Accident and agency: a mixed methods study contrasting luck and interactivity in problem solving

References

• Anderson, M., & Magruder, J. (2017). Split-sample strategies for avoiding false discoveries. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23544
   Google Scholar
• Arfini, S., Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2020). The Antinomies of Serendipity How to Cognitively Frame Serendipity for Scientific Discoveries. Topoi 39, 939–948 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9571-3
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (2009). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2011). Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (2017). Cognitive psychology. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 572–588). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bardone, E., & Magnani, L. (2013). Turning down a chance: An argument from simplicity. In Y. Ohsawa, & A. Abe (Eds.), Advances in chance discovery (pp. 19–31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30114-8
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., & Alexander, G. E. (2012). Insight problem solving: A critical examination of the possibility of formal theory. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1143
   Google Scholar
• Bilalić, M., Graf, M., Vaci, N. & Danek, A. (2021) The temporal dynamics of insight problem solving – restructuring might not always be sudden, Thinking & Reasoning, 27(1), 1–37, https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1705912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilda, Z., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, T. (2006). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies, 27(5), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195543
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowden, E., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J. A., & Peterson, M. (2017). The modal account of luck revisited. Synthese, 194(6), 2175–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. T., & Friis-Olivarius, M. (2020). How do initial ideas evolve into final ones? Exploring the cognitive size, structure and life of ideas using sticky notes. In B. T. Christensen, K. Halskov, & C. N. Klokmose (Eds.), Sticky creativity: Post-it note cognition, computers and design (pp. 53–75).Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816566-9.00003-3
   Google Scholar
• Chuderski, A., Jastrzębski, J., & Kucwaj, H. (2021). How physical interaction with insight problems affects solution rates, hint use, and cognitive load. British Journal of Psychology, 112, 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2010). Material surrogacy and the supernatural: Reflections on the role of artefacts in ‘off-line’ cognition. In L. Malafouris, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), The cognitive life to things (pp. 23–28). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffman, E. J. (2009). Does luck exclude control? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87(3), 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802674677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, S. M. (2019). On serendipity in science: Discovery at the intersection of chance and wisdom. Synthese, 196(6), 2385–2406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1544-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: The psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Cushen, P. J., & Wiley, J. (2012). Cues to solution, restructuring patterns, and reports of insight in creative problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1166–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danek, A. H. (2018). Magic tricks, sudden restructuring and the aha! Experience. In F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight: On the origin of new ideas (pp. 51–79). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danek, A. H., Fraps, T., von Müller, A., Grothe, B., & Öllinger, M. (2014). It's a kind of magic-what self-reports can reveal about the phenomenology of insight problem solving . Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1408 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. J., Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2011). Eye movements reveal solution knowledge prior to insight. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedor, A., Szathmáry, E., & Öllinger, M. (2015). Problem solving stages in the five square problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1050 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fioratou, E., & Cowley, S. J. (2009). Insightful thinking: Cognitive dynamics and material artifacts. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 549–572. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.3.04fio
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 436–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.779248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlander, K. J., & Fine, P. A. (2018). "The penny drops": Investigating insight through the medium of cryptic crosswords. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 904 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallucci, M. (2019). GAMLj: General analyses for linear models [jamovi module]. https://gamlj.github.io
   Google Scholar
• Gavurin, E. (1967). Anagram solving and spatial aptitude. Journal of Psychology, 65, 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1967.10543822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., & Murphy, P. (2005). Differentiating insight from non-insight problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(3), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780442000187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., & Webb, M. E. (2018). Working memory in insight problem solving. In F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight: On the origins of new ideas (pp. 105–120). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, M. (2010). Why agent caused actions are not lucky. North American Philosophical Publications, 47(1), 43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, L. G., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2015). Interactivity and mental arithmetic: Coupling mind and world transforms and enhances performance. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 41(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0019
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Heersmink, R. (2013). A taxonomy of cognitive artifacts: Function, information, and categories. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0148-1
   Google Scholar
• Henok, N., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2020). Incubation and interactivity in insight problem solving. Psychological Research, 84(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0992-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsh, D. (2009). Problem solving and situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Ayede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 264–306). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsh, D. (2014). The importance of chance and interactivity in creativity. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.1.01kir
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, D., & Muncer, S. J. (2011). Type and token bigram frequencies for two-through nine-letter words and the prediction of anagram difficulty. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 491–498. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0068-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H. (2013). Videography: Focused ethnography and video analysis. In H. Knoblauch, H.-G. Soeffner, J. Raab, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (pp. 69-85). Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., Fleck, J. I., Green, D. L., Payne, L., Stevenson, J. L., Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2008). The origins of insight in resting-state brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 46(1), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglio, P. P., Matlock, T., Raphaely, D., Chernicky, B., & Kirsh, D. (1999). Interactive skill in Scrabble. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 326–330). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Makri, S., & Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across information serendipitously – Part 1: A process model. Journal of Documentation, 68(5), 684–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411211256030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neth, H., & Payne, S. J. (2011). Interactive coin addition: How hands can help us think. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-third annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 279–284). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, L. R., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). The effects of superficial and structural information on online problem solving for good versus poor anagram solvers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(7), 1098–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701449936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. T. Keane & K. J. Gilhooly (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking (pp. 1–44). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, S. (2018). The dialectic between routine and creative cognition. In F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight: On the origins of new ideas (pp. 8–28). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2014). The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the nine-dot problem. Psychological Research, 78(2), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0494-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A., & Combs, J. (2011). Data analysis in mixed research: A primer. International Journal of Education, 3(1), Article e13. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v3i1.618
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, T. C., MacGregor, J. N., & Chronicle, E. P. (2002). Dynamics and constraints in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, T. C., MacGregor, J. N., Chronicle, E. P., Dewald, A. D., & Chu, Y. (2013). Act first, think later: The presence and absence of inferential planning in problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 41(7), 1096–1108. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0318-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. (2014). The modal account of luck. Metaphilosophy, 45(4–5), 594–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (1995). Luck: The brilliant randomness of everyday life. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, W. (2020). Serendipity. In V. P. Glǎveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave encylopedia of the possible. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, W. (forthcoming a). Heterocalar serendipity and the importance of accidents. In W. Ross & S. Copeland (Eds.), The art of serendipity. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, W. (forthcoming b). Serendipity and creative cognition: Towards a systematic consideration of the serendipitous genesis of a new idea. In S. M. Copeland, M. Sand, & W. Ross (Eds.), Serendipity Science. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, W., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2020). Microserendipity in the creative process. Journal of Creative Behavior.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, W., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2021a). Catch that word: Interactivity, serendipity and verbal fluency in a word production task. Psychological Research, 85(2), 842–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01279-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, W., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2021b). Kinenoetic analysis: Unveiling the material traces of insight. Methods in Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, W., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2021c). Rewilding cognition: Complex dynamics in open experimental systems. Journal of Trial and Error.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, V. L., Burkell, J., & Quan-Haase, A. (2011). Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: A grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Information Research, 16 [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/16-3/paper488.html]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sand, M. (2020). Did Alexander Fleming deserve the Nobel prize? Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(2), 899–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00149-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, C. (2013). Video analysis of practice and the practice of video analysis. In H. Knoblauch, H.-G. Soeffner, J. Raab, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (ppp. 115-127). Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201311054294
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensen, S. V. (2016). Cognitive probatonics: Towards an ecological psychology of cognitive particulars. New Ideas in Psychology, 42, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensen, S. V. (2017). Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing, and verbal patterns in the wild. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain (pp. 85–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8
   Google Scholar
• Steffensen, S. V., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2018). An ecological perspective on insight problem solving. In F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight: On the origins of new ideas (pp. 169–190). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensen, S. V., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2016). Cognitive events in a problem-solving task: A qualitative method for investigating interactivity in the 17 Animals problem. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1095193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terai, H., & Miwa, K. (2013). A chance favors a prepared mind: Chance discovery from cognitive psychology. In Y. Ohsawa, & A. Abe (Eds.), Advances in chance discovery (pp. 33–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30114-8_3
   Google Scholar
• The Jamovi Project. (2020). Jamovi (1.2) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2009). Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallée‐Tourangeau, F. (2014). Insight, interactivity and materiality. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.1.02val
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2018). Introduction. In F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Insight: On the origins of new ideas (pp. 1–7). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Ross, W., Ruffatto Rech, R., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2020). Insight as discovery. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2020.1822367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2020). Mapping systemic resources in problem solving. New Ideas in Psychology, 59, 100812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, G., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2017). Cognition beyond the classical information processing model: Cognitive interactivity and the systemic thinking model (SysTM). In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain (pp. 133–155). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8
   Google Scholar
• Valueva, E., Lapteva, E., & Ushakov, D. (2016). Aha-cueing in problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., & Cropper, S. J. (2016). Insight is not in the problem: Investigating insight in problem solving across task types. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1424 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., & Cropper, S. J. (2018). Once more with feeling: Normative data for the aha experience in insight and noninsight problems. Behavior Research Methods, 50(5), 2035–2056. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0972-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside, D. M., Kealey, T., Semla, M., Luu, H., Rice, L., Basso, M. R., & Roper, B. (2016). Verbal fluency: Language or executive function measure? Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 23(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2015.1004574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Open Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar