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(4), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., Levi, E., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2017). The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(9), 1470–1489. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., Levy, O., Kenett, D. Y., Stanley, H. E., Faust, M., & Havlin, S. (2018). Flexibility of thought in high creative individuals represented by percolation analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(5), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717362115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., Medaglia, J. D., Beaty, R. E., Chen, Q., Betzel, R. F., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Qiu, J. (2018). Driving the brain towards creativity and intelligence: A network control theory analysis. Neuropsychologia, 118(Pt A), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleinmintz, O. M., Abecasis, D., Tauber, A., Geva, A., Chistyakov, A. V., Kreinin, I., Klein, E., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2018). Participation of the left inferior frontal gyrus in human originality. Brain Structure & Function, 223(1), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1500-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinmintz, O. M., Ivancovsky, T., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2019). The twofold model of creativity: the neural underpinnings of the generation and evaluation of creative ideas. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kowatari, Y., Lee, S. H., Yamamura, H., Nagamori, Y., Levy, P., Yamane, S., & Yamamoto, M. (2009). Neural networks involved in artistic creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 30(5), 1678–1690. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegeskorte, N., & Mur, M. (2012). Inverse MDS: Inferring dissimilarity structure from multiple item arrangements. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(245), 245https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latora, V., & Marchiori, M. (2001). Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical review letters, 87(19), 198701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Yang, J., Zhang, Q., Li, G., & Qiu, J. (2016). The association between resting functional connectivity and visual creativity. Scientific Reports, 6, 25395https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Psychology), 68(8), 1623–1642. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.988735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S., A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Paper presented at the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(23), 8577–8582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: What instructing people to “be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmiero, M., Giulianella, L., Guariglia, P., Boccia, M., D'Amico, S., & Piccardi, L. (2019). The dancers’ visuospatial body map explains their enhanced divergence in the production of motor forms: Evidence in the early development. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(768), 1274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00768
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prabhakaran, R., Green, A. E., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Thin slices of creativity: Using single-word utterances to assess creative cognition. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0401-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., Raven, J., & Kratzmeier, H. (1994). Advanced progressive matrices:[APM; RAVEN-Matrizen-Test]: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage, 52(3), 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, W., Yuan, Y., Liu, C., & Luo, J. (2017). The roles of the temporal lobe in creative insight: an integrated review. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(4), 321–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1308885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siew, C. S. Q. (2018). The orthographic similarity structure of English words: Insights from network science. Applied Network Science, 3(1), 13https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-018-0068-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siew, C. S. Q., Wulff, D. U., Beckage, N. M., & Kenett, Y. N. (2019). Cognitive network science: A review of research on cognition through the lens of network representations, processes, and dynamics. Complexity, 2019, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2108423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2013). Verbal fluency and creativity: General and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability (Gr) factors to divergent thinking. Intelligence, 41(5), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., Martinez, J. L., & Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68
   Google Scholar
• Sowden, P. T., Pringle, A., & Gabora, L. (2015). The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.885464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stella, M., & Kenett, Y. N. (2019). Viability in multiplex lexical networks and machine learning characterizes human creativity. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 3(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc3030045
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.51.7.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29(1), 41–78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, A., Haynes, O., Cahill, N. D., & Narayan, D. A. (2018). Generalized relationships between characteristic path length, efficiency, clustering coefficients, and density. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 8(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-018-0492-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Liu, Z., Rolls, E. T., Chen, Q., Yao, Y., Yang, W., Wei, D., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., Feng, J., & Qiu, J. (2019). Verbal creativity correlates with the temporal variability of brain networks during the resting state. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991)), 29(3), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). The torrance tests of creative thinking-norms-technical manual research edition-verbal tests. Forms A and B- Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Personnel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2008). What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 51(2), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/030)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Chan, K. Y., & Goldstein, R. (2014). Insights into failed lexical retrieval from network science. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volle, E. (2018). Associative and controlled cognition in divergent thinking: Theoretical, experimental, neuroimaging evidence, and new directions. In R. E. Jung & O. Vartanian (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (pp. 333–362). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Wu, W., Ling, Z., Xu, Y., Fang, Y., Wang, X., Binder, J. R., Men, W., Gao, J.-H., & Bi, Y. (2018). Organizational principles of abstract words in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991)), 28(12), 4305–4318. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. A., & Shah, P. (2006). Uninhibited imaginations: Creativity in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulff, D. U., De Deyne, S., Jones, M. N., Mata, R., & Consortium, T. A. L, Aging Lexicon Consortium (2019). New perspectives on the aging lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, R., Hong, D., & Torrance, P. E. (1988). Cross cultural comparion of creative thinking between Chinese and American students using Torrance Test. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(3), 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., Zhang, Q., & Qiu, J. (2013). Relating inter-individual differences in verbal creative thinking to cerebral structures: An optimal voxel-based morphometry study. PloS One, 8(11), e79272https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., Chen, Q., Xia, L., Beaty, R. E., Yang, W., Tian, F., Sun, J., Cao, G., Zhang, Q., Chen, X., & Qiu, J. (2017). Common and distinct brain networks underlying verbal and visual creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 38(4), 2094–2111. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar