References
- Aczel, B., Szollosi, A., & Bago, B. (2016). Lax monitoring versus logical intuition: The determinants of confidence in conjunction fallacy. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1062801
- Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90–109.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014
- Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2019). The smart system 1: Evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(3), 257–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1507949
- Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2020). Advancing the specification of dual process models of higher cognition: A critical test of the hybrid model view. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1552194
- Barrouillet, P. (2011). Dual-process theories and cognitive development: Advances and challenges [Special Issue: Dual-Process Theories of Cognitive Development]. Developmental Review, 31(2–3), 79–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.002
- Davidson, D. (1995). The representativeness heuristic and the conjunction fallacy effect in children’s decision making. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41(3), 328–346.
- De Neys, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17(5), 428–433.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679280.2006.01723.x
- De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science : A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 7(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429354
- De Neys, W. (Ed.). (2017). Dual process theory 2.0. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204550
- De Neys, W., & Everaerts, D. (2008). Developmental trends in everyday conditional reasoning: The retrieval and inhibition interplay. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(4), 252–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.03.003
- De Neys, W., & Feremans, V. (2013). Development of heuristic bias detection in elementary school. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028320
- De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106(3), 1248–1299.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002
- De Neys, W., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Logic, fast and slow: Advances in dual-process theorizing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 503–509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419855658
- De Neys, W., & Van Gelder, E. (2009). Logic and belief across the lifespan: The rise and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning. Developmental Science, 12(1), 123–130.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00746.x
- De Neys, W., & Vanderputte, K. (2011). When less is not always more: Stereotype knowledge and reasoning development. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 432–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021313
- De Neys, W., Cromheeke, S., & Osman, M. (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PloS One, 6(2), e15954. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015954
- Ericsson, K., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796
- Evans, J. S. B. T. (2019). Reflections on reflection: The nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(4), 383–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1623071
- Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science : A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
- Ferreira, M., Mata, A., Donkin, C., Sherman, S., & Ihmels, M. (2016). Analytic and heuristic processes in the detection and resolution of conflict. Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 1050–1063. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0618-7
- Franssens, S., & Neys, W. D. (2009). The effortless nature of conflict detection during thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 15(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780802711185
- Frey, D., Johnson, E. D., & De Neys, W. (2018). Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 71(5), 1188–1208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1313283
- Handley, S. J., & Trippas, D. (2015). Chapter two - dual processes and the interplay between knowledge and structure: A new parallel processing model. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 62, pp. 33–58). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.002
- Hope, R. M. (2013). Rmisc: Rmisc: Ryan miscellaneous [R package version 1.5]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rmisc
- Houdé, O. (2014). Le raisonnement. Presses Universitaires de France.
- Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Evidence for an inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00148
- Janssen, E. M., Raoelison, M., & de Neys, W. (2020). “You're wrong!”: The impact of accuracy feedback on the bat-and-ball problem! Acta psychologica, 206, 103042. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103042
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus; Giroux.
- Klauer, K., & Singmann, H. (2013). Does logic feel good? Testing for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1265–1273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030530
- Kokis, J. V., Macpherson, R., Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00121-2
- Lanoë, C., Lubin, A., Houdé, O., Borst, G., & De Neys, W. (2017). Grammatical attraction error detection in children and adolescents. Cognitive Development, 44, 127–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.09.002
- Lawrence, M. A. (2016). Ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments [R package version 4.4-0]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ez
- Markovits, H., & Barrouillet, P. (2004). Introduction: Why is understanding the development of reasoning important? Thinking & Reasoning, 10(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780442000006
- Markovits, H., & Nantel, G. (1989). The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions. Memory & Cognition, 17(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03199552
- Markovits, H., de Chantal, P.-L., Brisson, J., & Gagnon-St-Pierre, m. (2019). The development of fast and slow inferential responding: Evidence for a parallel development of rule-based and belief-based intuitions. Memory & Cognition, 47(6), 1188–1200.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00927-3
- Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.621
- Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
- Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
- Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001
- R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Raoelison, M., Thompson, V. A., & De Neys, W. (2020). The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking. Cognition, 204, 104381 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104381
- Raoelison, M., & De Neys, W. (2019). Do we de-bias ourselves?: The impact of repeated presentation on the bat-and-ball problem. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(2), 170–178.
- Reyna, V. F. (2012). A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in fuzzytrace theory. Judgment & Decision Making, 7(3), 332–359.
- Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2011). Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: A fuzzy-trace model [Special Issue: Dual-Process Theories of Cognitive Development]. Developmental Review : DR, 31(2–3), 180–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.004
- Reyna, V. F., & Ellis, S. C. (1994). Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in children’s risky decision making. Psychological Science, 5(5), 275–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00625.x
- Reyna, V. F., Rahimi-Golkhandan, S., Garavito, D. M. N., & Helm, R. K. (2017). The fuzzy-trace dual-process model. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (pp. 90–107). Routledge.
- Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Ii. perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
- Singmann, H., Klauer, K., & Kellen, D. (2014). Intuitive logic revisited: New data and a bayesian mixed model meta-analysis. PLoS One, 9(4), e94223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094223
- Stanovich, K. E. (2018). Miserliness in human cognition: The interaction of detection, override and mindware. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1459314
- Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 215–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.869763
- Thompson, V. A., Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., & Evans, J. S. (2018). Do smart people have better intuitions? Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 147 (7), 945–961. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000457
- Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63(3), 107–140.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
- Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag. https://ggplot2-book.org
- Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K. (2020). Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation [R package version 0.8.5]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
- Wickham, H., Henry, L. (2020). Tidyr: Tidy messy data [R package version 1.0.2]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyr