The seductive allure effect extends from neuroscientific to psychoanalytic explanations among Turkish medical students: preliminary implications of biased scientific reasoning within the context of medical and psychiatric training

References

• Baker, D. A., Ware, J. M., Schweitzer, N., & Risko, E. F. (2017). Making sense of research on the neuroimage bias. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 26(2), 251–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, A. A., & Hawkins, M. F. (2005). Continuity and discontinuity in the historical development of modern psychopharmacology. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 14(3), 199–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O., & Kalis, A. (2019). Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, e2, 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17002266
   Google Scholar
• Botbol, M., & Gourbil, A. (2018). The place of psychoanalysis in French psychiatry. BJPsych International, 15(1), 3–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brendel, D. H. (2003). Reductionism, eclecticism, and pragmatism in psychiatry: the dialectic of clinical explanation. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 28(5–6), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.28.5.563.18814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. (1991). A philosophical perspective on the mind-body problem or, why neuroscientists and psychologists should care about philosophy. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 135(4), 513–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiao, J. Y. (2009). Cultural neuroscience: A once and future discipline. Progress in Brain Research, 178, 287–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagfal, A. A. (2018). Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976. History of Psychology, 21(3), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, J., & Pluth, E. (2015). Neuroscience and critique: Exploring the limits of the neurological turn. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, B. J. (2013). The biomedical model of mental disorder: A critical analysis of its validity, utility, and effects on psychotherapy research. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(7), 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K. (2012). The nonsense math effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(6), 746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Duque, D., Evans, J., Christian, C., & Hodges, S. D. (2015). Superfluous neuroscience information makes explanations of psychological phenomena more appealing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(5), 926–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierro, C., Álvarez, J. F., & Manzo, G. A. (2019). A century of psychotherapy in Argentina: Clinical psychology, psychoanalysis and recent developments. Revista de Psicología, 27(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2018.52310
   Google Scholar
• Fleury, M.-J., Imboua, A., Aubé, D., Farand, L., & Lambert, Y. (2012). General practitioners’ management of mental disorders: a rewarding practice with considerable obstacles. BMC Family Practice, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, D., & Dickerson, J. A. (2012). Persuasive images in popular science: Testing judgments of scientific reasoning and credibility. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 21(8), 938–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook, C. J., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Look again: Effects of brain images and mind–brain dualism on lay evaluations of research. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(9), 1397–1405. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, E. J., Weisberg, D. S., & Taylor, J. C. (2016). The seductive allure is a reductive allure: People prefer scientific explanations that contain logically irrelevant reductive information. Cognition, 155, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İkiz, T. T. (2011). A short review on the development of psychoanalysis in Turkey. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 22(3), 495–502.
   Google Scholar
• Im, S. h., Varma, K., & Varma, S. (2017). Extending the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations effect to popular articles about educational topics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendler, K. S. (2001). A psychiatric dialogue on the mind-body problem. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(7), 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendler, K. S. (2005). Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(3), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrenzi, P., & Umiltà, C. (2011). Neuromania: On the limits of brain science. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107(1), 343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minahan, J., & Siedlecki, K. L. (2016). Individual differences in Need for Cognition influence the evaluation of circular scientific explanations. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, L., Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Garvan, C. W. (2013). Do instructional interventions influence college students’ critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. E., Rodriguez, F., & Shah, P. (2014). Explaining the alluring influence of neuroscience information on scientific reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1432–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D. (2010). The guru effect. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(4), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0025-0
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, F., & Ortega, F. (2012). Are there neural correlates of depression. In S. Choudhury, J. Slaby (Eds.), Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience (pp. 345–366). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D. S., Taylor, J. C., & Hopkins, E. J. (2015). Deconstructing the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(5), 429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2020). Enhancing mental health pre-service training with the mhGAP intervention guide: Experiences and lessons learned. (9240007660). Author.
   Google Scholar